Quoting: DuncI'm not going to say 4K is snake oil - more resolution can't be worse (leaving aside compression issues, etc.), and I'd be surprised if IMAX wasn't using it, or even 8K, today - but it's way overkill for relatively small screens, at least with current technology.

I'd say that the case is better for small screens than big ones. Watching soaps or a 20—foot face gurning emotively: meh. Having text that's clear with the letters the right shape, and not having chunky aliasing on edges in games, are the kinds of thing that makes a difference when you're close to a screen, which you're going to be for small screen use cases.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Hey, at least if there's a settlement they won't be printing their own Monopoly money to pay it like Epic.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: RoosterAt first we will be like.. Let's just force updates for non tech users.

It's only you that's talking about forcing updates. I'm just saying to enable automatic updates by default to help those that wouldn't be able to enable automatic updates by themselves.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: RoosterI don't see any problem with users not running updates.

A compromised computer will be used as a beachhead for attacks against others. Good computer hygiene protects all of us. Unpatched software puts us all at risk.

If you're technically proficient enough to read patch notes and make an informed choice of whether this particular update needs to be applied at this particular time then you're more than capable of turning automatic updates off. If you're the kind of user that says "ooh, that looks complicated," then you ought to be protected and not a hazard to everyone else by default.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I install updates manually on the machines I use manually, but my NUC HTPC that I only administer over SSH gets its security updates automatically installed with unattended-upgrades. That would seem to be the way to go by default for those distros aimed at new users. It won't help those who stay on a release past EOL, of course, but every little helps.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

The trick would be putting Valve in charge of Google's product cancellation team; Valve Time would cure them of their ADHD.

They also wouldn't be able to cancel any project with a 3 in the name.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

It's been on my Wishlist for ages, but I'm not going to buy it till it comes out of Early Access. They shouldn't run out of funding now, though.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: scaine1. The shoe-horning of the letter K into just about everything.

The use of K for branding was dropped a long time ago.

2. Dolphin and Kate can't be run as sudo.

You don't need to run Kate with sudo. If you really must, you can do the sensible thing and use sudoedit, but Kate will prompt for authorisation when saving a privileged file when run as a normal user anyway.

Not having an easy solution for privileged use of Dolphin is a pain: some file management tasks, particularly as a new user, are much less error-prone when done in a graphical file browser. But you wouldn't have been using sudo with Dolphin in the old days anyway: it would have been kdesu.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Kimyrielle(in case of NVidia you have to add the correct launchpad PPA to your repositories, but that's all)

You don't even need to do that any more on Ubuntu-based distros unless you particularly want to: post-release versions of the Nvidia driver get added to the standard LTS repositories by the Stable Release Updates mechanism, like web browsers do. You can add the PPA if you want a driver version sooner than SRU would have it, but you'll get access to it eventually regardless.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: TheSHEEEP

Quoting: F.UltraTook me until I read the actual filing to realise that the 5 plaintiffs where all gamers, I for some reason thought that they where game developers.

Are you sure about this? That does make the whole thing indeed sound incredibly weird.

It's 3 people that have bought games on Steam for themselves, and 2 people that have bought games on Steam for their children (which they think means they aren't themselves subject to the Steam Subscriber Agreement, despite them necessarily checking the box to say that they are). They aren't the sharpest pencils in the box.

View this comment - View article - View full comments