Patreon Logo Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal Logo PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
We use affiliate links to earn us some pennies. Learn more.

California law to require operating systems to check your age

By -
Last updated: 2 Mar 2026 at 12:12 pm UTC

The time of age assurance is upon us, and not just for social media - for operating systems too and that includes Linux as well of course.

News currently doing the rounds is California law AB-1043 "Age verification signals: software applications and online services" that comes into effect January 1, 2027 that will require operating systems and app stores to get your age and be able to somehow signal that age to applications when they request it.

From the bill:

This bill, beginning January 1, 2027, would require, among other things related to age verification with respect to software applications, an operating system provider, as defined, to provide an accessible interface at account setup that requires an account holder, as defined, to indicate the birth date, age, or both, of the user of that device for the purpose of providing a signal regarding the user’s age bracket to applications available in a covered application store and to provide a developer, as defined, who has requested a signal with respect to a particular user with a digital signal via a reasonably consistent real-time application programming interface regarding whether a user is in any of several age brackets, as prescribed. The bill would require a developer to request a signal with respect to a particular user from an operating system provider or a covered application store when the application is downloaded and launched.

This bill would prohibit an operating system provider or a covered application store from using data collected from a third party in an anticompetitive manner, as specified.

This bill would punish noncompliance with a civil penalty to be enforced by the Attorney General, as prescribed.

This bill would declare its provisions to be severable.

Reading through the bill details, it doesn't seem to demand any ID scanning or anything like that. The text makes it pretty clear they want "nonpersonally identifiable data" taken from your birth date to have you placed into age brackets like under 13, under 16 or at least 18.

This is very US / California specific of course but still applies worldwide to any operating system that has downloads available in California, and continues the trend we've seen elsewhere against social media platforms from various countries (like the unpopular changes with Discord). All in the name of protecting children. This in a way seems a lot more invasive though, considering this age checking is now making its way into your PC directly. It starts with asking for your birth date, but how long before they want more - and for other places to create similar laws? It's a slippery slope.

What we may end up seeing is the likes of GNOME, KDE Plasma and other deskop environments just add in a simple date picker for your age on account creation, or some kind of statement on their downloads page on how it's not to be used in California perhaps.

It would be interesting to see how this type of law could go after Linux distributions if they don't have any age checking at all in place, especially since accounts already created before July 2027 will need to have something in place so you can go back and add your age.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Misc
13 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
All posts need to follow our rules. Please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Readers can also email us for any issues or concerns.
37 comments
Page: 2/2
  Go to:

Jarmer 5 hours ago
User Avatar
Quoting: Eocene84As someone who doesn't have kids (thank God) and never will, I'm really tired of being punished because other people can't or won't parent their children, which makes the government feel the need to step in. Hopefully the state I live in, Colorado, doesn't do something like this.
This has nothing to do with parents properly parenting their kids or not. This is all about control and consolidation of power. Taking the power away from the individual and putting that power into the hands of the gov to tell you what you can and can't do. This is just one tiny aspect of the overall goal. The gov doesn't give two shits about parenting.

so instead of you going about your day doing whatever you want with your computers and websites, now you have to check in with the gov and ask them if it's okay if you go about your day doing whatever you were doing. Then they can tell you yes or no. They have the power now, and you have lost your freedom. Yay Murica.

Last edited by Jarmer on 2 Mar 2026 at 2:55 pm UTC
Mohandevir 4 hours ago
I think that we will discover there are a lot of users born on 1/1/2008 out there. 🤔😁
Jarmer 4 hours ago
User Avatar
^ LOL I always do the earliest date possibly in the picker. So I was often born on January 1st, 1901. I've seen some stuff man.
Andy Gneiss 4 hours ago
Is it just me or does anytime you hear "age bracket" you think about advertising (and/or taxes)? I really want this bill to go away. It sets a bad precedent, or maybe a gateway for worse. Perhaps it's intended to be a "good enough" solution to a pretend problem so that we don't get an even worse solution, but I agree that it's a slippery slope.

If I had to compromise, I might annoyingly settle for a checkbox for being under/over the age of majority. Any more than that binary option is giving away data that doesn't need to be given away. Does age bracket info fall under any US data privacy laws, like HIPAA? Will every single website that requests your age bracket be required to follow HIPAA data security requirements?
Lachu 4 hours ago
I am above 18, so I will tell: I have 120 years - no matter how old I am. Does telling your age should not be prohibited? Why Google, MS and other should known, how old you are?
Quoting: Eocene84As someone who doesn't have kids (thank God) and never will, I'm really tired of being punished because other people can't or won't parent their children, which makes the government feel the need to step in. Hopefully the state I live in, Colorado, doesn't do something like this.
I always told: add special tag to http, so it will inform material is for adult. Parents will install special browser on children PC, which will cut every material marked with that tag. No nonsense law!
StalePopcorn 4 hours ago
#ExcludeCalifornia in the EULAs
Seegras 4 hours ago
Quoting: pb
Quoting: doragasuAnd what about my smart light bulb? Will it have to verify my age to turn on?
Your light bulb will stream the picture to the central server where AI will evaluate your age. If you're <18, The light will automatically turn off at 22:00 so you get a proper rest before school.
Also, it will have the wrong time zone, and thus turn off the lights between 15:00 and 03:00
CyborgZeta 3 hours ago
As someone who lives in the US, this is one of those issues that would be bipartisan. Make no mistake, I expect legislation like this to pop up in "red states" like Texas, Florida or Tennessee; if they haven't already.
GoEsr 3 hours ago
User Avatar
It's funny that almost every article on this has focused on it including Linux but it's clearly aimed at Windows and MacOS. The bill doesn't actually define what an "operating system" actually means. It specifies that this applies to "account holders" but what does that actually mean? It's fairly obvious what it means in desktop environments, but TTYs? Is root an account holder? How old is root, the number of days since you installed your distro?
Klaas 2 hours ago
There is the danger that this will stop the possibility of disabling secure boot. I'm not happy about that.
rhavenn 2 hours ago
This is punishing businesses / OSes with bullshit work and potential fines. The only way this law works is if someone actually checks you put in the right info (people lie; shocker right???) and fines you / throws you in jail and it can't get anymore 1984 than that.

This really smells like the old DRM days with CDs and export restrictions on encryption. Honestly, I'd just switch to a distro that has a "non-US" version download and get on my with my day. Fuck California and any politician who uses "think of the children" for this sort of invasive bullshit.
MayeulC 2 hours ago
Lots of alarmed comments in here. I agree that it's a slippery slope, but in practice this seems like a good idea to ask OSes to provide an API for this, especially for age brackets (prevents tracking if any user worth tracking is "over 18" -- this may make for a neat tracker blocker if you just need to input a lower age).

Now, the title make it sound like the "verification" is privacy invasive, but if it's just a mechanism to store the age in account data, provided at account creation time, there are many ways to implement this: new field in /etc/passwd, or new config file. Provide /proc/is_user_over18 or some D-Bus API provided by the DE. Could be a new "portal".

I don't see any "official / secure verification service" being enforced, so if it's just another picker besides "time zone" or "keyboard layout", fine by me. If they start mandating something else though... Slippery slope, as I said (though we could use key-signing parties for that).

This could make it trivial for parents to setup a very basic parental control system, and could avoid all these popups about "are you 18+" on Steam and other websites.

Thank you Liam for your accurate reporting, though the headline is still a bit click baity. I would say "require OSes to provide|share your age".

Last edited by MayeulC on 2 Mar 2026 at 5:46 pm UTC
ElectricPrism 2 hours ago
This issue is about Internet Censorship.

The mechanisms are being laid down to track and eliminate anyone who criticises a unpopular nation state. And to eliminate people's ability to share "upsetting footage" of things happening in the world.

This is also a war on the younger generation to raise them "jacked-in" to sharing everythign with "The Cloud" stored at your local AI Data Center and to fix Microsoft, pentagon contractor, loosing their grip on customers as their popularity has declined in the last decade.

Notice how various states across the globe are moving on this in lockstep.
Jarmer 1 hour ago
User Avatar
^ also tie that directly into how the current US republican gov wants to utterly destroy all trans people. It makes me want to vomit.

If a young person interested in transitioning were allowed to use a computer to access a website that might help them learn about that process in a healthy way, then how else could the republicans destroy their entire life starting right then and there unless they had lockdown access and tracking on everything all the time! WONT SOMEBODY THINK OF THE RICH OLD STRAIGHT WHITE CHRISTIAN MALES IN THE GOP. HORRORS.
GustyGhost 23 minutes ago
A group of people who wouldn't be able to articulate what an operating system is attempt to legislate an anti-feature into operating systems.

We may find that this push only effectuates change in big vendor commercial operating systems, in part because those pushing it are only aware of the cattle feed they eat i.e. iOS Android Windows Mac.

Still, I would hold on to all those old Linux distro installation ISOs just in case.
Johnologue 18 minutes ago
Not quite as bad as their new government-approved 3D printer bill but hey, it's nice they're trying to give it competition.
Highball 14 minutes ago
Quoting: ElectricPrismThis issue is about Internet Censorship.

The mechanisms are being laid down to track and eliminate anyone who criticises a unpopular nation state. And to eliminate people's ability to share "upsetting footage" of things happening in the world.

This is also a war on the younger generation to raise them "jacked-in" to sharing everythign with "The Cloud" stored at your local AI Data Center and to fix Microsoft, pentagon contractor, loosing their grip on customers as their popularity has declined in the last decade.

Notice how various states across the globe are moving on this in lockstep.
Exactly. It doesn't matter if this law has no teeth and it's easily fooled. The law makers don't care and they never would care. What they care about, is getting the law on the books. After the law is on the books, that's when they start adding teeth.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon Logo Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal Logo PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register