I don't really know why this game is popular. It felt very repetitive to me, despite the wildly different characters. Like the strategies are different ok, but the world and enemies themselves are just too repetitive and boring IMO.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: aufkrawallI could copy and paste my usual NV driver situation rant from another site here, but to keep it short: Way too sucky, hello Windows...

Boo

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: jarl.arntzenWhy not just call it "Couch OS".
Much more fun name which is actually perfectly related with the use case :D

That sounds like the OS is running on your couch. Smart couches anyone?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

If you liked Salt & Sanctuary, you should play this game. Also if you liked Axiom Verge or Hollow Knight.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

My babies have grown up and left the house :wub:

• VK_EXT_load_store_op_none


• VK_EXT_primitive_topology_list_restart

View this comment - View article - View full comments

> Defendants have caused and continue to cause irreparable harm

Hahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahaha hah hahahaha aaaaaah

....

Aaahahhahahahahahahahahahaha ahahhahaa hahahaha (snort) hahaha (snort) hahahahahahahahaha irreparable harm hahahahahahahahahahaha hahahah hahahahahahahahaha

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: CatKilleryou wouldn't let a child act like that, much less a professional software developer

If a child opens a lemonade stand and sells lemonade *with a cup* for 25 cents, then after you drank the whole lemonade, they regret it and ask for the cup back, will you ask for a full refund of your 25 cents? I sure hope your answer is no.

If a developer supports Linux, I buy and play the game to the end, with no intention of replaying it, then they remove Linux support, should they give a full refund? Do you see the analogy?

That's why I'm saying it's not so simple to define a rule that's fair. A developer pulling Linux support after they made sales is a dick move, but if your solution is to scare them from the start, they will simply chicken out and not do it in the first place. Funny you mentioned children, because that's exactly what I learned from my own child; you scare them to keep them safe and they become cowards.

In short, if you want more Linux support you need to encourage developers, not scare them, and some may very well fail after trying and that's normal.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: CatKiller

Quoting: ShabbyXAllow me to clarify, IIUC, kokokk's point is that even if the developer truly wants to support the platform and even if they honestly will try their best, forcing them like suggested may scare them so much they would decide not to take the risk.

They wouldn't be forced to support anything. They'd just have to give the money back if they lied about providing support when they don't, rather than just keeping it.

To put it another way: if you've written on your store page that you're going to support a platform, to entice customers on that platform to give you money, but you are unable or unwilling to provide that support, why should you get to keep the money?

I get your point, but your assumption is that any developer who drops Linux support has a malicious intent, and they were trying to cheat people out of their money right from the get go. That's where the disagreement really is. I don't believe for example the developer in this article intentionally thought "let me boost my sales by 1% through lies and deceit". They simply bit more than they could chew.

And regarding refund, I do wish there was a refund system for this, but it's not simple to be fair. For example, I had a lot of fun with Rocket League before they pulled the plug, is it justified that I get a full refund? I don't think so. Some cases are very clear to me though, if I bought the game and haven't played it yet, and support is dropped, then yes a full refund makes sense.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Guest

Quoting: CatKiller

Quoting: GuestRight, so let's put the following way:
Since most of developers are not so good (tm) at their job, not so much native titles will come in the future if you force them to unconditionally support Linux after launch.

Why the hell should anyone be giving them money for a game they won't support? Just because they lied about it to pretend that they would? Taking money under false pretences is fraud. Those are the people you want to buy games from?

I give up, probably there's a language barrier here.

Allow me to clarify, IIUC, kokokk's point is that even if the developer truly wants to support the platform and even if they honestly will try their best, forcing them like suggested may scare them so much they would decide not to take the risk.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: TheSHEEEPGame developers suck at software development, despite doing exactly that

Well the majority of "game developers" are actually just artists. One-man-army game devs are artists who can code a little.

Even a good majority of professional developers suck at programming (sorry, but that's the truth), can't really expect much from artists.

View this comment - View article - View full comments