Latest Comments by Tuxee
System76 patches APT for Pop!_OS to prevent users breaking their systems
10 Nov 2021 at 9:03 pm UTC Likes: 2
10 Nov 2021 at 9:03 pm UTC Likes: 2
Quoting: GuestMost likely not. But that's the point. AFAIK they agreed not to turn to third parties. We (at least a vocal portion of us) are constantly claiming how super-easy, barely an inconvenience it is to install a mainstream Linux distro. He just did what any Joe Average would do. Nothing else.Quoting: TuxeeHe could have asked Anthony, but being stubborn, didn't.Quoting: GuestThe fact this slipped through System 76's internal testing is absolutely inexcusable!What other options does he have as an "uninformed user"? You get the information that some packages are being removed. So? Then he would have to know what this packages are actually good for. And as already mentioned: He had no other option than to hit "y" if he wanted Steam.
Also, who actually ignores warning messages and proceeds regardless?
I get the impression Linus is not as clueless as he makes out and ultimately manipulated his viewers.
System76 patches APT for Pop!_OS to prevent users breaking their systems
10 Nov 2021 at 5:30 pm UTC Likes: 4
10 Nov 2021 at 5:30 pm UTC Likes: 4
Quoting: ageresBut then I realize it's about some guy from YouTube."Some guy" is putting it mildly. I'd say a lot more potential Linux users out there know Linus Sebastian but have never heard of Linus Torvalds before.
System76 patches APT for Pop!_OS to prevent users breaking their systems
10 Nov 2021 at 5:26 pm UTC Likes: 3
10 Nov 2021 at 5:26 pm UTC Likes: 3
Quoting: GuestThe fact this slipped through System 76's internal testing is absolutely inexcusable!What other options does he have as an "uninformed user"? You get the information that some packages are being removed. So? Then he would have to know what this packages are actually good for. And as already mentioned: He had no other option than to hit "y" if he wanted Steam.
Also, who actually ignores warning messages and proceeds regardless?
System76 patches APT for Pop!_OS to prevent users breaking their systems
10 Nov 2021 at 5:22 pm UTC Likes: 6
Seriously, this distro/DE/init system/display server bashing is just plain tiring. I have been working on Ubuntu since 8.04 and never (yes, never!) experienced any groundbreaking problems, yet I have never felt inclined to name-calling other distributions.
(BTW you should run Arch and mention it accordingly. Manjaro! How lame is that!)
10 Nov 2021 at 5:22 pm UTC Likes: 6
Quoting: kalinI tried popos and it was the same garbage as ubuntu. After some update the system got broken. From my experience manjaro is far better choice then anything Debian based. Turd is a turd no matter how much chocolate topping you put onGrow up. Will you?
Seriously, this distro/DE/init system/display server bashing is just plain tiring. I have been working on Ubuntu since 8.04 and never (yes, never!) experienced any groundbreaking problems, yet I have never felt inclined to name-calling other distributions.
(BTW you should run Arch and mention it accordingly. Manjaro! How lame is that!)
9 years ago Valve put out a Beta of Steam for Linux
6 Nov 2021 at 8:52 pm UTC
6 Nov 2021 at 8:52 pm UTC
Ah. Between 2008 (when I switched to Linux on my desktop) and 2013 I had plenty of time at hand. Well I had the Indie Bundle titles: Aquaria, World of Goo, Trine, Braid, Shank, Bastion, Limbo. Nice games, but I definitely didn't have to think about my pile of shame...
Get a look inside the Steam Deck in Valve's latest video
7 Oct 2021 at 8:42 am UTC
7 Oct 2021 at 8:42 am UTC
Quoting: whizse"ESD strap should make skin contact! Oops." :grin:Unless of course if these are antistatic/conductive gloves.
Help make the next Ubuntu version awesome with the final Ubuntu 21.10 Beta released
24 Sep 2021 at 10:28 pm UTC
24 Sep 2021 at 10:28 pm UTC
Quoting: Purple Library GuyAdblock can slaughter some webpages. (I have a PiHole running on my router and Google AdSense won't work (on any browser) before I turn it of.) On cbc.ca 28(!) resources are blocked by uBlock Origin. Turning of uBlock PiHole blocks some more requests AND the "Facebook Container" add-on.Quoting: TuxeeHuh. Maybe it has something to do with extensions, then. Perhaps I'm typically using an adblock on Firefox but not Chrome? I should do a bit of experimenting.Quoting: Purple Library GuyBut I've been forced more and more to switch to Chrome (or rather, at home at least, Chromium) because I hit more and more websites Firefox just doesn't manage to load, or can't show article comments, or stuff.Could you share some examples? Being a web developer I would be genuinely interested in such pages, because so far I haven't come across such websites (or rather these which showed quirks showed - different - quirks in Blink based browsers, too). And since I web development is my daily job, I'd say nowadays you have to put in some real effort to get something to work on Chrom(e|ium) but not on Firefox.
Examples that stand out in my mind are articles on the CBC website (that's Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Canada's BBC equivalent), where Chrome seems to show the conversation threads below but Firefox does not, and EBSCO, a major player in scholarly journal publication. I work in a university library and often have reasons to follow links to articles in our holdings. Chrome shows Ebsco articles no problem, Firefox shows a blank page. The problems seem to be the same on Windows at work and on Linux at home.
Help make the next Ubuntu version awesome with the final Ubuntu 21.10 Beta released
24 Sep 2021 at 6:23 pm UTC Likes: 1
24 Sep 2021 at 6:23 pm UTC Likes: 1
Quoting: Purple Library GuyBut I've been forced more and more to switch to Chrome (or rather, at home at least, Chromium) because I hit more and more websites Firefox just doesn't manage to load, or can't show article comments, or stuff.Could you share some examples? Being a web developer I would be genuinely interested in such pages, because so far I haven't come across such websites (or rather these which showed quirks showed - different - quirks in Blink based browsers, too). And since I web development is my daily job, I'd say nowadays you have to put in some real effort to get something to work on Chrom(e|ium) but not on Firefox.
Help make the next Ubuntu version awesome with the final Ubuntu 21.10 Beta released
24 Sep 2021 at 3:25 pm UTC Likes: 2
If you want to check the rest of the code:
https://github.com/snapcore [External Link]
Edit: Naturally you can bundle proprietary software as snaps - which is probably their prime use case.
Edit 2: It seems as if Mozilla preferred the packaging as snap.
24 Sep 2021 at 3:25 pm UTC Likes: 2
Quoting: Guesti heard snaps are propreitary. is that true?No. They are not. The Snap Store is not Open Source.
If you want to check the rest of the code:
https://github.com/snapcore [External Link]
Edit: Naturally you can bundle proprietary software as snaps - which is probably their prime use case.
Edit 2: It seems as if Mozilla preferred the packaging as snap.
Help make the next Ubuntu version awesome with the final Ubuntu 21.10 Beta released
24 Sep 2021 at 10:02 am UTC Likes: 1
As far as "resource hunger" goes: Both memory footprint and mass storage usage hardly make a difference (if packaged properly).
PHPStorm will eat up <500MB as (compressed) snap package and 1.4GB as (uncompressed) binaries.
24 Sep 2021 at 10:02 am UTC Likes: 1
Quoting: GuestUbuntu will get a lot of hate for the switch to snap for Firefox even though this is driven by Mozilla and a lot of the arguments used against it just aren't true anymore. Frankly I think it this move makes perfect sense and I would wager that the vast majority of users won't even notice the changeI'd say the major problem I encountered are slow first starts of applications. BUT: this seems more an issue of the packaged application and not Snap per se. Blender as snap starts pretty much instantly. Chrome was once utterly atrocious, now I have a two or three seconds overhead. The Zoom client is about the same. Jetbrains IDEs went from "quite acceptable" to total garbage (we are talking about 1 minute or more startup time on an SSD system - starting it from their own launcher takes a mere seconds). Subsequent starts were/are always fast.
As far as "resource hunger" goes: Both memory footprint and mass storage usage hardly make a difference (if packaged properly).
PHPStorm will eat up <500MB as (compressed) snap package and 1.4GB as (uncompressed) binaries.