Patreon Logo Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal Logo PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
We use affiliate links to earn us some pennies. Learn more.

UK gov has "no plans to intervene" with payment processors pressuring stores to remove games

By -
Last updated: 8 Oct 2025 at 1:58 pm UTC

With the ongoing drama from the likes of Steam and itch.io getting hit by payment processors for hosting certain adult games, the UK government say pretty clearly they will not get involved.

In the UK we have a dedicated government petitions website, where any UK citizen can ask the government to do something. When a petition hits at least 10,000 verified signatures, the government has to respond. If it hits 100,000 then it gets considered for a debate in parliament.

There's an ongoing petition titled "Ban payment processors stopping services based on objections to legal content", which notes:

There are reports that payment processing companies have recently placed pressure on companies that rely on their services, pressuring them to remove legitimate content.

Because there are a small number of major payment processing companies, we believe this poses an unacceptable threat to small businesses and private individuals, and undermines democratic free speech through censorship from unaccountable companies.

At some point recently that petition managed to reach over the 10K threshold (12,362 at time of writing), and so the UK government responded on October 6th:

The Government recognises the important role payments plays in supporting a resilient, diverse and growing economy. The Government is committed to ensuring that the UK’s payment system works for all, allowing businesses and customers to transact with confidence.

The Government recognises that it is important for businesses to have greater choice in the forms of payment that they can accept. The National Payments Vision, published in November 2024, set out the Government’s ambition for a world-leading payments ecosystem, where consumers and businesses have a choice of payment methods to meet their needs. A key part of this ambition is the continued development of Open Banking, which enables consumers to make purchases using a wider range of payment methods, including account-to-account payments, thereby increasing competition in the payments sector. HM Treasury is working closely with the financial services regulators to deliver these outcomes.

Decisions regarding which businesses payment processors contract with are a commercial matter, taking into account the relevant requirements on the firm. These decisions will be influenced by a variety of factors, and the Government has no plans to intervene in those commercial decisions.

The petition ends 26th February, 2026.

Seems there's going to be no easy solution to this, aside from finding some alternative payment processors that won't kick up a fuss about certain adult content. Complaining directly to the payment processors might help too.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Misc
7 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
All posts need to follow our rules. Please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Readers can also email us for any issues or concerns.
10 comments Subscribe

Pyronick 2 days ago
Ah, the UK, the nation that invented appeasement, and now perfects it by appeasing U.S. Big Fintech, trading the sovereignty of its digital storefronts for “peace in our time.”

Truly, some national traditions just refuse to die.
Leahi84 2 days ago
Yeah. Anyone who expected the incompetent and spineless UK government to do anything was not paying attention to reality. The only valid reason I can give them for not wanting to wade into this is that I have to imagine the credit card processors would unload massive lawsuits against the government over any attempted regulations.

The U.S. government won't do anything either because the MAGA party (formerly the Republicans) is in the pocket of the evangelicals who want adult content banned. It's really hard not to feel like we're all screwed.


Last edited by Leahi84 on 8 Oct 2025 at 2:39 pm UTC
Kimyrielle 2 days ago
User Avatar
Tbh, I have extremely little faith in the UK government getting anything right, so I wasn't expecting it taking up a fight with American mega-corporations and drawing Trump's ire in the process.

I guess the expectation rather was to send a message to the HQs of said mega-corps, telling them to remain mindful of not creating too much ill will among gamers or risk them doing some more harm to their brand. I am pretty sure they did not expect the reaction being as harsh as it was. Most people are sheep, after all. It takes a bit for so many to show up and sign petitions like this one.
Eike 2 days ago
  • Supporter Plus
A key part of this ambition is the continued development of Open Banking, which enables consumers to make purchases using a wider range of payment methods, including account-to-account payments

This sounds reasonable to me.
Shouldn't be an incredible hard thing to do either.
eggrole 2 days ago
User Avatar
/dons_conspiracy_theorist_hat

IMHO all this payment processing for adult content is the thin end of the wedge to eventually lead to the complete linking of real ID to digital identity. "If you want to buy adult games, provide your online ID to prove you are 18+." This is the old "think of the children" tactic, and sadly I bet it will work.

Fast forward a few years and it will be normal to have you digital ID for everything under the sun.

Is this really hard to believe given all the digital ID stuff that has been cropping up coincidentally at exactly the same time as the payment processor hoopla?
TheRiddick a day ago
User Avatar
If they say they won't be doing a thing. It basically means, yeah, they will!
Phlebiac a day ago
including account-to-account payments

I'm not in the UK (USA), but I've noticed some online payments (non-commerce, bill paying type systems, which are probably less prone to fraud) are starting to offer ACH / direct bank account transfers. I've had zero desire to give any of them that info, but I have no doubt it saves them quite a bit of money, avoiding the dozens of middlemen involved with credit card processing.
Pyronick a day ago
This is the old "think of the children" tactic, and sadly I bet it will work.
Sadly, you're right, and I suspect it’ll be exploited for even more sinister agendas like “Chat Control” or outright bans on encryption.
Ironically, that kind of overreach will just push things further underground, and what resurfaces there won’t be petty crime anymore.

IMHO all this payment processing for adult content is the thin end of the wedge to eventually lead to the complete linking of real ID to digital identity. "If you want to buy adult games, provide your online ID to prove you are 18+."
Honestly, I’m not opposed to digital identity in principle. Most of us in Western nations already have one, it just isn’t universally exposed, except where the law requires it.

What matters is how it’s implemented. I’d much rather see something like the Dutch Idemix-based IRMA (“I Reveal My Attributes”) system, or the upcoming EU digital identity framework, where you can prove specific attributes (like being 18+ with a simple yes or no) without exposing your entire identity, or more than necessary.

That’s the sane, privacy-preserving way forward, not some government or corporate free-for-all with your personal data.

The fact (or perhaps even the reason) that these digital identity systems keep being delayed is, imho, deeply suspicious. It creates the perfect window to push through invasive measures like “Chat Control” or even outright bans on encryption, steps that would inevitably open the door for a free democratic state to slide into a police state, and eventually, full-blown authoritarianism.


Last edited by Pyronick on 9 Oct 2025 at 5:25 am UTC
ptkato a day ago
Account-to-account payments is the way since it sidesteps the problematic payment processors completely, the governments just need to withstand the pressuring lobbies that are against it. Brazil has one called PIX [External Link] and it works great.


Last edited by ptkato on 9 Oct 2025 at 5:53 pm UTC
Klaas 13 hours ago
Regarding Chat Control. The recent attempt to introduce it EU wide by von der Leyen (she already tried this several times on the German level which violates the constitution with the “think of the children” hammer) has been postponed.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon Logo Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal Logo PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register