Quoting: joaojottaIt honestly doesn't sound that great. Maybe I'm just not seeing it. Where could it be applied?

?????
How about every single game that can (normally) only be played together via local shared-/splitscreen?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I also played it before (1-2 years) and it is quite impressive how much it has evolved since then.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Liam DaweAs noted in the article, it's terrible in Steam Play when previously the actual Linux version with NVIDIA was great.

Silly me, thought you were talking about the legacy one there.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: sub

Quoting: MaCroX95I can't help myself but expect "Planetary Annihilation: TITANS drops linux support" soon xD

Plus

"We're looking into ways to support Linux via Steam Play"

Would be fine if that worked, but... does it even?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Klaas

Quoting: rustybroomhandle(…)A developer can't just release a game on GoG. They have to submit it to them and hope that whomever reviews it likes it enough to want it there. (…)

So you imply that GOG rejected the Linux version (because “it's too niche”) while they liked the Windows versions enough to release it?

I don't think GOG can reject platform releases. Just entire games and what platform they release on is up to the developer.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Starship Troopers is satire?!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: ixnariYou would think dropping Mac and Linux support would warrant a separate post, but no, it's better to bundle it in a fucking Q&A session where most people would miss it.

Yeah, that is REALLY weird and messed up.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Kimyrielle

Quoting: TheSHEEEPI don't want to wait X years for 4.X to come out

If I am not totally mistaken, 4.0 is supposed to get released in 2020, which is not THAT far in the future. :)

It is possible, but then again, with how often goals have been shifted into the next release, it is simply very uncertain what really will be part of 4.0 and what won't - apart from the new renderer, anyway.
And delays are normal in non-open source projects with strong management. In open source projects with very little management, even more so.

It's just not something I'd suggest waiting for if you really want to be working with Godot for certain projects and don't want a long uncertain waiting time.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: iiari

Quoting: TheSHEEEP

Quoting: BeamboomAre there any games out now that do a good job in showcasing this engine from a modern (not retro) perspective?

Not gonna happen anytime soon, I'm afraid.
Godot is still lacking in some vital departments required for really modern 3D gaming.

So, for we gamers who know near nothing about development, do you think the Godot hype is just wishful hoping on our part right now, or is there real promise here?

There is great potential, without a doubt.
As @Eraindil said - and I fully agree - the editor itself is just way more intuitive, as is its scripting language (though you can use C# as well if you want).

I'm sticking with the engine for a reason, despite having to use workarounds for now. I'll just take it as programming excercise ;)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: BeamboomAre there any games out now that do a good job in showcasing this engine from a modern (not retro) perspective?

Not gonna happen anytime soon, I'm afraid.
Godot is still lacking in some vital departments required for really modern 3D gaming. Pathfinding/navigation, for example, is almost unusable in 3D, lacking important features.
The renderer is also currently being rewritten, both to improve it in general and to add Vulkan.

Both the Navigation and Pathfinding reworks are supposed to be in 4.0 - but when that will come out, nobody knows. Originally, the Navigation rework was supposed to be in 2.X, then 3.0, then 3.1, then 3.2, now it got pushed to 4.0...

As much as I love Godot (and will use it my own 3D project, will likely even create a proper 3D navigation module as I don't want to wait X years for 4.X to come out), the developers are really struggling with proper planning, prioritization, community handling and communicating their plans.

I really think they have to improve in that regard. They are collecting over 10k funds via Patreon each month, I think that would justify becoming a bit more professional in these things, instead of "just" focusing on development.

Don't get me wrong, you can absolutely make a modern non-retro game with Godot right now, but it will require you to either use a couple of modules to work around limitations or roll your own workarounds.
But that might simply be too much hassle for many users, who then opt to use Unity, etc. instead.

View this comment - View article - View full comments