Torvalds, what a guy. :heart:

View this comment - View article - View full comments

It's so stupid I'm speechless.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

It's mind blowing (and somewhat hilarious) to see how naive they were...
Even me not using Steam, I perfectly know why the majority of people use it and don't want to leave, it's just obvious.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I'm a bit surprised so I ask the question: is anyone know if these are available on the AUR? It doesn't seems to be the case.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Steam FAQ [External Link]

Q: Is Ballionaire playable on Mac/Linux?

A: At this time, there is no Linux or Mac version (there is, however, a native SteamDeck version.)

:huh:

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Jarmer

Quoting: CyrilLiam, like many people here, you have a monster of a PC, of course you don't care about snaps in performance aspects.

Liam does have a good computer (same specs I have) but I built my pc in 2020, which is coming up on 5 years old pretty soon. The specs he and I are running are nowhere near top of the line. Saying he doesn't care about performance on his system isn't fair at all. And it doesn't even really make sense. Of course he cares about performance, we all do.

2020 is pretty recent, especially when you built this computer for gaming purpose, it's not an issue at all when speaking about general use... no this is not the question.
What I meant, if it wasn't clear, it's just that in that context you don't care because the power of your machine will surpass the downside of using snaps anyway.

I wasn't speaking of storage itself, but snaps take more boot time. So in the end it's just slower for general use and it's boring, when it was fine with non-snaps packages.
In that context, I don't see the gain of using them at all.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Liam DaweThis "bloat" is not something normies care about, only pedantic people who like to watch a few extra MBs get used up. The reality is: only a few people really care.

Liam, like many people here, you have a monster of a PC, of course you don't care about snaps in performance aspects.
But in reality, not only your reality, when your low-end computer slow down because of snaps (it worked perfectly fine before), I assure you: you care.
And when because of that, you think about buying new hardware, I assure you: you care.
In the end it's just more waste (we surely don't need that) for zero benefit of using snaps for normies (as you say).
Microsoft do this kind of shit to force people to buy new hardware, people complain about that and some did installed Linux, we don't need Linux distribution doing the same as Microsoft for "reasons" that only make sense (globally) for Canonical.
It's just crazy to pretend there is no problem about that, and worse: that it only concern pedantic people...
I hope there are people who understands me, as it seems nobody in the comments mentioned that until now.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: CaldathrasLike Diablo II: Resurrected, they built in the ability to swap between the original or remastered graphics.

This is always a nice feature to see, a few games did that too, and it's cool.
But yeah Blizzard is doing shit, doesn't change that.
Out of curiosity, I watched some videos of comparison between the original Warcraft I & II games and the remasters, and it's just awful AI upscale...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Nintendo, do you like it? :smile:

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: 14

Quoting: Leahi84Great, so they can make From Software games Sony exclusives...

I would actually hope it would bring Bloodborne to PC.

The dream lives on... :grin:

View this comment - View article - View full comments