Quoting: sprocket

Quoting: hell0

Quoting: sprocket#2 on the other hand, I've never really considered it much, but I don't know if it's a strong enough problem. And if the lawsuit wins on this ground, it will cause all sorts of headaches for developers who publish their games on multiple platforms. This isn't the CD-ROM era anymore, after all.

Just realised that it also happen to be flat out wrong: case [External Link] in [External Link] point [External Link].

These provide Steam codes, which still requires you having bought the game on Steam in the first place. You won't be able to use these DLC codes if you bought these games on GOG or Epic.

You are indeed correct, but in my opinion having to use the code through steam is quite different to what they claim (which is that you have to purchase the dlc directly from steam).

A world in which one could transfer their games from one store to another or cross-install DLCs would be pretty great. I doubt it will happen on its own or any time soon though.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: sprocket#2 on the other hand, I've never really considered it much, but I don't know if it's a strong enough problem. And if the lawsuit wins on this ground, it will cause all sorts of headaches for developers who publish their games on multiple platforms. This isn't the CD-ROM era anymore, after all.

Just realised that it also happen to be flat out wrong: case [External Link] in [External Link] point [External Link].

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: eldakingWell, about point 1 it is what Liam said, people often misunderstand what it means (it is for steam keys, not for the same game in a different store), and while people might choose to price similarly to avoid retaliations it is not something Steam has ever said, and there is no evidence of it.

Even if you only consider steam keys, how is humble bundle still a thing? They shovel piles of heavily discounted steam keys through the door every month. Does bundling games together or having a sale make it ok? If so isn't the point moot, since a competitor could just run sales and bundles endlessly?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Be warned that the demo does not save your progress. Particularly irritating as some prompts get stuck on screen and would require a restart to clear.

Game does look fairly interesting for what little I tried though.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Liam Dawe

Quoting: ToricJust recently finished it, and yah, the EA launcher canceled game night on more than one occasion.

I have someone desperate to play it with me, and I kept on saying no for that reason. Now I guess I have no excuse heh.

It's honestly a pretty fun and well put together game. A mix of platforming and puzzles, with real asymmetric coop (as in you have to cooperate to progress and it's not just both pressing identical buttons on either side of a fence). The story isn't too bad either, albeit a bit cliché. Worth a play!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: whizse

Quoting: LachuI remember about Alky: Exe file recompiler to native Linux binaries. Alky been illegal after court process.

This Alky [External Link]?

There's no word of of any court process or lawsuit in the (very candid) post-mortem and links to the source code.

Thanks, a quick search turned up nothing of note and I was wondering what Lachu was talking about. Usually when things ends up in court there is a bit more noise.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Tell stories through conversations: Every real-language conversation is generated based on your human’s unique situation. You can even craft your own conversations in-game.

Big claims right there. I can only imagine it being based on either premade logic blocks or LLM, neither of which would produce enjoyable results in my opinion.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: triphora

Quoting: hell0It's a shame 7 (ish, inferring from the blog post) people got fired as a result of this. Hope they've been given sufficient time to find a backup plan.

You can send a private message to me if you want more information on that. Let's just say it was substandard.

Quoting: hell0Also, does anyone know how the "get 1200k, return 800k" part works? Sounds like investors just wrote off 400k out of good will.

The remaining 400k is now a special form of non-voting equity in the company. It is effectively worthless unless the company decides to go public, in which case it will be converted into voting shares.

Thank you for the clarifications. The whole situation sounded a bit more murky than "let's not be rabid capitalists, rejoice!", and it indeed is.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Crasben

Quoting: hell0Also, does anyone know how the "get 1200k, return 800k" part works? Sounds like investors just wrote off 400k out of good will.

It says in the comment from the founder of Modrinth that they've returned $800k in remaining investor capital. So they already had returned the 400k before the return of 800k

I read remaining as "what's left after we used the money during a year", but you might be right and it would make more sense.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

It's a shame 7 (ish, inferring from the blog post) people got fired as a result of this. Hope they've been given sufficient time to find a backup plan.

Also, does anyone know how the "get 1200k, return 800k" part works? Sounds like investors just wrote off 400k out of good will.

View this comment - View article - View full comments