You can sign up to get a daily email of our articles, see the Mailing List page.
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Valve are looking towards Flatpak functionality for Steam

By - | Views: 45,472
After a rumour circulated on Reddit about Valve using Flatpak in future for Steam, it was suggested by user "gutigen" that I reach out to Valve for an official comment. I now have an answer.

I asked a simple question: "People have been claiming that Valve is moving Steam to being a Flatpak package, would you be able to confirm if this is happening?"

The reply was this:
Pierre-Loup A. Griffais, ValveHi Liam,

Not quite; we're looking at some of the underlying technology to see if it would be a good fit to improve the Steam runtime environment interactions with the host system. If we went forward with it, we would be using some of the same kernel functionality Flatpak/bubblewrap is, and hopefully reusing some core code, but we have no plans to change the cross-platform distribution and packaging method at the core of Steam.

Quoted with permission.

To put that into simpler terms: they won't be using it for how they deliver the games directly, so you won't in future get games downloaded and installed as Flatpak packages, but how Steam itself is packaged and interacts with your Linux distribution may change in future.

So essentially, nothing is happening right now as it's still at the research stage. However, it is great to hear that they are actually looking to further improve Steam on Linux. Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Steam
11 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. Find me on Mastodon.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
36 comments
Page: 1/4»
  Go to:

Luke_Nukem Nov 22, 2016
This sounds exactly like they'll be replacing the included Ubunutu runtime directories with Faltpak versions of it. Likely with the aim of enabling use of multiple versions to help prevent breakage in the future.
Liam Dawe Nov 22, 2016
Quoting: LukeNukemThis sounds exactly like they'll be replacing the included Ubunutu runtime directories with Faltpak versions of it. Likely with the aim of enabling use of multiple versions to help prevent breakage in the future.
Well I hear a lot of complaints about how out of date things are in the Steam Runtime, so hopefully they will do something about that.
Spud13y Nov 22, 2016
Quoting: liamdawe
Quoting: LukeNukemThis sounds exactly like they'll be replacing the included Ubunutu runtime directories with Faltpak versions of it. Likely with the aim of enabling use of multiple versions to help prevent breakage in the future.
Well I hear a lot of complaints about how out of date things are in the Steam Runtime, so hopefully they will do something about that.

From what I heard the runtime is based off Ubuntu 12.04, which will see end of life early next year. Hopefully whatever they'll due is sooner than that and will work. At least then it'll appear Valve is still interested in Linux.
ZekThePenguin Nov 22, 2016
After basically NO news from Valve concerning Steam, it's good to hear that they are still looking to the future with Linux in mind.
MayeulC Nov 22, 2016
Pretty nice answer (and pretty nice to have an answer at all from Valve :D ). Thank you, Pierre-Loup.
Yep, Flatpack technology makes sense here, IMO. I just hope it won't make it too difficult to use more recent libraries *instead* of broken ones that might be shipped.


Last edited by MayeulC on 22 November 2016 at 8:15 pm UTC
mehari95 Nov 22, 2016
Does anyone know why they chose Flatpak over Snap?
ismaelbonato Nov 22, 2016
I vote for Snappy!
kalin Nov 22, 2016
Quoting: ismaelbonatoI vote for Snappy!
why ?
tmtvl Nov 22, 2016
Title and article aren't really meshing together, seems more like Valve is planning on doing their own take on things (problem: we have X competing standards, attempted solution: create a better standard, problem: we have X+1 competing standards).

Of course in this case it could actually work if they decide to integrate some VCS and P2P type functionalities to facilitate global rollout of updates.
Grim85 Nov 22, 2016
Quoting: ismaelbonatoI vote for Snappy!

That would be like choosing Mir over wayland
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.