I finally gave the game a spin with the latest patch on Windows and.. uh...
definitely wait a few patches.
Even after all this time, the game still has loads of minor bugs and a few game-breaking ones (including one that ended my playthrough after 32 hours as I couldn't exit a level any more).
There's also still some Russian text, including whole quest logs, which is just hilarious.

And IF you play it, play it only if you play it for the atmosphere.
The combat is just completely bland and mediocre and the "RPG" (if I could emphasize the quotation marks even more, I would) system is the worst I have seen in my 20+ years of gaming.

As I said somewhere else, this is probably the first (and hopefully only) game that would have been better if it was a walking sim.
The atmosphere and setting is that great, but the rest is that bad.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Can't wait to start playing this, definitely on top of my "next" list.
I find the art of these games really inspiring and hope some artists take note of how to produce these 8-directional sprites.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: EhvisI wonder how big the spike in Linux "users" will be after an announcement like this. Without details, some non-Linux players might just see an opportunity to refund their game after a huge amount of hours.

I don't think that's a risk.
What Windows gamer is going to install Linux just to get a refund of a single game?
Sounds a bit silly to me.
It's not exactly a get-rich-quick-scheme ;)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Mountain ManSeems like every time these guys make an announcement about Linux, they live up to their name.

Well, it's kinda unlikely we'll ever hear about them again. At least here.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Is the game actually fixed and playable now or still full of incomplete features and bugs?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I'm using Manjaro with KDE Plasma, but since I'm not in the habit of downloading, installing or executing random files, I still feel pretty safe.
I've also been using Windows since many, many years without any kind of antivirus software and never had any problems whatsoever.

Frankly, nothing is ever entirely safe. And the biggest safety risk is not some software vulnerability sitting hidden behind some execution layers, but something entirely different sitting in front of the monitor...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: BOYSSSSS

Quoting: TheSHEEEPAnd for that information, Platinum = just works out of the box, I don't have to do anything. Gold = works once you do X.
For that purpose, it is entirely irrelevant if what you have to do is a Proton option or a game option or edit some config files. It either runs perfectly without doing anything, or it runs perfectly after doing something. At least as far as users are concerned, which should always be the goal of tool development.

I get that whitelisting isn't really possible if something needs to be changed about the game itself, but that is something to be discussed in Github Proton/Valve issues, not something ProtonDB should be decisive in.

And if all that is required to run a game via Proton on Steam is to set some Proton option, then that Proton option should simply be set by default when running the game -> thus, the user has to do nothing and the game "just works" -> Platinum. All other cases -> Gold or worse.

IMO it doesn't make sense for Gold to include every possible change needed from user. There's a big difference between changing installing/adding files to run the game and adding a Launch option like NO_D3D11 ESYNC FSYNC or USE_D9VK. There should be another rating like Titanium or something which is just for Environment Variables/arguments/Launch options. It would also be great if there were two ratings, one for how the game runs, another for performance compared to native.

The ratings sure aren't perfect.
Introducing more rating woulds likely lead to even more confusion and unclear ratings, though.

What could work is to split the single rating into multiple parts without subjective judgements required.
Only yes/no questions (+ the Proton version & system info & comment, of course), leaving no room for uncertainty.
1. Does this game run perfectly for you?
2. Did you have to to enable Proton flags?
3. Did you have to run the game with non-Proton parameters?
4. Did you have to take other steps to make the game run?

Of course you can't have too many of these, but going away from anything requiring people to give an unclear score sounds like an improvement to me.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Comandante ÑoñardoIf you use PROTON 4.11-1 and you need to enable "PROTON_USE_D9VK=1 %command% for to run a game perfectly from beginning to end, you have a Proton Platinum game and you can report it.

Proton options are valid for to whitelist a game.
Game options like "-nointro" or "-dx9" are not valid for to whitelist a game.

Proton Gold is when you have to edit some game file or manually run winetricks for to install this or that library for to run the game without issues. PROTON GOLD games will never be whitelisted.

Remember that We are doing PROTON tests and that includes the use of PROTON environments options.

I see that most people here think that this about game tests on Linux via PROTON and that is a common error.

I'm sorry, but what I see here is gigantic disconnect between what a developer thinks should be done and what people actually want and need.
Nobody goes to ProtonDB to check how well Proton runs. People go there to check how well they will be able to run X via Steam Play (and I guess there is also 1-2% or so using Proton without Steam...).
ProtonDB is not for developers, it is for users, though I'm not arguing it wouldn't also be valuable resource for devs. Github is for developers.

And for that information, Platinum = just works out of the box, I don't have to do anything. Gold = works once you do X.
For that purpose, it is entirely irrelevant if what you have to do is a Proton option or a game option or edit some config files. It either runs perfectly without doing anything, or it runs perfectly after doing something. At least as far as users are concerned, which should always be the goal of tool development.

I get that whitelisting isn't really possible if something needs to be changed about the game itself, but that is something to be discussed in Github Proton/Valve issues, not something ProtonDB should be decisive in.

And if all that is required to run a game via Proton on Steam is to set some Proton option, then that Proton option should simply be set by default when running the game -> thus, the user has to do nothing and the game "just works" -> Platinum. All other cases -> Gold or worse.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Eike

Quoting: TheSHEEEP

Quoting: Purple Library Guy

Quoting: TheSHEEEPWeird as it sounds, I was somewhat disappointed when I played the game and couldn't toot the horn.
It felt a bit like playing GTA, but being unable to toot aggressively.

Don't you know that proper society frowns on blowing your own horn? :wink:

That might explain some of the reactions I've earned...

But, mind the children...!

I did!
That angered people even more...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Purple Library Guy

Quoting: TheSHEEEPWeird as it sounds, I was somewhat disappointed when I played the game and couldn't toot the horn.
It felt a bit like playing GTA, but being unable to toot aggressively.

Don't you know that proper society frowns on blowing your own horn? :wink:

That might explain some of the reactions I've earned...

View this comment - View article - View full comments