Quoting: Guest

Quoting: Xpander

Quoting: GuestWe beat nvidia fanboys with the RX 3080 at fraction of the GTX 1070Ti cost next year.

Also getting 1070Ti performance like 2 years later isnt something really to be proud of.

Closed source graphics drivers are cheating in rendering so that they look good in benchmarks. That isn't something really to be proud of.
Vega 64 is faster than 1070Ti
[graphics hierarchy](https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gpu-hierarchy,4388.html)

Not the right place to argue, but ofc Vega 64 is faster than 1070Ti, it costs 100€ more also. and when it comes to vulkan and Linux, vega 64 has hard time to fight with 1070Ti in many cases, while some cases its equal with GTX 1080. Cheating or not in drivers,im talking about games, not this superposition benchmark. We will see what AMD will bring, hopefully something good becaus the prices are insanity. AMD is good in the midrange market atm. RX580 and 590 are really good for the money. GTX 1060 doesn't get close in most cases. But AMD lacks cards on higher end sadly.

Quoting: GuestVega 64 is faster than 1070ti in Linux gaming too. [vega 64 vs 1070ti Linux gaming](https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=titan-rtx-linux&num=6)

Victory for open source drivers without cheating. Prices varies country by country, here Asus Vega64 8GB costs 50 euros more than Asus 1070ti 8GB and both are cheapest available.

So its slightly better on those benchmarks, with double the power consumption. Also cheapest Vega 64 i can find here is 628€ while cheapest 1070Ti is 429€. Anyway, its getting too offtopic here. If you want to argue, pm me or create a new discussion.

Quoting: GuestWe beat nvidia fanboys with the RX 3080 at fraction of the GTX 1070Ti cost next year.

So a card that doesn't exist yet might possibly perform better than a competitor's two generations old card in the future, when it's released. There is fanboyism all right, but I don't think it's coming from camp green.

Quoting: callcifer

Quoting: GuestWe beat nvidia fanboys with the RX 3080 at fraction of the GTX 1070Ti cost next year.

So a card that doesn't exist yet might possibly perform better than a competitor's two generations old card in the future, when it's released. There is fanboyism all right, but I don't think it's coming from camp green.

maybe we are not amd fans but just nvidia haters :P

Sorry Xpander :wink:

• +152 GPU Clock Offset


• +900 Memory Transfer Rate Offset


• 300W Power Limit

This seemed like a good way to test whether my new system was working properly. Default install, no tinkering or overclocking just yet.

It does demonstrate that the 20 series is definitely faster if you give it something to do.

Updated!

Quoting: EhvisThis seemed like a good way to test whether my new system was working properly. Default install, no tinkering or overclocking just yet.

It does demonstrate that the 20 series is definitely faster if you give it something to do.

[img]snip

Agreed but going on the price it should be 2 times plus quicker than the 1080 ti for the price it is which it's far from being.

Updated

So, I upgraded my system with budget pieces of ebay, changed CPU from Xeon E3 1231 to i7 4790k and GPU from Asus GTX 970 to Asus GTX 1070. That's all I can do for my platform without investing much more. But I managed to break the wall of 3k score in Superposition, so yeah :D

So I got a setup with the new 2060 and decided to post the results here.

Quoting: GuestThe Superposition benchmark is CPU bound, see the results. The Heaven benchmark is better for stress testing your computer.

Any benchmark can be CPU bound if you run it on a weak enough CPU. Superposition loaded my 2080 Ti 100% all the way through. I'm sure it could do a little better if it wasn't on OpenGL, but CPU bound it was not.

Yep, I agree. Superposition stresses the GPU almost regardless of CPU in my testing. I've run the same GTX 1080 Ti on multiple computers with very different CPUs and the results are extremely similar. Without overclocking the GPU results on i9 9900K and i7 6770HQ are almost identical.

Sorry Wimpress :)



core +100 mem +1000
powerlimit 326W

Can't get core over that because with +100 it hits 2050mhz already and going over that will make it crash :)

New CPU/Mobo/RAM/PSU, same GPU (1070Ti)
Also tweaked clock settings a bit so there's a small improvement now: GPU: +180 VRAM: +1300 Power limit 217W

I was bored enough to make a Google Sheets page with updated results and some improvements (average score per card and charts) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vTU1V6SoGz7-P_pQHbgydeCGYoSsif552-wn6R_EPNA/edit?usp=sharing

Sorry Xpander :wink: Errr, and everyone else :whistle:

Intel Core [email protected] overclock.

• +150 GPU Clock Offset


• +1500 Memory Transfer Rate Offset


• 366W Power Limit

Quoting: WimpressSorry Xpander :wink: Errr, and everyone else :whistle:

Intel Core [email protected] overclock.

...

Cheats! :D

Quoting: Xpander

Quoting: WimpressSorry Xpander :wink: Errr, and everyone else :whistle:

Intel Core [email protected] overclock.

...

Cheats! :D

I think the biggest reason is the 2080ti :wink:

Updated!

Quoting: pete910I think the biggest reason is the 2080ti :wink:

Updated!

Ofc, that CPU doesn't change anything. i just didnt want to quote the picture :)

Quoting: Xpander

Quoting: pete910I think the biggest reason is the 2080ti :wink:

Updated!

Ofc, that CPU doesn't change anything. i just didnt want to quote the picture :)

Just pretend it's not there all together :D

May have to do a rule that limits price say £700 MSRP and under :whistle:

Well, it's something. All thanks to my amazing 82MHz Ryzen CPU!

Updated my Google Sheets as well.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vTU1V6SoGz7-P_pQHbgydeCGYoSsif552-wn6R_EPNA/edit?usp=sharing