The "RTX on" meme has fully turned against them

View this comment - View article - View full comments

The update is worth something, but "since it's such a big fuss" just to not LIE is just whiny loser talk.

To people who say "we shouldn't have to put AI disclaimers on things because people might not use/watch/buy it": That is called consumer choice. Some would say it's unfair that they have to show corn syrup on their ingredients because people avoid buying food made with corn syrup, even though it's perfectly functional food that tastes fine!

When I eat the Nestle-branded ice cream frozen dairy dessert and feel ill and unsatisfied, I should be able to look at the ingredients, see that corn syrup is at the top of the list, and make future decisions with that knowledge. That allows me to make a choice as a consumer instead of just thinking "I guess food is just terrible now" while they price out the competition by making evil fake ice cream.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

It certainly looks like they've drawn over the in-game frame with AI art.
...why?

You know, with video games, there is already a neural network interpreting from the simplified rendering of reality and converting it into the image the player perceives - it's called a brain. They're removing abstraction that works in the favor of immersion. That's why games from the 90s and such could look "good" even though they couldn't be photorealistic.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: GustyGhostOne thing I've learned is that the masses will always make the wrong choice. Large populations of humans do not make decisions that collectively help the best interests of themselves or others.

I think that's a very anti-democratic stance to take.
I argue that people do tend to make the right choice, so long as they are informed and not under duress. The problem is that people are subject to a great deal of propaganda and hardship to keep them from making better choices.

I have friends who want to switch to things like Linux who are just so burnt out that they don't have the mental energy to make the change. Even if it turned out to be easy for them, making that choice and starting the process of doing that is not nothing.

The world would be a better place if everyone had access to good journalism, healthcare, and a full night of sleep.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Honestly, I would have accepted his argument if he didn't decide to hide it.
I definitely get too much secondhand propaganda due to a family member in enterprise software, but the quote (emphasized bit aside) seems broadly correct to me.

I still hate generative AI, it's still seemingly the culprit behind half of every problem I see in the world. I do at least understand the perspective of people who are trying to make the best of it.

And, sort of relevant to all of us is that Linus Torvalds seems to at least selectively approve of AI tools, even though he also condemns slop, etc. Not saying how anyone should feel about that, but I feel it bears acknowledging in this context.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I like Valve, but I'm not giving them any sympathy on this. Lootboxes and gambling suck.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: GustyGhostThey could use this extra time to polish up the Linux client with 64 bit and other things that don't rely on semiconductor manufacture.

That's surely handled by a different team, right?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Can't hear the NVIDIA updates over the fans of my perfectly functional GTX 1070...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Too cheap and lazy for voices, why'd anyone expect cybersecurity? Maybe they "generated" that, too.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Not quite as bad as their new government-approved 3D printer bill but hey, it's nice they're trying to give it competition.

View this comment - View article - View full comments