For those who compared Steam client with browsers - you are wrong. Is Steam client open source? Even if it doesn't need to connect to the server to reinstall a backup (which I doubt, it most probably does need to connect to the server), where can you get that client if Steam goes bust? It's closed and proprietary. So if Steam closes down you lose the service and the client. So comparison with the browser goes out of the window.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Quote from AoC"I think you sell arms or you don't. If you sell them inevitable they will end up in the hands of those with the cash to buy them." -Sir Humphrey.

If you want games on Linux you will have DRM on Linux since it's entrenched in the industry... "I for one am grateful." - Rabbit-Tooth Jane

It's not as bad as with video. DRM free games are increasing in number, so if you want games on Linux, you don't need DRMed games. It's not "entrenched in the industry". Its entrenched in distributors who are conductive for its usage. But this was indeed already discussed at length.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Half-Shot: As I said. Valve can offer something... DRM-free for a change ;)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I'd expect that Debian developers are pretty negative about DRM in general, so this move from Valve is rather weird.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Steam backup ability doesn't work for installation without Steam. And I'm not sure about all games being self contained and not relying on installation scripts. But if you saw this documented somewhere, that's another matter.

About attitude - that was about not providing packages for download easily. Saying "go to the game directory, fish it out and let's hope it will work as is" is not a serious way to handle that. It's dismissive or unsupported in my book. That's the attitude I was talking about.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

fowll: And? Why would you rely on any of their promises? Promises don't substitute backups, and promises aren't part of your user agreement with Valve, so they can always say they have no obligations to keep them if they go bankrupt (they even might not have an ability to keep them at that point).

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Disharmonic: It might be true for some games (like with self contained directories) and might be not true for others (which have some installation scripts and etc.). Anyway, the lack of official support for such DRM free packages makes me consider Steam to be always DRMed (with ways to bypass it in cases when you can manually backup the game). It's the attitude that I consider bad the most, which is enough of a reason for me not to use Steam. In contrast, HB and GOG officially offer DRM-free packages and make an effort to support the usability of such approach.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Any DRM is DRM, far or not. If the service closes down, and let's say you own a few thousands worth of games there, is it far that you won't be able to install any of them because you didn't have an option to back them up when you bought them? I know quite a few people who avoid using Steam just for that reason. Any DRM is bad.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I wasn't talking about Steamworks lock-in, which developers can avoid if they wish. It's bad of course. I was talking about requiring to run the client and connecting to the service to install the game. It's step 1 DRM, and no, Steam offers no packages outside the service. Sometimes you can manually copy stuff and reuse, but that's not an official support when the service provides a package (like HB and GOG do). Therefore I consider Steam to be always DRMed.

To clarify, it's not about a burden of logging in anywhere. It's about an ability to install (from a backup for example) and run the game without the service.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Quote from liamdaweWell no, Steam is the most integral part of their entire service, they won't give that up, ever.

So they consider DRM to be the integral part of their service? I really don't see a good reason for that. Convenience of the service in some aspects has nothing to do with restrictions it also adds. I.e. nothing stops Steam from keeping the convenience while dropping the DRM nonsense. Except their unwillingness.

Quoting: Quote from fowllgood thing is that Valve already offer DRM free games. DRM is not a part of steam but a option for developers who require DRM.
try for example "sir, you are being hunted" by double clicking on the ELF file, with steam closed.
the game starts and steam stay closed.

No, they don't. I already explained in the previous threads, that DRM-free means offering standalone packages / installers first (and then of course no additional requirements to run the client for running the game and so on). Steam fails at step one already.

View this comment - View article - View full comments