Quoting: tuubi

Quoting: EikeIt's not like they have a big choice. Starve on itch.io or pay for Steam.

Sad but true.

... and I'm part of the problem. :-/

I don't even use the games I got free from GoG, as they don't integrate well into my favorite launcher, Steam. Is there a clean way to launch Steam games (including DRM'ed ones) from a different launcher?

Hey, this is - by pure chance - bringing us back to the topic of launchers the article had set. :D

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: tuubiYes. It is a huge cut, almost unfair. Of course it's not only access to the storefront, but the download servers and bandwidth as well. In any case, it's apparently what developers are willing to pay to get their games into these stores.

It's not like they have a big choice. Starve on itch.io or pay for Steam.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: tuubiDo you have a problem with that figure, or are you just annoyed about now knowing for sure?

Where I'm coming from is the discussion with F.Ultra, who based his/her argument on the claim that the agreements of publishers/developers with Valve were all open. The share is an example that they're not fully open.

Quoting: tuubiSome developers have hinted or outright said it's (about) 30%, but don't expect them to publish their agreements. Why would they? That's a contract between two companies. There's no requirement these deals need to be in the open or even that Valve's cut should be equal in all contracts. It's very likely bigger publishers with enough clout can negotiate a better deal, but a 30% royalty seems very believable for the rest of them.

Why would they publish it? If you've got one strong part - Valve - and many weaker ones - most develeopers and publishers -, it's IMHO in the interest of the smaller ones to share information. It might strengthen their position.

And I'm curious personally. 30% sound realistic, but I find it quite a big share compared to what Valve (or Apple, Google, ...) is doing.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: F.Ultra

Quoting: Eike

Quoting: F.UltraWhich is why I included the fact that all agreements you have to sign with Valve in order to publish on Steam is public in my previous post.

What's the share Valve takes off the Steam price?

Paradox claims that it's 30% in their Annual Reports which match what others have said the cut is. Seams to be a magic number since that is what Google/Apple et al also seams to take in their stores.

If we've got full access to all agreements you have to sign with Valve in order to publish on Steam, shouldn't we have that information first-hand?

What I'm getting at: It seems we don't have that full access. And I wonder if they're under NDA, because it's not like a lot of game makers are telling us clearly what the share is.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: razing32I've heard of "Preppers" before.
Haven't heard of any having a ballistic missile under their house. :D

Maybe /they/ have secretly dug in his foregarden...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

What I wondered lately...

Quoting: F.UltraWhich is why I included the fact that all agreements you have to sign with Valve in order to publish on Steam is public in my previous post.

What's the share Valve takes off the Steam price?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Not sure I'm prepared for this one. :D

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I nearly preordered the game, but I will wait for the first reports on port quality and gameplay.
I doubt I will pass on this one, though.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I gave Desperados a try, but... while it did trigger fond memories, I don't feel like I'll play it ever again for a longer time. I'd rather use my time (if I had any) for Shadow Tactics, I think.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: stud68Also Bit of Portal Stories Mel on the side.

Great game!
But only Hard Mode is the real thing!

View this comment - View article - View full comments