The sound of inevitability, Mr. Anderson.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

And here comes the blame game...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I have the feeling that this trend of packagers throwing upstreamers under the bus is not going to end well.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Distro wars and that certain je-ne-sais-quoi toxicity of many uber-nerd environments, where elitism and holier-than-thou reign supreme.

I'm glad that a certain degree of pragmatism (e.g. W10's October deadline) is finally being embraced in our beloved ecosystem.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Relative numbers are all fine and dandy.

But it's in the absolute values I find most satisfaction.

The growth from 0.75% (2018) to 2.57% (2025) should be considered also compounded with the growth from 90M MAU (2018) to 150M (2024 - can't find data for 2025).

Graphing the absolute numbers would show an even steeper growth curve.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

@sudoers

The fun part is that they learned their lesson and didn't try that again

So you think this isn't just delayed on Canonical's part, but they will support 32bit forever?

Ok.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

@sundoer

Fun (!) part: Ubuntu already tried to get rid of this more than five years ago (19.10 and 20.04 LTS) and received the same flak.

https://ubuntu.com/blog/statement-on-32-bit-i386-packages-for-ubuntu-19-10-and-20-04-lts [External Link]

It's just a matter of time before all distros will go this way, hopefully coordinating a cutoff release point together.

We're just delaying the inevitable, until the point it will be really hard to manage the fallout.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I'm quite disappointed that he bailed out on this.

Honestly expected, given the negative press coverage and toxic, rabid comments from the "reee mu games" crowd, but nonetheless rather unimpressed about the outcome.

Instead of a strictly technical debate about the merits, the fallout consequences, and how to deal with them from a practical, actionable, "what can we do about it?" point of view, it turned out into a us-vs-them fistfight that helped nobody.

The issue remains, and of course will become worse every passing month, when more upstream drops support for legacy, and more people will expect support for obsolete, unmaintaned applications (for who commented about the kernel being 30 years old: UNMAINTAINED is the keyword here, and I don't think I need to explain why) which will become all the more burdensome the more time it passes.

Mark my words. This mess will rear its ugly head again, and more frequently every passing year.

A pyhrric victory for who cannot accept the hard fact that an early 2000 unmaintaned game belongs to a containerized or emulated environment, not to daily maintainer burden.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

@Caldathras & @ScottCarammell

Since the news of this being backtracked, I'd welcome you to continue the discussion in the new article's comment thread.

And never forget: we're all on the same side.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

@Caldathras

Besides, how do you know that this issue is not being influenced by IBM or RedHat in some way?

Because the engineer proposing the change says so in the very discussion thread this article is about?

https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f44-change-proposal-drop-i686-support-system-wide/156324/145 [External Link]

No offense, but on a matter about volunteer Fedora maintainers, I'd tend to trust more a volunteer Fedora maintainer than a Joe H Random on GamingOnLinux. And so should you.

Our society has been devaluing the idea of maintenance against the "convenience" of a throwaway habit that only benefits the for-profit sector -- at the expense of our society, culture and environment.

I feel the "right to repair" sentiment here, and I broadly agree with it.

But a line needs to be drawn.

If you're against the Temu's and the Shein's of this crazy world, I hear you. If you're against planned obsolescence which would require you to buy a new iPhone every time the old one's warranty expires, I hear you. If you're against mad races to shareholder quarterly profits at the expense of everything else, I hear you.

But the technology we're discussing to get rid of (again and again) is so old that calling it "throwaway habit" after more than twenty years that the "next model" has been out is frankly embarassing.

Just for scoping what we're talking about: can you provide a list of games that you know for a fact they wouldn't work on WOW64 Proton, or without i386 compat .so's, and the date they were published?

Just to have an idea of the size of the problem.

View this comment - View article - View full comments