Steamdeck is Zen 2. Currently limited to Zen 3. Hopefully they mean it when they say "we will support more in future after we verify the hardware and SBIOS functionalities"

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Can we also note here:

The Linux port was put on hold while TROY was exclusive to Epic

Epic's complete lack of Linux support means games don't get ported to Linux as well (Because why would you port a game to Linux if there is no way to ship the build or launch it, due to contractual obligations that says distribution must go through EGS which doesn't support that).

Steam's solution sucks for Feral (and anyone doing porting) but at least we get the games running on Linux.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: DribbleondoWhy would they? If EAC and other acquisitions are to go by, they have no interest in locking SDK's and services pertinent to other game engines to their platform because if anything, it helps them. They indirectly benefit from contracts made by RAD and others.

You mean like rocket league?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Hopefully this contains the esync/fsync changes necessary for GloriousEggroll to move past 5.9? Or is that still a core wine issue.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

https://www.protondb.com/app/327030 [External Link]

I had to use proton to gets Worms WMD to run. The native version was broken.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: subDespite not even remotely considering Nvidia products for myself,
someone not waiting for AMD's release (soon) before buying a 30XX must be outright crazy. :D

I want to agree with you. But for people who dont care about nvidia vs AMD. For $700 in 1.5 months, AMD is not going to go roll out something noticeably faster than the 3080. They might roll something out at $700 but the same speed, or they might roll something out 20% faster than 3080... but costs more.

And at that point, you've just waited 1.5 months to get something that is roughly equal.

The reason to wait is because rushing into anything is a bad idea, or because you care about open source drivers (most buyers are going to be Windows, so not like AMD is really winning any favor there). I personally am waiting because of open source drivers, so for the moment I'm an AMD "loyalist". This generation is theirs to lose. I'm basically planning on building a new PC with a threadripper 4960x and a radeon 6700xt at the end of the year. If the top tier card of theirs is slower than a 3070, or costs $1000 for less than 3080 performance... I'll go nvidia. But I 100% don't expect to get a better price to performance deal, only better open source drivers.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

"Do you want to talk at our X11 Conference?"
"Sure I'd love to talk about Wayland"

I really hope that's how it actually went down. Seems like it has been well received (and I have no idea if there is any "bad blood" between X and Wayland devs, hopefully there is a unified "make Linux better" camaraderie).

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: The_Aquabatbecause synthetic benchmarks are not real world gaming.
100% increment in performance is just a buzzword.

They did 2 things here:

1. compared the 3070 to the 2080ti, then compared the 3080 to the 2080 (non super). They primed your brain so when you hear "twice as fast" you think "twice as fast as the 2080ti"... Even though 25% faster than the 2080ti is exactly what their graph (shown in the article) roughly says.

2. pushed REALLY hard for RTX numbers. Linus Tech Tips says Nvidia reached out and told them "oh no, the double performance thing was for Quake RTX and Minecraft RTX". In reality, the 3080 is only 25-75% (depending on game) faster than the 2080. (which still leaves it faster than a 2080ti by a pretty nice margin).

What really bothers me the most is that this is in fact a new fastest card. it IS faster than the 2080ti, at like half the price. No one buying this is getting ripped off, even at the lower numbers (unless AMD has something even faster for even cheaper coming out in a month, and even then, worst case, it will be comparable). So why even bother to fluff the numbers. The only reason is because most 1080ti owners didnt upgrade to 2000 series. Which is a good thing in a way because of e-waste and what not... But nvidia this time around really wants everyone to feel the need to upgrade, even if they dont need to.

I personally am holding out for some big navi news. It looks like the driver situation is already making some progress.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Whenever I see "linux support" and "VR support"... I feel like that doesn't always guarantee "VR on Linux support"

linux + valve index + this game = ?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: The_AquabatI keep hearing about Navi being buggy, I haven't find bugs on my navi. Maybe I hit the silicon lottery? is there any documentation about the bugs? are there any workarounds?

I booted into windows for the first time in 5 years and kept getting BSODs on my Vega64. Which only happen when I have 3 monitors on. Turn off a monitor? Rock solid. Found forum posts describing this from over a year ago. While the Navi launch was a bit bumpy on linux, AMD drivers on windows have perpetually been a disaster for every GPU after polaris. A lot of the "Navi is terrible, worst thing ever" stuff is Windows drivers related. Not that there arent any hardware gotchas, or linux driver issues (see shmerl's post for references), but I've mostly heard positive things about Navi on linux recently.

View this comment - View article - View full comments