I tried demos of Unbound: World Apart and Werewolf: The Apocalypse — Heart of the Forest

- Unbound has some very nice graphics and atmosphere, and some clever puzzles, but I tend to get a little bored after a while. If you enjoy this kind of game, you should definitely give it a try though.

- Werewolf, well, I tried it because it was the only visual novel-like game that made me install it and want to play it, but it is too slow. Nice atmosphere though.

- Once more, I made a friend discover Overcooked [External Link]. This game never disappoint :smile:

- Finally, I bought Undead Horde on sale, and this game has got me hooked the whole Sunday. It's a simple gameplay, but very fun (and way easier than Iratus :smile:)

As for the gamepad, my several Xbox 360 controllers work perfectly, even the one included with my Xbox 360, around 15 years ago. I do have an Xbox One controller as well (the lovely Sea of Thieves edition [External Link] :wub:), but the detachable cable tend to cause disconnections, and on wireless mode, some buttons are not mapped properly (notably the map button), which is why I still rely on the trusty 360s.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

No much time to play this week (did a few more runs on Wizard of Legend), but, like Liam, Children of Morta and switching from Manjaro to EndeavourOS are on my ToDo list :smile:

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: DrakkerWow, weapons will randomly jam. What a nice feature, I always wanted to get killed in a game because my weapon jammed, sounds like so much fun! (Not.)

I know that Synthetik: Legion Rising also has a Weapon Jam mechanic [External Link]. In this rogue-like game with perma-death, it adds a bit of stress, to spice things up ;)

You might as well compare it to a "silenced", "staggered", or "blinded" mechanic from other game: not being able to shoot for a short time may keep you on your toes and look for alternatives (i.e. cover / hideout) in case things go wrong, instead of just plain run & gun. It depends on how the mechanic is implemented and how often it triggers :wink:

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Purple Library Guy

Quoting: furaxhornyxWhich usually end up on some obscure command line (so modern... :whistle:)

Speaking as someone who generally avoids the command line, when it comes to troubleshooting I prefer it. It's a lot easier to follow instructions to do command line stuff than to do GUI stuff, and it tends to be a lot less subject to change between versions. And it's more powerful for that kind of thing. So to me, the Windows tendency for troubleshooting instructions to be based on doing some weird tucked away GUI thing is a weakness rather than a strength.

We'll have to agree to disagree on that one :wink: (I could develop more, but I feel like it's not the right place to do so)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Same here, just finished the demo. It was quite a nice experience, I'll add it to wishlist for now :smile:

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Avehicle7887Got back to dying in Dead Cells, it has been a while since last I played it and there's been huge amount of content since then.

When I am done with unlocking everything back in Wizard of Legend, I will probably go back to Dead Cells and discover the last few DLC contents (or die trying :whistle:). I only made 1 playthrough since The Bad Seed, so there's probably a lot more to discover now.

Edit: just finished the demo of Domino House , and you should probably give it a try if you haven't done so yet :wink:

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: GuestAn example? Sure, every non-windows program, including the drivers. All the stuff that used to come on CDs. Then the stuff to overclock your hardware, the countless programs to clean windows, antivirus or browsers. (though i guess people just use edge and windows defender now) I don't understand how it's less fragmented than what we have.

Yet your initial statement was that were no fragmentation (emphasis mine):

Quoting: GuestThere is no fragmentation. On Windows every program every secon pwrusr g4m3r uses is a third party program that offers next to no integration to the supposedly "non-fragmented" desktop/toolchain.

The difference being, a program for Windows targets a version, not a flavour. Which means that it will work, no matter if you are running Windows <insert version here> Home / Pro / Business. On Linux, packages exists for some distributions only (if any), and after then it is up to the user to sort things to make it work.

Quoting: GuestYou are not forced to run a kde/gnome/xfce/openbox frankendesktop, you can just as well run one of them and pretend the others don't exist, same as on windows.

I have seen plenty of threads on forums where someone asked how to do this and that, and usually, the first answer was along the lines of : "which DE are you using ?" or "I don't know for <insert DE #1>, but on <insert DE #2>, do [...]"
Which usually end up on some obscure command line (so modern... :whistle:) which may also target a certain distro (aka "sudo apt-get [..]" which is royally ignored on Manjaro and stuff...)

Quoting: GuestFor games all of this stuff is largely unimportant, since they will only use a handful of libs like sdl to interact with your window manager/DE of choice. and any version mismatch can be bridged by the way steam and gog handle these things. It won't eliminate all possible errors under the sun but that's avoided by the existing approach to pick one officially supported distro for a game.

This is exactly the point: developers end up resorting to targeting one (or a few) distro, and it's up to the users to check how to install missing stuff on their specific distro (aka "not out-of-the-box experience"). They cannot simply target, say, Linux 5.4 (or whatever is the latest stable kernel version) like they target Windows 10. Also, package names tend to change between distros, so the user has to double-check the package name in his distro.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: CatKiller

Quoting: brokeassbenI'm having frequent complete system freezes that require a hard reset and nothing I've tried so far is helping. Different drives, entirely different distros, updated the BIOS, tested RAM, and still freezing. Sooo damn frustrating.

Power supply is the next item on your checklist.

In addition to CatKiller suggestion, you may also want to try setting a fixed voltage for your CPU, closest to the "auto" setting. I remember having to do that on "cheap" motherboard, and setting a fixed value solved the problems for me. Might be worth a try. Also, check the CPU temperature, in these hot days ; you may want to try underclocking the CPU a little, and see if it improves stability.

As for me, this week I tried again to make a Windows VM work for music making. After a lot of trouble installing all Windows 7 updates from all those years, I found out that my motherboard makes it difficult to passthrough my USB audio card. So, I may end up buying a dedicated PCI USB controller to make it easier. In any case, I am making a lot of notes on what to look for for my future PC upgrade :smile:

So, I gave up for now and I (finally) went back to Wizard of Legend [External Link]. I had not play for a long time, so it was nice to see all the new stuff (and boss !) they added to the game. What was less nice it that my saved game was wiped, so, time to unlock everything one more time I guess :whistle:

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Purple Library Guy

Quoting: furaxhornyx

Quoting: GuestAs for support, all is really needed is that they figure out a base set of (external) libraries they want/need to support. And steam/gog provides them that already, so even them targeting ancient library versions are not a problem anymore.

To my mind every single dev/publisher that figured out that steam can ship their version of libraries and that it is enough to support one distribution to satisfy 99% of linux gamers has done a good enough job. This has nothing to do with how many desktop environments and how many "linux" distro flavours are out there.

99% seems a bit optimistic, if we look at the GOL statistics (assuming of course that those statistics are representative)

Not the point being made. He's not saying nobody uses other distros. He's saying that by and large those other distros, if their users are likely to have the faintest interest in gaming, will ensure that the Steam approach will work on their distro. So game developers code to Steam's de facto standard of what libraries to use and such, distros make sure that works, 99% of Linux gamers find games work. Thus, functionally not fragmentation.
Note that I don't know if this is true, I'm just trying to make sure you're not talking past each other.

Thank you for the clarification ; English is not my native langage, so I read it like "[...]it is enough to support one distribution to satisfy 99% of linux gamers"

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Guest

Quoting: randylThe one thing I hope comes out of this summit is a better way forward for application development. Our diversity is one of our greatest strengths and weaknesses (due to fragmentation). I feel like we're often so worried about courting Windows and Mac users and making our software available to their platforms that we've neglected the deep fragmentation in our own.

There is no fragmentation. On Windows every program every secon pwrusr g4m3r uses is a third party program that offers next to no integration to the supposedly "non-fragmented" desktop/toolchain.

Could you give an example of such third-party program ?

Quoting: GuestAs for support, all is really needed is that they figure out a base set of (external) libraries they want/need to support. And steam/gog provides them that already, so even them targeting ancient library versions are not a problem anymore.

To my mind every single dev/publisher that figured out that steam can ship their version of libraries and that it is enough to support one distribution to satisfy 99% of linux gamers has done a good enough job. This has nothing to do with how many desktop environments and how many "linux" distro flavours are out there.

99% seems a bit optimistic, if we look at the GOL statistics (assuming of course that those statistics are representative)

View this comment - View article - View full comments