Quoting: stankalovichWow these updates with the on disk shader cache make 17.1 look like the release that will make AAA titles run decently.Hopefully they can squeeze AMD OpenGL 4.5 into it as well.

It is already in 17.0.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: monsieursauceDoes a reverse crowdfunding exist for Linux? The potential buyers "virtually" pay for the product until there is a project holder willing to handle the port, because of the game's popularity?

Never heard of it, though I proposed it to few people in the past. It's an obvious way to measure demand.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Pre-ordering doesn't make sense to begin with. Why would you pay for something before it's ready? That's why I never view crowdfunding as pre-ordering, but as investment. When you enable its creation, that's something I can support. Pre-ordering on the other hand - I see no point in.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: iskaputt

Quoting: Shmerl... I'm willing to take some more risk as a Linux user than usual, just to demonstrate said demand.

But there lies a problem, you *cannot* demonstrate Linux demand. Not until there is some "Linux or money back" checkbox when you pledge.

You can, when developers ask for it, and you comment to them about your Linux interests. For example, developers of Underworld Ascendant collected that info, and based on feedback announced Linux support.

And, as a Linux backer, no one stops you from commenting. Developers are paying attention.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I agree with those who said above, that crowdfunding from the backers' perspective involves estimating the risk. But to add to that, crowdfunding also is often used by developers for estimating the demand. From that perspective, I'm willing to take some more risk as a Linux user than usual, just to demonstrate said demand. But surely, it's much easier to back developers with proven record of high quality Linux games, than total newcomers without any history.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

It's not really about XFS specifically. It's about developers not releasing 64-bit builds, and not making 32-bit ones properly either (they need to enable LFS, and they don't).

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_file_support [External Link]

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: oldrocker99It had never occurred to me; I posted a whining request!

I answered you there :)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: renegat0x0I understand when high-end games use their own engines (for example witcher 3). Triple A game requirements are high. If game engine was not optimized for the game, the performance would be poor. However there is no need for control for simple games, or games that use simple mechanics. Even though I have not played the witness I suspect there is nothing it that cannot be realized using an existing engine. I find no necessity for control here. That is why I find the witness author complaints completely missed.

There can be multiple reasons to make your own engine. Educational for instance. Making your own engine helps getting experience in graphics programming. If you just use others' engines, you don't really learn it in depth.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

They answered the question about cloaks though:

@Feargus: By the way, will cloaks work on Linux this time around?

Feargus [developer]
I'm going to go out on a limb and say yes, because I am pretty sure we've gone with a completely different system.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Backed at Premium Digital. But so far my question about whether they plan to release it in 64-bit on Linux wasn't answered. Tyranny still wasn't fixed [External Link] for Large File Support after all this time and still doesn't work on XFS.

View this comment - View article - View full comments