Latest Comments by TacoDeBoss
Google plan over 120 Stadia games this year, 10 coming to Stadia before other platforms
19 Jan 2020 at 6:17 am UTC
19 Jan 2020 at 6:17 am UTC
Quoting: Purple Library GuyMicrosoft and EA are both releasing their games on Steam again - I think they're both realizing that the restrictions to Microsoft Store and Origin are just limiting their profit margins. No idea, but Microsoft being all buddy-buddy with Valve is turning out to be a very bad thing for us.Quoting: mao_dze_dunMicrosoft and EA are both friends with Valve againThey are? I don't follow the broader news in this area; how did that happen?
AMD officially announce Ryzen 7 CPUs for launch on March 2nd
24 Feb 2017 at 4:31 am UTC
24 Feb 2017 at 4:31 am UTC
Quoting: EikeTrouble is: I'm not sure replacing my Intel 3570K would actually speed up any game. If it does, I will strongly consider buying an AMD CPU.Well, under Windows at least, yeah, you'd probably gain 15-30 FPS in every game. Don't know under Linux, most people don't do CPU gaming benchmarks under Linux.
AMD officially announce Ryzen 7 CPUs for launch on March 2nd
24 Feb 2017 at 4:26 am UTC
24 Feb 2017 at 4:26 am UTC
Quoting: SirBubblesDon't radeons chew up a bit more power than nvidia? Also the driver situation for linux has a sad, sad history of being a tad deficient. I don't know if it's getting a good deal better or not, but I remember having to compile kernel modules for Mandrake Linux and having them break every other boot. Fun times.Haha, it's practically switched. With Nvidia, the kernel modules break all the flipping time. But with AMD, once you install Mesa, it's *installed.* It's not going anywhere.
Wouldn't mind being able to go with a full AMD setup, but the odds aren't good, especially as I have a nice nvidia 970 at the moment. Want to pair it up with a halfway decent cpu though.
A new radeonsi (Mesa) patch should fix issues in many games for AMD GPU owners
22 Jan 2017 at 11:04 pm UTC
If things aren't working for you, you're probably doing something wrong.
22 Jan 2017 at 11:04 pm UTC
Quoting: XicronicEr, I just moved from a GTX 1080 to an RX 460. I've had but one problem after I got the drivers compiled, a color issue with Mad Max which is apparently caused by LLVM. Everything else has worked exactly how I expect it to.Quoting: finaldestI have been keeping a close eye on this as I really wanted a RX480 but chose to go with a 1070 due to driver support. So I would like to thank all involved who are working hard to improve the drivers.Don't count on it. I know there's a lot of hype and excitement around AMD, but my "upgrade" from a 660 Ti to an RX 480 is regression in half the games I want to play, and a headache in plenty of others. The situation may change now that they can focus on optimizations rather than just getting games to run at all, but for the foreseeable future NVIDIA is still a much better choice.
The AMD drivers have been progressing very well recently so I really am looking to put a VEGA gpu into my new ZEN build once released. I may just have a full AMD system soon if all goes well.
If things aren't working for you, you're probably doing something wrong.
Mesa 17-rc1 released, it's a massive update for open source graphics
20 Jan 2017 at 1:01 am UTC
Good to see improvements to Mesa since I've recently switched over to AMD for my main Linux machine.
20 Jan 2017 at 1:01 am UTC
Quoting: giamicI was too fast rejoicing: 15 minutes into the game, it crashed badly. :DHmm, interesting.
@TacoDeBoss: cause it's such a massive improvement.
Naah, just joking. I read that previously names were increased when a new openGL version was supported. Now, with the release of Vulkan, openGL is no longer developed and mesa would be stuck to number 13 forever. So they decided to change and number according to the year of publishing, much like Ubuntu.
Good to see improvements to Mesa since I've recently switched over to AMD for my main Linux machine.
Mesa 17-rc1 released, it's a massive update for open source graphics
19 Jan 2017 at 5:50 pm UTC Likes: 2
19 Jan 2017 at 5:50 pm UTC Likes: 2
Wh-Why did it go from 13 to 17???
Minecraft's new launcher is now available on Linux
19 Jan 2017 at 2:49 pm UTC
19 Jan 2017 at 2:49 pm UTC
Quoting: LeviI've just tried it on my system. Doesn't work at this point.Yeah, the Reddit post says Ubuntu 16.10 or its equivalent minimum.
I kinda expected it, seeing as my system is a bit aged at this point. (Ubuntu 14.04 base)
Still, great to see Mojang is keeping their word and is still maintaining linux as a platform.
32-bit Linux distributions are no longer supported by Steam, Steam Web Browser disabled
22 Dec 2016 at 10:52 pm UTC
22 Dec 2016 at 10:52 pm UTC
This discussion is ridiculous. It's like saying "I bought Half-Life 1 on Steam back in 2003 on my Windows XP rig and now it won't run anymore! This is fraud!"
Get real, people. 32-bit is bad enough on Windows, but on Linux you dive into dependency hell when you dawdle in 32-bit. It's bad. Official Steam support for 32-bit systems should be cancelled. 64-bit is the only way to progress OS and game development in the modern era.
Not to mention there's little excuse. I've seen people in this thread posing the question "What happens to 32-bit users?"
They upgrade. If you're running 32-bit, you're probably not running any games anyway. You can get an quad core amd64 CPU for $75 USD, and a motherboard to go with it for $60 USD. And that's not even on sale.
Really, almost nobody should run 32-bit anymore. 64-bit is affordable and objectively superior.
The ONLY argument for 32-bit support is for legacy software. Most of that can be run on amd64 systems anyway.
I do think it should be an option to download 32-bit distros or some other sort of i386 toolset to compile 32-bit code, but beyond that, 32-bit is useless.
Get real, people. 32-bit is bad enough on Windows, but on Linux you dive into dependency hell when you dawdle in 32-bit. It's bad. Official Steam support for 32-bit systems should be cancelled. 64-bit is the only way to progress OS and game development in the modern era.
Not to mention there's little excuse. I've seen people in this thread posing the question "What happens to 32-bit users?"
They upgrade. If you're running 32-bit, you're probably not running any games anyway. You can get an quad core amd64 CPU for $75 USD, and a motherboard to go with it for $60 USD. And that's not even on sale.
Really, almost nobody should run 32-bit anymore. 64-bit is affordable and objectively superior.
The ONLY argument for 32-bit support is for legacy software. Most of that can be run on amd64 systems anyway.
I do think it should be an option to download 32-bit distros or some other sort of i386 toolset to compile 32-bit code, but beyond that, 32-bit is useless.
You might want to avoid the Nvidia 375.20 driver, Nvidia recommend downgrading
30 Nov 2016 at 8:00 am UTC
30 Nov 2016 at 8:00 am UTC
I wish that was an option...
But I run Debian Sid and the X Server was upgraded. 375.20 is the only driver that supports it.
But I run Debian Sid and the X Server was upgraded. 375.20 is the only driver that supports it.
- GOG now using AI generated images on their store [updated]
- CachyOS founder explains why they didn't join the new Open Gaming Collective (OGC)
- The original FINAL FANTASY VII is getting a new refreshed edition
- GPD release their own statement on the confusion with Bazzite Linux support [updated]
- Bazzite Linux founder releases statement asking GPD to cease using their name
- > See more over 30 days here
How to setup OpenMW for modern Morrowind on Linux / SteamOS and Steam Deck
How to install Hollow Knight: Silksong mods on Linux, SteamOS and Steam Deck
Source: i.imgur.com
View cookie preferences.
Accept & Show Accept All & Don't show this again Direct Link