Yay, Hamish is back. Interesting read, thanks.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

The touchbar on the Macbook is terrible and this one must be terrible as well.

Apple removed it from latest hardware and they admit to mistakes… never.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

It's Kudu or Kudo?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Is it that time of the year again? I didn't even notice... ;-)

A Merry Christmas to all.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

That is very pricey! I will stick on my wish list, native Linux has value.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Well, it's only natural Ubi will want to gauge interest in their own community instead of some other like Steam or, even more randomly, current Linux users. They want to know what their existing userbase thinks of this.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

GOG’s no-DRM policy is nice, but it has nothing to do with Linux or open source.

They started out as an old games store and no-DRM was them trying to stand out and was fitting for their catalogue where publishers wouldn’t be adamant about protecting their investments.

The lines are all blurred now with new games on GOG and old games on Steam and Steam is winning.

But I bet Steam isn’t winning because it has first-class Linux support. In fact, the only reason they do so much for Linux is because they can afford it and someone decided Windows’ monopoly needs to be broken and that is the real reason Valve deserves our (Linux users’) support. For now.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Valve isn't publicly traded as far as I can tell, so they don't have to chase profits and forecasts at any cost like a lot of the "evil" companies do. That's not to say they won't become evil at some point, people in power and business practices change.

A monopoly is _never_ good, so it's always worth it to have some competition to turn to. Their dominance/monopoly in the Linux space is unfortunately insignificant, though I find it very hard these days to give money to GOG what with their Linux support being the afterthought that it is.

In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if they dropped Linux support entirely now they're "restructuring".

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Nice, that’s my slightly broken entertainment sorted for today.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: PhiladelphusHence why eletrical sockets the world over have mechanisms to ensure that you can only plug a device in the correct way, rather than backwards which might fry your device or start a fire*. It sounds like you can still "plug things in backwards" with APT if you really want to, it's just removed the label on the plug telling you that's possible, which should stop a lot of people who otherwise wouldn't think to do it.

*And yes I know North American sockets can technically allow plugs to be flipped either way (because for some devices it doesn't matter), but that's both an exception to the rest of the world, and if the device really should be plugged in only one way there are two different physical mechanisms to enforce that. (Making one prong slightly larger, and using the third grounding prong.)

This is actually wrong. The UK has those huge sockets that can only work one way for electrical reaons (as far as I can tell), but other countries really don't. The US situation you describe is the norm, not the exception. This is alternating current, it'll work both ways because the current changes direction multiple times per second.

In Poland we have these grounded sockets/plugs that actually can be plugged in one way because there's a ground rod in the socket, though that is a limitation of the physical, not electrical, design. In neighbouring European countries they use almost the same plug but without the third rod and with two contacts on opposing sides of the plug and these can be put in every which way.

As for the topic at hand: this change should not have been made. LTT only cares about clicks and advertising revenue and they will do/show anything that will bring those in.

Linux and apt have been fine before they came along and breaking one's system is part of the learning experience and now there will be people who will be denied that.

This is clearly bad PR for Linux, it's enough to read the comments under the video a bit, but ultimately PR is PR. It's not like you can't break Windows by deleting system files. Also, he didn't break his system, he just broke the GUI and his problem was easily fixable by reinstalling the packages.

That said, the wall of text of apt is clearly deficient and should be improved.

View this comment - View article - View full comments