Quoting: Nevertheless

Quoting: deathxxxIf Valve move to FreeBSD, that will be great! Because BSD is more faster than Linux. Only AMD cards will have no binary drivers, so will force to use Mesa. For Nvidia is OK. PlayStation uses BSD already and we saw how it run.

Oh yes of course! Valve scraps everything they did for Linux (and community) and goes for BSD, turning to the vivid BSD gaming community for support, hoping for engine vendors, hardware vendors, middleware vendors, game developers to support their brand of BSD .. or doing it all themselves, because Canonical stops delivering Linux 32bit libs? I don't think so.

Quoting: TemplateRI personally think, that Valve should create a Linux-Distribution, which is NOT based on Debian or Arch. It would be much better to have more controls, hat should remain and what not.

BUT Valve should also recreate a new desktop environment, which aims more for PC instead of Console.

Quoting: mphuZValve is wrong about this.

It was high time for all software developers to stop supporting 32-bit. Valve should be able to fully switch to 64-bit faster.

This also applies to Wine. Stopping Wine64 support, and then crying and calling everyone bad - it`s brilliant. :huh:

The mess and stupidity of some developers amazes me every day. And Valve joined this as well. Valve still can not decide on the distribution. They were doing well with Debian / SteamOS, and then abandoned his support.

Quoting: ThormackIf it happens, I hope they choose Debian as the new default supported distro.

Not really a fan of the RedHat distros.

Quoting: liamdawe

Quoting: dpanterAfterparty went EGS? Aw motherfxx¤%!&"&% hell naw! *WHY* :><:

Yeah and it's another that hasn't said a word on the Steam page.

Quoting: Eike

Since Stadia will work on Linux and it's powered by Linux, here's what is newly announced for it:
[...]
Uplay+ - an extra subscription service, with access to 100+ games.

This does mean the games do not need to run natively on Linux.
Ubisoft won't port 100+ games...