Quoting: EagleDelta…there is absolutely no fair solution here.

The solution there would be to not promise what you can not or, even worse, do not intend to fulfill. Or to stick to your promise till the (bitter?) end. Or to refund all those who you let down in hopes they will still pick your game during a sale (for 50% or less) when it finally arrives. That would be more honest, don't you think? But a business venture has no concept of "honesty", "morals" or "fairness". Money is money, after all.

Quoting: EagleDeltaAs for your money no being "no worse" than Windows users' money. Objectively that is true. Money is money.... when taken at individual customer value, but businesses (even indie ones) don't have that luxury. A single customer's payment doesn't pay the bills or make them profitable. So, subjectively, from the Business' viewpoint, our money is worth less as our customer base provides less profit potential than the larger user base.

It is called Prisoner's dilemma [External Link]. From the Business' viewpoint it is more profitable to betray, like "Larian Studios" did (when they were on the brink of bankruptcy, they promised Linux just for the sake of extra cash). That way a developer can perform a simple money grab and get away with it (as there are no precedents proving otherwise). But it is true only for one-step game. As it is said "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me". But if things go right, there will be no need to return to Kickstarter.

Quoting: EagleDeltaSure, it probably works mostly fine on Ubuntu, but Zeboyd probably takes the same stance that some of the FOSS communities I'm in do:

"We don't support it on a system until we test it on that system."

And that's reasonable. But I highly doubt they will test the game on Gentoo, Debian, Fedora, SUSE, Arch, Antergos, Red Flag, ROSA, Manjaro and other distros. Ubuntu is all we will get, for better or for worse. And they only testing it now…

Quoting: EagleDeltaAnd testing on multiple versions of the same Operating System is a LOT easier then testing on multiple versions of multiple platforms AND Operating Systems.

True. But in our case they should add a single OS (distro) -- Ubuntu. And I highly doubt they tested their game on all of the Windows flavors. In fact, I suppose they are settled for what their version of Unity3D supports. Truth to be told, they are not true programmers. Hardly they even wrote more than a hundred lines of code. They are artists, composers, designers, scripters. They take the pre-made tool (video game kit such as Unity or XNA) and make a game on it. All their code are scripts for the Unity, not true application code. And I pray they did not pick any obnoxious plugins on the way as they are probably lack any expertise to fix them (if they are broken) or even access to the source code.

Quoting: EagleDeltaAlso, if there's one thing I've noticed from the outside looking in.... Game Development practices seem have significantly drifted away from how a lot of modern Software Development is performed. Outside of a few development studios, it seems most of game dev has NOT adopted modern software development practices such as Automated testing, Automated Deployments, Agile workflows (and deployments), etc. Meaning that game devs may not have the tools in place for fast and stable deployments/releases of their games to multiple platforms.

Gamedev nowadays is not the same as in 80's. Then a (often) single person had to not only compose the music, but to write his(her) sound driver as well, draw images and invent a way for DOS to actually display them. That were the days when various obscure sound and graphic formats were invented (like in case of Black Isle Studio: "Startrek Scripting Language" and ACM sound format used in Fallout -- internal developments). The game-programmers were elite of the elite (ever heard of "Sega Technical Institute" ), their names were secret (they used nicknames in game's titles). And they were few.
Nowadays everyone can download Unity3D, RPGMaker, "GameMaker: Studio", "Wintermute Engine" (or "Adventure Game Studio" ) and start creating. The programming skill fell trough the ground right into Earth's mantle, but the number of creative, innovative projects skyrocketed!

So, even if Zeboyd are programming laymen, they probably made a damn-good game (or so I hope)! Heard a lot of good stuff about their innovative storytelling, humor and superb game design.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: EagleDeltaI actually asked him about the Linux progress a few weeks ago on twitter. It seems like Zeboyd is a 1-2 man "studio"…

I know that.

Quoting: EagleDelta…I can't blame such a small team for deciding to release each platform independently of each other.

And I can as I'm a backer and my money is no worse than money of Windows users.

Quoting: EagleDeltaWe're the smallest potential customer base of all the platforms, so it's natural that we'd get work done last....

Natural for you -- maybe. But not for me. If you can not do the job properly, then don't attempt to do it! Come to think of it, they already offered 50% discount before the Linux version saw the light of the day. This means I could just wait for the sale instead of backing the project for nothing (so far, at least). This whole "small user base" argument is pure rationalization and you probably know it, just can not accept the pain of being "second-class citizen" and persuading yourself into thinking that all of this is normal.

Quoting: Alm888Also, I was pretty sure that they were using platform independent tools to build the game.

That "tool" is called Unity3D which replaced "Microsoft XNA" from their previous works (they explained this in one of Kickstarter updates). And we know Unity works (more or less ;) ). The recent tweet is a clear indicatior of that: the guy installed Ubuntu for the first time, launched his game and it worked right out of the box! So, apparently, Linux (and probably, MacOS) release was delayed for no objective reason (other than "we are just two guys and have a lot of things on our hands right now, our fingers are too hurt from all those paperwork signing for release on Steam").

Quoting: EagleDeltaThat means absolutely nothing. I develop Puppet Modules, some Rails apps, and Ruby libraries. I couldn't tell you how I would make anything I've worked on work in a Windows Environment..... does that mean my skills suck?

That does not make you an honor. I develop for Windows on Linux (Windows XP included! Because he who pays, chooses the music) and damn I be if I not test my program on several versions of Windows (GTK2 and dynamic loading are a pain, especially not the most recent builds).

Quoting: EagleDeltaThat's not how software development works and I this hostility that some of the vocal parts of our community throw indiscriminately at developers needs to stop until you can prove that you have experience working with such complex products and tooling. It's NEVER as simple as some make it out to be.

Demanding a proof of my expertise when you did not provide yours? That's bold! My advice: speak for yourself and stop preaching the community and judging its "misbehavior". You are in no better position as anyone else to dictate what everyone should feel, think or say!

But enough of that, our conversation starts to feel personal and I do not like it one bit!

With all of this said, I must clarify my position: I am not against Zeboyd or their projects. In fact, I'm very hyped to see the game (finally!) but the spoon is most precious at dinnertime. And we (will?) get our "spoon" when Windows users are washing dishes. I will watch for Zeboyd's future products, but no more money from me till the release day.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: razing32Hmm , did not hear of those games.
Are they not being ported because of said plugins ?

Through the Woods -- yes, the Linux version was available in the demo (IDK about official Kickstarter promise) but later the situation changed as it turned out the "Vital Technology Upon Which Relies the Entire Project"™ (no, it is not replaceable!!!) is Windows-only.

And as of Obsidian Entertainment (a true veterans without any sarcasm!) -- their "Pillars of Eternity" had the so-called "Shroud"™ plugin (AFAIK) to render capes and such. The plugin worked under Windows and was declared as working on Mac. Somehow Obsidian just assumed by the time of the release it will be available on Linux without even prooving Mac reliability. As it turned out, declared Mac support was total BS and developers of said plugin had no plans on fixing it (let alone add Linux support). The story ended with Obsidian just disabling cape visualization on Linux and MacOS as it was not feasible to replace the plugin that late in the development process (they found out the bad news just prior to release, when they tried to compile the game for Linux and MacOS for the first time).

So yeah! A developer testing declared Linux version after release… it tells something about their skills.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

So, they basically ran Kickstarter campaign several years ago, developed the entire game exclusively on Windows, not even checking Linux compatibility once, released the game and only after 3 months he (the "coder-guy" ) finally graces us with his first Linux install of the life.

They seem to be professionals of the highest caliber! "Promise now, deal with it later" at its best! Keep your fingers crossed that they didn't use some Windows-only plugins, like… you know… Obsidian (hello capes!) or Antagonist (Through the Woods [External Link].

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Wow!!! Thirteen pages already! The game is 2 years old and pretty much "water under the bridge" already, yet, the discussions are as heated as ever!

My personal opinion:
1) No Tux == No bucks;
2) Never pre-order;
3) eON, indirectX, toGL etc. ports are still wrappers no better than WINE, so at least they should perform better than WINE itself in order to not being useless garbage;
4) A company (literally any company, even big ones) releasing a port several years later should not sell it for full release price. Bargain bin is the place those ports should belong;
5) Small number of Linux users is no excuse to either outright lie about port quality or have "Eat what's been served, swine!" attitude. Every job must be done proper, if you can not do it, then don't do it;
6) People saying Linux users "should come off the high horse and start appreciate what we have", "get a slap of reality"; that "beggars could not be choosers" -- all those "advisers" should mind their own business and stop teaching others of what to do and what to think, thank you very much;
7) All mentioned above is no excuse for personal insults, death threats and such. Those are very grave crimes and should be dealt accordingly on a "case by case" basis. One person should not be held responsible for all society.

Thank you for your time. ^.^

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: liamdawe

To protect your privacy, external media requires approval to load.

Source: i.imgur.com

View cookie preferences.
Accept & Show Accept All & Don't show this again   Direct Link

^ That's a feature for a reason.

Sorry, my bad. It is a magic how "Internet-aware" people get accustomed to filtering certain things on certain places (like not paying attention to page sides, headers or in this case, "something between posts", because that's where advertisement usually is). This button simply blurred in my vision. :-( Will use it from now on.

Quoting: liamdaweAlso, there is British English and American English, so languages is correct.

Different dialects, maybe. But not languages. Besides, there are a lot more of those: "Australian English", "New Zealand English", "Scientific English", "Legal English", "Patent English" and, most important, "Internet English" which we all are using. :D

View this comment - View article - View full comments

"non-English languages"…
Like there are "English languages" (i.e. English somehow became a category)…
Sorry to be a "Grammar Nazi", but I think "languages, other than English" would be more appropriate.

Still no word on DRM-free release?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

So, it seems Gaben appreciated "Windows 10 S"! "Hedgehog is a proud bird: it won't fly if not kicked!"

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: ShmerlIs that real? Quite surprising indeed.

Well, they demonstrated the blow absorption at the beginning of the video…
From what I heard only jousting armor was so unwieldy that knights could not saddle a horse in it without external support, actual combat armor were lighter. And on top of that while heavy indeed, it had rational weight distribution on the whole body so all those 35+ kg as armor is not the same thing as 35+ kg in the hand or as backpack.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: ShmerlConsider some characters making rolls and other acrobatic moves in heavy plate armor(!).

Not that far from reality: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hlIUrd7d1Q [External Link]

View this comment - View article - View full comments