@ScottCarammell
I don't really get the comparisons to No Man's Sky either. I finished the game on launch. It was already a phenomenal game, just plagued with bugs. I was lucky, I suppose. I played it on PC and didn't run into all that many bugs. As I understand it, it was especially the console ports that were scuffed on launch.

What I remember this game the most for is the city. Even though it's more of a L.A. Noire situation, where the open world city just serves as a backdrop to everything else that's happening in the game rather than driving the game itself. The difference is in that Night City is the single most jaw dropping piece of backdrop I've seen. In terms of design and presentation, Night City is truly incredible and the devs paid plenty of attention to detail.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

If I remember correctly, previously, they claimed they cannot update the anti-cheat, basically because they fucked up the implementation, they modified it too much. That's why it's been so wonky. Until now. Now that the support for their old version runs out, it seems that all barriers for updating are gone all of a sudden?!

Not that I do not appreciate that Fatshark is still keeping this game alive...but it's a little bit too late in my case. My friends have literally made families with kids before they updated their damn anti cheat, so unless someone here is missing a fourth person to play with, I won't be playing this anytime soon :wink:

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Civvie 11 is going to love this.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

but anyway, what they should have done since they created the framework (and the first campaign, while a 'game', was merely a showcase for the framework) to be so amazingly flexible was just pump out modules every week or month, big, small, medium, with voice, without voice, new assets

just like a regular roleplaying game book would come out and be a basic framework, and then they'd release adventures and settings and things, that's what i thought they were going to do at the time but... no, always seemed like a wasted opportunity

That's what would have happened if NWN released today, yes. I bet it was definitely the idea to be releasing modules and asset packs and stuff, but this idea was a little bit ahead of time. There was no infrastructure to facilitate all of this yet, games were still sold primarily on physical media.

At the same time though, NWN is purely a product of its time, because making something similar today - something more akin to a framework for RPG adventures rather than just a cRPG - with modern production values that gamers expect today is impossible. The costs are simply put too high, which is why there's nothing similar to NWN as far as I'm aware.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: "Raaben"I really wish Beamdog were in charge of 2 as well, but as long as we're getting it back in some form. For single player, I will die on the hill that 2 is actually so much better than 1 in every way, even the mediocre original campaign. Mask of the Betrayer is one of the absolute best experiences and worth it for playing through that alone. It's a shame the custom campaigns didn't take off as well as they did with the original toolset.

But then there's Storm of Zehir. Frankly, I'd rather play the OG campaign of NWN 1 than SoZ ;)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: TheRiddickWas kind of hoping for a :pick female/make :pick school :pick appearance. Witcher game. Ell well, not that I don't like Ciri, its just I was hoping for like a fresh game, maybe even good old witcher day prequel would be nice.

By the time Ciri is in her adulthood years, I doubt there is more then a handful of actual witchers left in the world.

At the end of Witcher 3, a second Conjunction of the Spheres happens. I think that will lead into a resurgence for the witchers, and the witcher creation process is altered, modernized. Ciri is a new kind of witcher.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: PyrateStill can't believe there's no proper privacy friendly alternative to Discord. Matrix/Element is the closest I found but even that one is not there yet. You'd think with the amount of devs and nerds out there, there'd be an open source alternative already, especially considering Discord is an absolute privacy nightmare. But instead they all just use Discord. It's the only invasive service I couldn't find a replacement for yet.

Speaking of, I just tried Steam's voice chat service for the first time ever on my Deck to chat with a friend... and it was immediately better than Discord's VC (audio quality, latency, stability). Steam even has a similar rooms structure where you can create text and voice channels akin to a Discord server. Unfortunately it's missing the crucial function of screensharing, this is something me and friends use a lot on Discord, so there's no chance in hell they'd consider switching over with that not implemented. I reckon after Valve is done focusing on Game Recording, that they should revisit and improve their chatting system, it has a lot of potential, especially considering the competition is just one shitty company that literally breaks GDPR by refusing to completely remove your data when you delete your account.

The problem with messaging apps is that they're useless without the user base. I might be willing to switch to a more private alternative, but the general user and really all of my friends couldn't care less and they have no reason to switch when they're happy with what they're using now.

I guess Steam has a unique position that would allow it to compete with Discord if they wanted to. In fact, I reckon the reason why Discord is as popular as it is now is because Steam's tools for messaging have historically been kind of ass and Discord filled the void. It would still be very difficult for Steam but at least doable compared to some open source alternative that's dead on arrival.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: pleasereadthemanual

Quoting: Cyba.Cowboythen the developers just aren't putting in as much effort for the Linux version.

(which wouldn't be the first time we've seen this)

Quoting: CatKillerIt's also exactly what you'd say if you couldn't be bothered to do something for a small audience and had necessarily-secret software to use as an excuse.

That's certainly true. I don't know enough about how it works to say whether an as-effective solution is feasible.

As far as I know, kernel anti-cheat is ineffective even on Windows, so I'm not sure what the devs are complaining about and what they are smoking.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

So, as a guy rocking the black dragon around here, I feel like I should be excited...but truth be told I've never been more skeptical of anything else I feel like. For one, I get the impression this tries to evoke the nostalgia a tad bit too much. Just from the trailer I was able to make out buildings, units, map pickups and features like mountains that are definitely redrawn from their originals. It's obvious. Heroes 3 is perfectly playable today however and I don't think just Heroes 3 with different graphics is what I want and what we need.
If they try and change things up, well, then there's the fact that I've been enjoying Age of Wonders 4 a lot lately. I think the devs need to have some serious might and pull off actual magic to compete now since the franchise has been frozen and AoW4 specifically has shown the mastery and experience Triumph accumulated over the years.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Maybe I am just a hopeless centrist but I do believe the most prudent decision is to just wait and see with cautious optimism. It would be nice to be pleasantly surprised for a change.

View this comment - View article - View full comments