Quoting: Shmerl

Quoting: TheRiddickSoftware DRM still minimises potential software sale loses

That's the point, it doesn't minimize anything of the sort.

Perhaps, but no matter how much you scream murder, DRM is here to stay unfortunately. I generally don't let it get in the way of me buying the software I want.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Yeah screendoor is a issue. In all honestly I would probably wait for the 4k helmets anyway, one coming out later this year already (they advertise it as 8k but yeah, that's marketing BS). PIMAX is the brand. I'll wait for reviews. Not sure if a 1080ti is enough for it however...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Field of view: 110 degrees

When Vive gets a larger FOV such as 140+, then I'll be interested. My IRL FOV is quite high so 110 would look a bit like goggle vision for me.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

You can over analysis it as much as you like, at the end of the day its in their rights to secure the copyright of their IP how they see fit. I've never had a major issue with any games or software I bought, and some have serious DRM security (Simplify3D is MAC based!).

I know there are some real bad examples of DRM implementation, but that is on the dev/pub. And often those games suffer in sales due to the extreme drm methods (such as using VM).

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Software DRM still minimises potential software sale loses and is kinda needed if you have a popular multiplayer component because just look at what has happened to PUBG. Brought to its knees due to cheaters/hackers and if they couldn't sell those keys to those cheaters and they could just copy/paste the game indefinitely due to no DRM.... the developer would go under.

This extreme anti-drm movement is a bit silly IMO. There is a reason to have certain levels of DRM, its just when it goes too far is the problem!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

DRM has its place. The only time when it becomes a problem is when publishers use multiple layers and virtualisation methods to do it that kill game performance. I think Ubisoft and MS have done this in the past, it doesn't pay off but they still try as they might, silly corporate CEO's and shareholders...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Did they resolve the Battleye compatibility issue? or are they just allowing linux players to connect without the need to authenticate (how many Mac and Linux users would write their own memory hacks to cheat? not much risk)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Looks so very much like Decent, not sure how it compares to decent underground but sounds and effects look more homage to Decent then DU. Probably better too,.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Hopefully they can get a Linux version done after initial windows released, not the best situation but its better then them trying during development, running out of money, then going belly up!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Seems it would be extremely reliant on other players and server population. What if your the only person around? do you just keep respawning as a baby and fend for yourself?

View this comment - View article - View full comments