Latest 30 Comments

Quoting: ArehandoroI'd consider Blade Runner a traditional point&click :)

Hard to say, Lucas Arts SCUMM engine itself was initially about 2D adventure games, but in practice it was something more like a programming basis, same way ScummVM may be more than just about adventure games.

But overall I'd say majority of ScummVM games are still adventure games.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Purple Library Guy

Quoting: wit_as_a_riddleI find the moral indignation over what others do with their own hard earned money to be performative.

That sounds like it makes sense, but it's ludicrous. So, Geoffrey Epstein spent his own hard earned money on sex with underage girls. I am morally indignant about that. Not you, though, that would be "performative".

That sounds like it makes sense, but it's ludicrous! The morally repugnant issue is sex with underage girls, spending money on it or not is irrelevant.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: hardpenguinHow about you disable them by default, Mozilla, and have people unleash AI at their own peril -_-

This is dumb. So dumb.

I would like to think the majority of users would want it all turned off. But honestly, I'd not be willing to stake anything significant on that being true.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Shmerl

Quoting: ArehandoroAren't all supported games in ScummVM traditional graphic adventures (~point& click)?

Initially and most of them are, but they branched out into more types, like Blade Runner.

I'd consider Blade Runner a traditional point&click :)

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: ArehandoroAren't all supported games in ScummVM traditional graphic adventures (~point& click)?

Initially and most of them are, but they branched out into more types, like Blade Runner.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: GeamanduraThis was always an amazing project to provide a 2D adventure game engine, but I genuinely don't understand what are they doing now with including separate engines for running a 3D game Penumbra. At this point what stops them from e.g. including OpenMW, including the Heroes 2 and Heroes 3 open source engines, etc.? What is the purpose of this project morphing into a bundle of their initial vision engine plus more and more unrelated random shit?

Aren't all supported games in ScummVM traditional graphic adventures (~point& click)?

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Oh, Penumbra. Nice.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

This won't block Google AI to intrude into your searches.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

how about having a separate build of firefox without telemetry and ai slop

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I'll never use vanilla ff again because of mozilla's disastrous management decisions, but this at least I like because I *think* it'll make it easier for the various forks like zen / libre / etc to just disable remove all this bullshit?

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: ExpalphalogAtom just didn't hit for me and I don't know why. I love tactical CRPGs. I love the old Fallout games. I love the first two Wasteland games (haven't gotten around to trying 3 yet). I played Atom for around 23 hours and then quit though, which is very rare for me. Usually I either abandon games within the first 3 hours or I play them all the way through barring game-breaking bugs.

You gotta give #3 a go! It's SOOOO GOOD. I didn't like the overworld traversal all that much, but EVERYTHING else is so well done. The humor is great, and it's got such a good power creep. Mid-game when your builds finally start shining it's just crazy fun to unleash all hell in random encounters.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Nic264

Quoting: hardpenguinHow about you disable them by default, Mozilla, and have people unleash AI at their own peril -_-

This is dumb. So dumb.

What's dumb about translations and OCR?

Blind hatred for anything labeled with “AI” is as pointless as hatred for anything that uses linked lists.

Translations and OCR are not the things that have caused the hatred.

And you know. Stop playing dumb.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I'll be the one to say it:

Consider all those who got gassed up on the cyclical $NEW_WINDOWS bad streak who tried out Linux on their gaming computers, only to feel overwhelmed or burned or whatever by the differences (of which newbies will always make mountains out of mole hills) who then promptly return to the familiarity of Windows.

I suspect we'll see another small decrease next month too.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

I've been having loads of fun in Valheim. The game feels complete and polished as far as I'm concerned. Not sure what they're waiting for to finally drop "early access".

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: scaine[Duckduckgo did a survey](https://voteyesornoai.com/) asking their userbase if they wanted AI features. They closed the poll after a week or so, 175K votes counted, and 90% said no, they don't want AI.

Yes, it's very skewed - DDG's userbase is privacy-focused. But "tiny but super vocal butt-hurt minority" is a shitty and antagonistic way to describes people's perfectly valid dislike of this planet-burning technology.

Asking in good faith: If non-local AI features were able to operate in an ecologically viable way, would you then not dislike AI? Are there other aspects about ML/AI that keep you from engaging with it?

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: PaldinoXYeah yeah, when are we getting a REAL statement on the AI thing GOG?

Never probably.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: kaimanImproving on the Civilization formula is really not that simple. Change it too much and people complain it's no longer Civilization. Change it too little and people see no reason to upgrade from the previous installment.

That's, in short, what's wrong with today's AAA gaming segment. They constantly fix what's not broken, just to get an excuse to release full-price updates of existing games.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: AzzurraIrisLeaMondeHow many moms do you have? 👀

Oh dear, only the one, but apparently I have a surplus of s-keys on my keyboard 😄

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: GeamanduraThis was always an amazing project to provide a 2D adventure game engine, but I genuinely don't understand what are they doing now with including separate engines for running a 3D game Penumbra. At this point what stops them from e.g. including OpenMW, including the Heroes 2 and Heroes 3 open source engines, etc.? What is the purpose of this project morphing into a bundle of their initial vision engine plus more and more unrelated random shit?

What I think happened is that the HPL1 engine was in pretty bad shape. Outdated third party dependencies, hard to compile on modern platforms etc. There doesn't seem to be much activity on the GitHub page for the initial source release, and no active forks I could find so clearly some heavy TLC needed.

Presumably ScummVM already have a lots of tools needed for any game, input/sound, handling savegames, built with portability in mind and so on, and with 3D support already there with the Residual merger I guess it was less work integrating it with ScummVM than doing a total rewrite?

FWIW: It was started as a GSoC back in 2022:
https://blogs.scummvm.org/grisenti/2022/09/11/gsoc-summary/

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: sanBring back memories of another Road Rash remake a while ago called Road Redemption.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/300380/Road_Redemption/

Wow. That's a very modernized update to Road Rash's look. Stunning visuals. It includes a Native Linux version too.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: GeamanduraWhat is the purpose of this project morphing into a bundle of their initial vision engine plus more and more unrelated random shit?

Well, from a user's perspective, not having to keep track of ten thousand little projects is kind of valuable.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Cool demo, but I hope in the final release they add a dark mode. I get migraines easily by looking at white screens for too long so I had to stop playing the game pretty quick.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

All this so called "backlash" has been for nothing LMAO... From the very beginning Mozilla said they would do this even BEFORE the "backlash" started.. but NO ONE took the time to ACTUALLY read their initial announcement. We live in the age of rage bait and people reading a headline and NOTHING else. Now granted Mozilla should be disabling them by default but it is what it is

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: scaine

Quoting: _wojteksadly tiny but super vocal butt-hurt minority

[Duckduckgo did a survey](https://voteyesornoai.com/) asking their userbase if they wanted AI features. They closed the poll after a week or so, 175K votes counted, and 90% said no, they don't want AI.

Yes, it's very skewed - DDG's userbase is privacy-focused. But "tiny but super vocal butt-hurt minority" is a shitty and antagonistic way to describes people's perfectly valid dislike of this planet-burning technology.

@Eike summed it up perfectly.

Also, you yourself point only to DDG survey where most likely only those hell-bent on anti-AI crusade participated (because it was shared in certain places) :D

Probably the most reliable thing would be to force the survey to all Fx users to get the correct trends but the… they kinda already have that and it's called tellemetry and they can see if the current AI features are used or not and they probably make the decission based on that.

Of course the same vocal minority was butt-hurt about telemetry back in the day and gladly turned it off just to voice their disconent later on.

All in all, Mozilla DID address the issue in a quite nice and elegant way.
The setting will be permanent and apply to all feature AI features.

It will probably be featured in "what's new" after the update so everyone affected will be able to turn it off. Why the heck still complain about what they did???

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

It is a good thing many people complained about the AI additions. If we didn't complain, then the disable feature would never have been implemented or if it was you would never find it. They would add it to some config file.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: scaine

Quoting: _wojteksadly tiny but super vocal butt-hurt minority

[Duckduckgo did a survey](https://voteyesornoai.com/) asking their userbase if they wanted AI features. They closed the poll after a week or so, 175K votes counted, and 90% said no, they don't want AI.

Yes, it's very skewed - DDG's userbase is privacy-focused. But "tiny but super vocal butt-hurt minority" is a shitty and antagonistic way to describes people's perfectly valid dislike of this planet-burning technology.

_wojtek spoke about those that still spread hate even with being able to easily turn it off. I don't think this can be associated with all people not wanting AI active in their browsers.

Yes, there's still reasons to dislike it. But hey, if nearly nobody wants AI, nearly nobody's gonna use it, right?

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: Aaron SparksA very small downtick from people that switched and ran away at the first sight of trouble or realized they couldn’t play battlefield 6 maybe?🤣 At least globally user count is up.

The survey is not exact enough to look at every 0.1% up or down. Better look at whole years.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Improving on the Civilization formula is really not that simple. Change it too much and people complain it's no longer Civilization. Change it too little and people see no reason to upgrade from the previous installment.

Perhaps with some things there comes a point where they are as perfect as can be, and any change will only make them worse. Though I guess plenty people will argue that Civilization VI wasn't at that point yet.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Quoting: _wojteksadly tiny but super vocal butt-hurt minority

[Duckduckgo did a survey](https://voteyesornoai.com/) asking their userbase if they wanted AI features. They closed the poll after a week or so, 175K votes counted, and 90% said no, they don't want AI.

Yes, it's very skewed - DDG's userbase is privacy-focused. But "tiny but super vocal butt-hurt minority" is a shitty and antagonistic way to describes people's perfectly valid dislike of this planet-burning technology.

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment

Took them long enough...

View this comment - View article - View full comments - Report this comment