I prefer real time + pause mechanic myself, but it's cool they are adding an option for turn based mode. I wish games with turn mode only did the same the other way.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I prefer VMs over containers for development. I played around with lxc containers, but it always felt much easier to set up a user session qemu/kvm + libvirt VM (in something like virt-manager) than jump through the hoops of setting a non privileged lxc container and all permissions for it. lxc seems to be better prepared for privileged use cases. Or may be I just need more experimenting with it.

I'm not really sold on immutable distros for normal desktop use cases anyway, I don't see a major benefit in losing flexibility for general purpose needs. So far the only case where I'm using one is with OpenWRT [External Link] for my router. Immutability makes sense there due to special installation requirements on the embedded devices. Customization with packages there is possible using overlayfs. It doesn't need to generate a new image, it keeps immutable components separate from installed packages.

If a kernel module you need is not there, you will need to create a "custom image" that bundles the kernel module you need.

Which sort of starts defeating the purpose of using such approach. It's easier to build just a module than to build a whole new image to use a single module.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Very nice! Now I can remove all 32-bit packages from my Debian installation.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Of which the vast majority of normal users won't even notice.

That depends on what you call normal. Can you for example configure kernel modules there or immutability prevents that? Can you run stuff like VMs? "Normal" is too loose to describe it. I'd always see immutable distro as limiting and not general purpose enough.

If it covers your use cases - then it's useful. It is most fitting for console set ups in the gaming context.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Bazzite is far more newbie friendly than Arch/CachyOS, and can be used for pretty much everything besides gaming

I don't think so. Immutable distro puts a lot of restrictions on its use cases, so I wouldn't consider it pretty much for everything purpose. "User friendly" is a double edged if you simply can't do what you need.

More like "super restricted so you can't easily break things" - yeah. But that doesn't mean it suits all needs.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

a case against Linux Mint.

Not so much Mint, as the LTS (more exactly long term fixed release) model you mention. I see it as a bad fit for gaming in general, yes. Mint just has additional issues due to its DE not having timely Wayland support as I mentioned above, which I think is more important for gaming than it might appear.

So yes, I recommend rolling distros for gaming as having better overall benefits than fixed releases distros. Plus the distro should have modern and sufficient Wayland support.

We are talking about recommendations anyway. No one stops anyone from using any distro they want.

Nobara, Bazzite, CachyOS and other. You should be wondering why Linux gamers use these distros instead of Debian Testing/Unstable...

Hype. Same reason many used Ubuntu vs Debian in the first place. I don't personally see a point in hype distros. If you want more rolling than Debian rolling flavors, regular Arch will do. CachyOS is especially problematic to recommend to newcomers due to them having a tendency to use all kind of non upstream and experimental / unreleased stuff out of the box. It results in such newcomers being unable to report bugs upstream and a ton of related confusion.

Bazzite is a special case, as I mentioned above, it's not really in the same category as the rest since it's an immutable distro. It's more suitable as an alternative to something like SteamOS for console like set ups.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Personally I recommend new users to start with Debian (rolling flavor) right away.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

this can happen if you've got very recent hardware.

Or simply recent enough, say latest generation of AMD GPUs that have minimum requirements that distros like Mint often don't supply by default. My point is that I find it a bit counter productive to recommend such distros for newcomers from Windows, since it results in them having problems.

On the other side of it, the trade off of rolling distros is the need to learn more stuff, but I think such trade off is worth it and that's not time wasted.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

From what I gathered Bazzite is a very specific distro, it's not general purpose. So I'm not surprised it's more niche than general purpose Arch.

Not everyone uses computers only for gaming, I'd imagine majority actually uses them for everything, and gaming is just one use case among many.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Mint user here. I think that's because for gaming, Mint is a great compromise. Debian's ultimate focus is stability, which makes it a fantastic choice for servers, but in gaming, you often want components that aren't quite that old. It still doesn't randomly break your stuff, unlike rolling release distros

That's why I said Debian testing / unstable, not Debian stable. Such kind of approach (whether in Mint or Debian stable itself) can cause problems too unless people understand its limitations.

I periodically see a bunch of people complaining that their hardware doesn't work, which ends up being them using Mint which doesn't ship recent kernel and Mesa.

Rolling flavors of Debian are a better fit in my opinion.

Also, I think KDE is a better fit for modern gaming features, due to Cinnamon being way slower in supporting Wayland. Having focus on its own DE and not keeping up with the times is a downside for Mint. Even Ubuntu stopped its own DE efforts for that reason.

irc every more or less official Debian related place tells you not to use those unless you really know what you're doing

You should know what you are doing no matter what you are using. That's my experience. I'd say Debian testing/unstable isn't any worse than a bunch of other rolling distros, like Arch or what not. If anything, it's more stable than Arch. Those who say not to use it are doing a disservice.

View this comment - View article - View full comments