While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:
Reward Tiers:
Patreon. Plain Donations:
PayPal.
This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Reward Tiers:
This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register
- Linux and open source getting age checking exemptions could be problematic
- Steam Deck stock returns but there's a big price increase
- Dusklight the reimplementation of The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess gets a major update
- Proton-CachyOS adds low latency layer and Discord rich presence support
- Flathub moves to ban nearly all apps and submissions made with generative AI
- > See more over 30 days here
- Shop Crush - Psychological Horror Thrift Sim with Literal Illusio…
- hollowlimb - Fully native alternative to ProtonDB
- PlayingOnLinuxphone - Feedback needed - future website updates
- Liam Squires-Hand - New Desktop Screenshot Thread
- Hamish - Restrict way kernel-level-anti-cheat is installed.
- PlayingOnLinuxphone - See more posts
Anticheat check - which competitive games actually work on Linux?
How to give Valve feedback when Proton games have issues on Linux / SteamOS
So... what does that imply for Fedora, the GNOME project, etc.?
All I can say at this point is that for what you might call sentimental reasons, I don't want to use a system that has IBM's direct corporate backing.
On the flip-side, yes, IBM could also spoil it as well.
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/red-hat-ibm-creating-leading-hybrid-cloud-provider
While IBM is a big Linux contributor I'm not sure they will continue to sponsor all the desktop development Red Hat is doing, especially as the whole acquisition is part of some cloudy cloud strategy.
Interesting times.
Having been through acquisitions and mergers in the corporate world, usually what follows is reorganization and clearing out the cruft. Do expect some changes. This can be good or bad. Same thing happened at SuSE, in fact, some of those people ended up at Red Hat.
What's next? SuSE to be acquired by Intel? Ubuntu acquired by Microsoft?
This news is not a good one for me.
Ubuntu acquired by Microsoft is a real fear of mine as of today. In fact, I am wondering if IBM beat MS to the punch regarding Red Hat.
All in all, I'm trying to keep a "wait and see" attitude about the IBM acquisition of Red Hat. I can't say I'm happy about it, but I don't think it's a tale of doom either. If you read the forum comments over at Phoronix, it's pretty pessimistic. But you can also gleam some positive info like how much IBM has contributed to the Linux kernel.
In light of this, I find it interesting that the Mint devs found it worthwhile to start working on this whenever they did. I guess people have been worried/cautious about how Canonical handle things for a while now.
Also to the previous comment , wasn;'t Suse acquired already ?
IBM has actually done a lot to help linux over the years. It has provided lots of code and funding. It also stood up to SCO when they tried to claim copyright to all the UNIX code within linux.
From what I read, they are interested in the cloud computing part of RedHat, they will probably let the rest run business as usual as long as it is generating a profit.
In addition, there is always CentOS which is a distro that is essentially Red Hat Advanced Server Linux minus the cost. Even if something did change, CentOS would probably get rid of the crap. (even though they kept SystemD)