Quoting: GuestWow, Is the Deck just 40% AdobeRGB?

or maybe they are saying to it as marketing material.
the last thing i heard was that deck was ~70% sRGB, not sure how it compare to adobeRGB or wich one is the most correct one, but if the content was designed for the wrong displays anyway, using an color accurate display will improve our experiences... at what cost?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

i rather have 800p OLED instead

View this comment - View article - View full comments

that sound like an stupid decision, but at least they can better debug or Q/A it with everybody running in the same settings.
if they are trying to write an more optimized code specifically for the deck, having people changing settings all the time may make it harder to know if the code you written harmed the performance in this scenario (number of enemies on screen, that part of the map, that angle, etc) or the slow down was due to something else.
later on they an add back more options for people who want to make some tradeoffs or fine tune it even more to try to squeeze more performance.

if the game was in "early access" or anything like that, i think the reception of this move wouldnt be so bad...
but being realistic here: they probably wont optimize their code and probably received an bag of cash from MS for doing stuff like that...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: PenglingA fellow GOL'er showed me this a couple of days ago: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/save-dollardollardollar-on-the-rog-ally-by-resetting-and-trading-in-your-steam-deck-gaming-handheld/ar-AA1b4Wka [External Link]

How convenient! :wink:

LOL half of me is worried that this marketing stunt can be effective, the other half cant stop laughing at how desperate microsoft is!
actually... i think im more into the laughing side.

"The Steam Deck is still quite popular and so a used Steam Deck 512GB SSD in good condition can be sold for $500 to $600 on average. Meanwhile, a 256GB Steam Deck in good condition tends to go for $400 to $450, and the 64GB Steam Deck is typically worth $350 to $400 if in good condition."
LOL they are implying you can sell it for almost as much money as you spend on a new one direct from valve!
if they truly believe that, then we can assume they are admiting that the value perception of the deck wasnt affected by the announcement of their own product.

and will be able to play Steam games as well as games on Nvidia GeForce Now, Game Pass, and more.

thos *** holes are still implying you cant use GFN on a steam deck.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Guestparticularly in the medical field.

medical? what a bunch of a** holes

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: GuestNow with this lawsuit now - I don't see any connection. MS again releases games on Steam, MS does not have any Deck competitor, nor mobile gaming device. It is in the interest in MS that the Deck is a success as it means MS can sell more games to potential customers.

I think the time is over to think of MS as the pure evil in a company form.

then i think you should watch the rog ally presentation.
not only they have an device to compete with the deck (an partnership with the vendors of one) but they spread FUD and miss information there.

i mean, they implied you cant do your homework on steamOS... (they said you can do it on the ally because its running windows)
implied you cant use xcloud (despite the fact that they thenselves officially support it)
implied you cant use netflix.
implied that windows is more compatible (when we know its the opposite, games that are compatible with it not the other way arround)

not to mention: MS interest is keeping their OS monopoly as well as sell stuff in their own store, having to support linux on their store, and support games purchased there runing on linux is out of their plans.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

i know that will sound like conspiration theory, but.. who else thinks microsoft is behind this?
that seems like an familiar situation, microsoft funding someone else to sue...

https://youtu.be/u4kMUk7sCUs?t=709 [External Link]

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Pengling

Quoting: elmapulfor a moment i thought it was an bundle like: purchase an steamdeck+this game for just <small price>.
for example my nintendo64 came with mario, a few came with banjo kazooie or stuff like that, those often came with special box art, colors and stuff like that.

For some reason, I can suddenly picture a Steam Deck Bomberman pack, containing Deck, Dock, game, and some extra controllers for multiplayer matches. :grin:

what i want the most is for companies like sega, nintendo and sony to relase their own take on this.

imagine if nintendo/sony get another bad generation where they cant get support from thirdy parts or sell well their console and decide to launch an linux based console instead? i doubt they would make it as open as steamdeck where you can install games from other stores or emulators, but at least that would help to reduce the cost of multi OS game development.

it may sound impossible, but we already had some consoles from nintendo (nes mini, snes mini, the new game n watch), from sony (playstation classics) from sega (game gear micro) and even atari!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

for a moment i thought it was an bundle like: purchase an steamdeck+this game for just <small price>.
for example my nintendo64 came with mario, a few came with banjo kazooie or stuff like that, those often came with special box art, colors and stuff like that.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: RedWare64And considering Microsoft's track record, they are bad at taking advantage of their IPs and acquired studio

cough cough rare cough cough.
seriously, Killer Instinct was good from what i heard, but it was not developed by rare, they purchased an studio and outsource the development of on of its ips, because they couldnt manage it thenselves.

Rarereplay is a good deal, but its just an reminder of what types of games rare will not produce anymore, what is the point of paying gor an game if you know the company wont produce more of the same ? making stake holders happy?
the whole purpose of paying for something instead of pirating it is to make sure the company will make more products like those.

the only thing microsoft seems to be good at is using the IP name as an free marketing for something, selling due to the branding instead of content.

sea of thieves may prove me wrong, proving that Rare is still capable of doing new ideas instead of relying on the brands from the past.
but i doubt they wouldnt be doing even more if they were still indies or nintendo partners.

hell, when doublefine was talking about the new psychonauts, they said that they were able to improve the game thanks to the microsoft funding, guess what improvment was quoted? graphics.

sigh, seriously if he said: "we have many new gameplay mechanics that were too troublemsome to implement, test, polish to make sure they are fun to play, but thanks to microsoft we were able to do it!" then i would be excited.
but no, microsoft creativity can be sumed up as: pretty graphics.

View this comment - View article - View full comments