We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.
It seems Feral Interactive are continuing to help development of the Vulkan 'radv' AMD driver in Mesa, as they have pushed another patch.

This isn't the first patch from Feral, it's not the first from this particular developer either! I'm sure it won't be the last as well.

From the patch, which is already in Mesa-git:
QuoteIf we have any pending flushes on the primary command buffer, these must be performed before executing the secondary buffer.

This fixes potential corruption when the contents of a subpass which clears any of its render targets are given in a secondary buffer: the flushes after a fast clear would not have been performed until the vkCmdEndRenderPass call.


Good stuff from Feral there, pleasing to see them not just bring games to Linux, but actively help towards driver development too.

We know Feral have a Vulkan game planned for this year, as they already said so. This is likely work towards enabling them to support their Vulkan-powered games on the open source drivers. Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
14 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. Find me on Mastodon.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
49 comments
Page: «5/5
  Go to:

Leopard Mar 11, 2017
Quoting: t3gMesa has been updated with a lot of cool features lately, but its too bad distros like Ubuntu are always behind.

If you add Padoka Ppa,you will get latest stable Mesa.So that is not a problem.
TheRiddick Mar 11, 2017
Most people don't know to do that, which is why Linux gets such a bad rep, they come, try it out and notice its terrible and leave even thought the distro is rolling OLD broken mesa among other things in the repository. At least for AMD users, if NVIDIA users can get past the black screen and full composition issue then their fine.
tuubi Mar 11, 2017
View PC info
  • Supporter
Quoting: TheRiddickMost people don't know to do that, which is why Linux gets such a bad rep, they come, try it out and notice its terrible and leave even thought the distro is rolling OLD broken mesa among other things in the repository. At least for AMD users, if NVIDIA users can get past the black screen and full composition issue then their fine.
You mean adding a ppa is harder than trawling ihv sites for updated drivers? ;)

The users you are talking about will have difficulty managing any OS.
TheRiddick Mar 11, 2017
You assume they should know about PPA usage at the start, when its not mentioned anywhere upon installing most Ubuntu distro's. PPA could mean anything.


Last edited by TheRiddick on 11 March 2017 at 11:59 am UTC
tuubi Mar 11, 2017
View PC info
  • Supporter
Quoting: TheRiddickYou assume they should know about PPA usage at the start, when its not mentioned anywhere upon installing most Ubuntu distro's. PPA could mean anything.
I don't assume anything. New Windows users don't know anything about downloading and installing drivers either.
TheRiddick Mar 11, 2017
They don't need to, the distro comes with them.
dmantione Mar 11, 2017
Both downloading Windows drivers as well as adding PPA's is a bad thing for the user experience, both require that the user is computer literate. As far as I am concerned, and the fact that it is needed on Windows, should not mean that we can relax as Linux community. Drivers are unfortunately still one of the most prominent reasons why Linux is being held back for wider adoption, the more we can do to improve it the better. Distributions have done great things in this regards, but the balance between stability and new hardware support is a though one for distributions and there is a lot of work left.

Both the out-of-the-box experience, as the ease how slightly outdated systems can be updated, are areas of concern. PPA is not unacceptable, but a situation is preferred where it is not needed at all and distributions feed the right driver to users without them thinking about it. If security concerns are a reason to feed updates to users, why not hotfixes for the latest games/hardware?

Actually it concerns me a lot, especially because of RADV. We badly need Vulkan, but if RADV becomes necessary for a good gaming experience, there will be a long period where we need bleeding edge Mesa version on our systems, and unfortunately you then get the "compile your own kernel and Mesa" user experience of Linux. Not good to attract gamers.


Last edited by dmantione on 11 March 2017 at 12:20 pm UTC
TheRiddick Mar 11, 2017
Most videocards come with a driver disc or warning on the box to get latest drivers from a website. Now for NVIDIA that isn't so bad as they have Linux drivers out there for you to easily see and they ARE the latest, provided the user doesn't get blackscreen upon install (very common), and is able to figure out howto install them from bash (annoying for new users).

AMD's website will cause you to find the OLD fglrx drivers for Linux which will give you a rather frustrating experience to say the least.
eldersnake Mar 11, 2017
My limited experience with the PRO driver was anything but a smooth experience. The only game that slightly improved was Deus Ex. I quickly ran back to Mesa haha. I don't mind compiling the latest version though, I often check the Mesa git page for new features like a kid in a candy shop.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.