Looks to me that if the code were released under a creative commons license, it'd be CC BY-NC-SA [External Link].

So, I'd be pretty comfortable with calling it OSS BY-NC-SA, despite it not adhering to one of the "official" open source licenses.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I know calling it a rip-off might seem harsh, but — just look at it. I do mean it in the nicest possible way as well. What you get is an overly silly wizarding sandbox game to run around in and cause some ridiculousness either alone or with friends.

"Parody" is the word you're looking for.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: berarmaWhile most comments here imply that Nintendo used extortion, I think it's just an economical agreement. That's how it looks. Nintendo must have offered him a good payment to stop developing the emulator and shutting down everything under his control. Why pay an army of lawyers if you can pay just the main dev?

As if the potential legal threat isn't going to factor largely into anyone's thinking.

The "that's a nice life you've got there, it'd be a shame if anything were to happen to it" will always be implied when dealing with nintendo about such things.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: monyarmWhy do these emulator devs keep bending over backwards for Nintendo? Emulation and Reverse Engineering have both been proven to be legal on multiple ocassions. Literally all Nintendo can do is huff and puff.

Extortion.

Nintendo can sue anyone out of existence, regardless of whether they are right or not.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

You can also bookmark and buy games using our affiliate/partner links (and they really do help!):

Bonus tip: in firefox, manage bookmarks, one can set a keyword (I use gog) so that one gets taken to the bookmarked page when typing said keyword in the address bar.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Cultural pirates.

Nintendo, that is.

Gentle reminder that if one values one's future nostalgia, it is recommended to not let nintendo hold it hostage.

Helpful thread with game suggestions: https://www.gamingonlinux.com/forum/topic/6016/

On a completely unrelated side note: I've been taking a looksie at the ayaneo air variants. Does anyone know of any other similarly switch-sized deck-alikes?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: hardpenguin

Need help with GOG games on Linux desktop and Steam Deck? Check out the Heroic Games Launcher that just recently had an upgrade.

Hot take: GOG wouldn't be worth it for us Linux gamers if it wasn't for Heroic and the projects it relies on (like gogdl and comet).

Delve in for the titles that are not available on Steam: https://www.gog.com/en/games/tags/only-on-gog [External Link]

Heroic is awesome, but gog would still be worth it for the drm-free downloads.

The lack a stupid compulsory shop application just to extract the data files for use in an open source interpreter of my choice is a breath of fresh air in the digital purchases space. So is the fact that gog, unlike a certain other shop, isn't blocking access to a third party launcher.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Before some comments come along to try and wriggle this into a “Native Linux is better” type of argument, that’s just nonsense. We’ve seen numerous games remove their Native Linux builds completely, or drop support for them, heck I wrote about one such case earlier today. Native vs Proton is not the issue, platform support is, regardless of how the games are made to work.

Native linux is better :grin:

That is, however, not relevant to the discussion of proton support. I think you put your finger fairly correctly on the pain spot: there is no label with which devs can indicate that they will support proton.

This is not only confusing for the users, it's also unfair to devs that have committed themselves to supporting it.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I've got a fairly rigorous personal policy when it comes to games with in-game spending or even some of the ones that come with much non-free dlc: they are out.

I simply will not allow such adversarial design elements in my gaming time.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: finaldestHere we go again,

When will folks learn that physical media is the only true way to have ownership.

I know PC games generally don't get physical releases so I now buy PS4 and PS5 games when I want a copy to preserve. Most PlayStation games work offline without ever needing an update but PS5 does have a backup option built in.

I still primarily buy games on Steam but accept the risk I could lose games in the future. I will also be using GOG where possible to buy games I want to preserve as they offer a direct download of the installer.

I now have over 600 Movies and 30 PS4/5 Games on physical. I now refuse to just rely on 3rd parties with my media purchases.

True ownership has nothing to do with physical media: any drm-free game purchased digitally grants you more ownership than any disk (or even cartridge) release that comes preloaded with a phone-home-to-see-if-the-publisher-grants-permission-to-play check.

Even this current case still allows you to get your eternally playable copy before they remove it - where the shutdown of a grant-permission-server would have blocked you from playing it in the future if this game had had drm restrictions.

View this comment - View article - View full comments