Do you know if there is a "creative" mode, where we can set the room shape and size, and try combinations of furnitures to see how it results?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

clearly, specially for gaming, 1280 x 720 should be the target to get the FPS and save the battery. Clearly enough at that size!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Apex is a very good game, in term of gameplay.
Lost in Random is quite a nice game also.

Just for Apex, I hope for a better consideration of linux users by this company.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Halls of torment, my best discovering this year thanks to GOL <3

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I miss some good shoot-them-up like stargunner or entertaining like Apidaya.

The Sky force [External Link]'s game are a nice go for shmup on linux and steam deck, and playing in coop locally with children or friends. I warmly recommend.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: MicHaeL_MonStaRFunny how 'Mirror's Edge' is "DRM-free", yet I have it on disc (for PC from the original release) and could not activate its code due to servers being down. I had to resort to digitizing my copy through Origin (which actually did recognize the years-old code) some time ago.

So much for the whole "physical is ownership" thing, huh... Cool that it's on GOG, though.

Same experiences with many games on my side with Diablo I & II, Unreal, AVP, Dungeon keeper II, etc.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

From 5.8.0, users will instead be directed to choose a game when first starting Minetest. Minetest Game will still be available to download, but the user will see other games as well. This gives greater visibility to the wide range Minetest has to offer.

To protect your privacy, external media requires approval to load.

Source: blog.minetest.net

View cookie preferences.
Accept & Show Accept All & Don't show this again   Direct Link

What new players will see when they open up Minetest.

That's a super good idea! Thanks for that smart move. I had trouble to explain each time to new people, and specially young ones, how it works. Now that's explicit.
Thank you for your incredible work and for listening the community, especially the new comers.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Streets of Rogue is only classified "steam deck playable"?
In my mind, it would be the best way to play it, on the steam deck (that I don't have), even if it is really fun to play with friends and relative on the same PC

shadow warrior 2 is so much fun, is it fun to play on the deck?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Paradox, the DLC runner... One finished game costs ~150€, and will be barely finished for this amount.

4x is hard to dosage.
Odd world tried: too messy, too complex for too few rewards, AI has no flaw even in the lower difficulty, after the initial "wow" of the things to manage, you are left with a felling of "all that for that?!"

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: EhvisThis clearly demonstrates that the idea of client side anti-cheat is a problem. It is used as a replacement for proper server side checking because it's a cheap solution. EAC only seems to catch the low hanging fruit with a bunch of false positives to go with it (not just the Linux players).

Yes, the server anti-cheat would be a plus, and I hope they already have (for instance, checking for a max speed won't be of some difficulties as they had a reward for making some distance per game for octane, and identifying speed hack thus should be possible).

But paying ~5 guys worldwide (for sure in cheap country with decent computer competences and a good equipment, like india for asia area, Romania or marocco for europe & africa areas, etc.) not 24/24 on each area and considering that you clearly have peaks in the evening in each area, and considering that the dissuasion (especially if a bit random over time) won't be that expensive, and that EA will anyway have to pay people to treat complaining on forum/assistance and on the social networks in terms of communication.
Remember we are talking about a company declaring his income on Apex to be $160 to 180 million $ per year (even if complaining that the increase was not as much as they expected last year, but in a finite world, increasing the expected income from a game as a limit also! and doesn't decrease the net income from this game....I bet most companies would love to still have that yearly net income on a finished game, marginally developed, for 13 years!). And remember that EA makes 7.500 billion $ per year while Apex is one of their top-3 horsepower games and one of their showcase product.

So no paying real human behind the screen is just a short term choice for greedy (as concerning a really small percentage of the income) and ideological goals intended to satisfy the shareholders, rather than intended to the quality of the product and to satisfy and retain the consumers.

View this comment - View article - View full comments