Quoting: NyamiouMy guess is on No Man's Sky. It's definitely a massive game, on every sense of the word.

Ugh, not that game. They may port if they want to torture us.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Redface

Quoting: t3g

Quoting: STiATI doubt that any game supporting Vulkan will come out any time soon, since drivers of the Ubuntu LTS are not up for it (NVidia 304.131)

The 367 drivers (stable Vulkan support) will make their way into the Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.10 repos soon and will replace 361 according to this xenial-proposed entry [External Link] on Launchpad.

I'm also guessing they will be available to install either before or when Ubuntu 16.04.2 gets released as an ISO at the end of this year or in February 2017.

That sounds good, and the current 16.04 LTS has 361.42 so its not as old as STiAT wrote who still must be on 14.04

Yeah, I filed this bug [External Link] back in March to replace 361 due to issues and to do 364 instead. Now that we have 367, that is the preferred stable release.

EDIT: Nothing is stopping STiAT from getting newer drivers from https://launchpad.net/~graphics-drivers/+archive/ubuntu/ppa [External Link]

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: STiATI doubt that any game supporting Vulkan will come out any time soon, since drivers of the Ubuntu LTS are not up for it (NVidia 304.131)

The 367 drivers (stable Vulkan support) will make their way into the Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.10 repos soon and will replace 361 according to this xenial-proposed entry [External Link] on Launchpad.

I'm also guessing they will be available to install either before or when Ubuntu 16.04.2 gets released as an ISO at the end of this year or in February 2017.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Its probably a Deus Ex game, but I would love love love if it was the new DOOM. :D

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I hope this developer realizes that Epic is going to take his code, lock it down, not give it back to the community (it's not GPL), and then make millions of dollars from publishers while he gets $0 and has to resort to the good will of a "community" to fund his efforts to help Epic keep their code proprietary.

If the code was going to remain open for everyone to use, then his efforts aren't wasted as others can learn from it and use that knowledge for their own games. But since he insists on contributing to the existence of non-free software free of charge, he's a fool.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

So Epic Games, a company that has made games for decades and makes a lot of money off of licensing their Unreal Engine is now panhandling for money? This isn't some indie dev looking to make ends meet. Its a big company that could spend the resources into GNU/Linux development if they wanted.

You want to support someone who needs it? How about that Axiom Verge guy and his sick kid instead. No way am I paying to support a corporation that takes advantage of the GNU/Linux community for free labor and doesn't release the code that the community worked on as free software.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Some beta impressions:

View video on youtube.com

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Who buys games on day one anyways? They are usually buggy, require multiple patches, and has content locked behind paid DLC and season passes. Plus, there are Steam and GOG sales in addition to G2A and Kinguin.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I know you want more support for GNU/Linux, but that doesn't mean you should suffer by playing games like this. No reason to white knight.

View video on youtube.com

View this comment - View article - View full comments

If you've seen Indie Game: The Movie, you know all about Phil.

View video on youtube.com

View this comment - View article - View full comments