While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:
Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.
This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.
This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register
- Founder of Baldur's Gate 3 developer blasts publisher greed
- Proton 9.0 (Beta16) brings more regression fixes, updated Steamworks SDK
- Windows compatibility layer Wine 9.5 released
- Backpack Battles has sold 500,000 copies in two weeks on Steam
- System76 release upgraded Lemur Pro laptop, plus a desktop sale now on
- > See more over 30 days here
-
EA anticheat arrives for Battlefield V in April, will b…
- Purple Library Guy -
SDL 3 will prefer Wayland Over X11, if certain protocol…
- nwildner -
SDL 3 will prefer Wayland Over X11, if certain protocol…
- whizse -
SDL 3 will prefer Wayland Over X11, if certain protocol…
- fenglengshun -
EA anticheat arrives for Battlefield V in April, will b…
- EagleDelta - > See more comments
Latest Forum Posts
yesterday I did a quick test with DiRT Really. After realizing the game creates incredible fps rates on my system (GTX 970, i7 6700K, Xubuntu 16.10 with nvidia binary driver 378.13) I set every thing to ultra and did a in-game benchmark. The result:
Aver: 108,98 fps
Min: 87,46 fps
Max: 159,02 fps
If I compare this with a test like the following I'm really surprised:
https://us.hardware.info/reviews/6277/3/dirt-rally-review-tested-with-32-gpus-testnresults-full-hd-1920x1080
They had got only 85,6 fps for a GTX 970. I think on average. This is below my minimum fps rate!
My question: Is Linux missing again some graphic properties or is the OpenGL port of DiRT Rally actually faster than the original DirectX version? I think I've missed something, do I?
View PC info
7 December 2015 (wikipedia and the date on the benchmark website says Tuesday October 20, 2015. By now the windows version has seen multiple updates increasing performance, so Feral had a improved codebase base to build upon over the release version. I think if you compare the latest versions, windows may achieve higher framerates.
Yes, this could be. Do you have an actual Windows benchmark?
You mean this:
https://www.gamingonlinux.com/articles/start-your-engines-as-dirt-rally-is-now-on-linux-port-report-review.9223/page=3#r87093
But my fps rates are much higher. On the same level as Windows in Jahimself's benchmark. And my resolution is 1920x1080 not only 1440x900.
So a bit odd. He also uses an old driver and an experimental driver under Linux Mint. I'm using the latest stable one: 378.13. Also I use a strongly stripped window manager (Xubuntu / Xfce) with composite turned off.
Where can I set MSAA to 4, 8 or 16? I only see options with low, middle, high and ultra.