Patreon Logo Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal Logo PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
Title: Basemark GPU Benchmark
Page: 1/3
  Go to:
callcifer 23 Jun 2018
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


Inspired by the Unigine Superposition thread, I've decided to create one for the new Basemark GPU benchmark, complete with leaderboards :)

Download the software [here](https://www.basemark.com/products/basemark-gpu/). Arch Linux users might prefer my [AUR package](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/basemark) instead.

Rules:
  • Official Test only. Run twice, once with OpenGL and once with Vulkan (if supported).

  • Post 3 screenshots: [Your specs](https://i.imgur.com/JXIrsNj.png) ("Hardware Info" tab), [OpenGL results](https://i.imgur.com/6DkmCOT.png) and [Vulkan results](https://i.imgur.com/6cJk5fG.png) (if supported).

  • If you are overclocking (CPU or GPU) mention it in the comments.



I will maintain separate leaderboards for OpenGL and Vulkan.

OpenGL Leader Board

Rank - Username - Score - Avg. FPS - CPU + GPU - Post link

1- truebluewoo - 11750 - 118 - i7-4770k + RTX 2080Ti - post link
2- Wimpress - 9075 - 91 - i9 9900k + GTX 1080Ti - post link
3- Xpander - 8194 - 81 - Ryzen 7 1700X + GTX 1080Ti - post link
4- madchaotikan - 8099 - 80 - Xeon E3 1231 + RTX 2080 - post link
5- callcifer - 7997 - 79 - i7 5820k + GTX 1080Ti - post link
6- FredO - 4955 - 49 - i7 5820k + GTX 980Ti - post link
7- entropie - 4180 - 42 - Ryzen 7 2700X + Vega64 - post link
8- 14 - 3710 - 37 - Ryzen 7 2700X + RX 580 - post link

Vulkan Leader Board

Rank - Username - Score - Avg. FPS - CPU + GPU - Post link

1- truebluewoo - 10638 - 106 - i7-4770k + RTX 2080Ti - post link
1- madchaotikan - 9416 - 94 - Xeon E3 1231 + RTX 2080 - post link
2- Wimpress - 7893 - 79 - i9 9900k + GTX 1080Ti - post link
3- callcifer - 7841 - 78 - i7 5820k + GTX 1080Ti - post link
4- Xpander - 7286 - 72 - Ryzen 7 1700X + GTX 1080Ti - post link
5- entropie - 5954 - 60 - Ryzen 7 2700X + Vega64 - post link
6- FredO - 5003 - 50 - i7 5820k + GTX 980Ti - post link
callcifer 23 Jun 2018
I'll start :) I was surprised to see OpenGL vs Vulkan results. While OpenGL had a better score and much higher max. FPS, it also had much lower min. FPS, which was unexpected. I'd rather have a stable framerate than a higher max, so Vulkan is the winner for me.

Specs:
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


OpenGL:
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


Vulkan:
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


Overclock:
CPU: 3.3GHz -> 4.4GHz
GPU: +125MHz graphics clock, +300MHz memory clock
Xpander 23 Jun 2018
Info:
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


OpenGL:
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


Vulkan:
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


4K is bit hard for GPU like this. 1080p or 1440p is more suitable on GPU's below GTX 1080 or Vega 64

Ryzen 7 1700X @3.8ghz
GTX 1070 396.24.02 drivers, core offset +100, mem offset +300

just for fun a more suitable for this GPU - 2560x1440 result:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.
callcifer 23 Jun 2018
Quoting: Xpander4K is bit hard for GPU like this. 1080p or 1440p is more suitable on GPU's below GTX 1080 or Vega 64
Yeah, I wish the official test was 1080p. :/
FredO 24 Jun 2018
OC: GPU: +150MHz graphics clock, +150MHz memory clock

Specs:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


OpenGL:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


Vulkan:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.
Xpander 24 Jun 2018
Update did not have powerlimit increased from 150W to 170W on previous test, so the clocks did not go that high in reality.

same +100 core and +300 memory

OpenGL:
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


Vulkan:
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


now Vulkan minimum seems to be better also. Also i noticed that Vulkan rendering doesnt use CPU allmost at all, just 0.9-1.5% while with openGL i see over 6% of usage (thats not htop numbers but from 100% with 16 thread)
HerrLange 7 Oct 2018
Not sure why basemark is not able to detect my Arch installation.

However I'm really surprised about the notable difference between OpenGL and Vulcan.

You can see my system in my PC Info profile. Everything is running stock. Only exception are the memory modules with does NOT run with their performance profile and clocked defensively to provide maximum stability. I'm not into OC at all.

SPEC
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


OpenGL
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


Vulcan
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.
callcifer 22 Oct 2018
Wow, we have a new #1! The difference between GTX 1080Ti and RTX 2080 seems crazy.
14 31 Oct 2018
User Avatar
  • Supporter Plus
The Vulkan one did not run for me. I'm not even sure that the OpenGL one ran correctly. Instead of a large graphic animation, it was 64 square tiles of changing images.

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.
callcifer 1 Nov 2018
Quoting: 14Instead of a large graphic animation, it was 64 square tiles of changing images.
That's normal, it's just how this benchmark works.
Xpander 1 Nov 2018
Vulkan:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


OpenGL:
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


Info
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


GPU in stock settings.
callcifer 1 Nov 2018
Updated the boards, but your results look very weird. Your 1080Ti managed to outperform madchaotikan's RTX2080 on OpenGL, but significantly underperformed on Vulkan. Is it possibly a CPU thing?
Xpander 1 Nov 2018
Quoting: callciferUpdated the boards, but your results look very weird. Your 1080Ti managed to outperform madchaotikan's RTX2080 on OpenGL, but significantly underperformed on Vulkan. Is it possibly a CPU thing?
it might be, with vulkan running i didnt see any CPU load at all, basically zero, or say 1.5%. with openGL there was 1 thread going max, aka ~6% load in my 16thread cpu. so that might come down to singlethread perf as the OpenGL benchmark never capped GPU utilization also, it was just around 70%. Didnt check the GPU utilization on Vulkan though
Xpander 29 Nov 2018
Ok updated to GPUBenchmark 1.1 but now Vulkan option isn't available for me somehow. DXVK Works, Vulkan Native games work.

OpenGL Result:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.


HW Info:
External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.
callcifer 1 Dec 2018
How/where did you download 1.1?
Xpander 2 Dec 2018
Quoting: callciferHow/where did you download 1.1?
from their site, i think they took it down to fix some issues. It's 3.2GB so if you interested i can upload it somewhere. But i guess its better to wait while they have fixed version up on their website
drlamb 3 Dec 2018
Quoting: Xpander
Quoting: callciferHow/where did you download 1.1?
from their site, i think they took it down to fix some issues. It's 3.2GB so if you interested i can upload it somewhere. But i guess its better to wait while they have fixed version up on their website
Please:)

I find the lack of AMD (vega) results disturbing and I'd like to fix that.
Xpander 3 Dec 2018
Quoting: drlamb
Quoting: Xpander
Quoting: callciferHow/where did you download 1.1?
from their site, i think they took it down to fix some issues. It's 3.2GB so if you interested i can upload it somewhere. But i guess its better to wait while they have fixed version up on their website
Please:)

I find the lack of AMD (vega) results disturbing and I'd like to fix that.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NG1A6VsRRcX7G7yJ7kANnfba6e_WfPmm
pete910 6 Dec 2018
Quoting: drlamb
Quoting: Xpander
Quoting: callciferHow/where did you download 1.1?
from their site, i think they took it down to fix some issues. It's 3.2GB so if you interested i can upload it somewhere. But i guess its better to wait while they have fixed version up on their website
Please:)

I find the lack of AMD (vega) results disturbing and I'd like to fix that.
Good luck with that on vega, Still a no go on vulkan
callcifer 6 Dec 2018
There is a new 1.1.0 release, hopefully with fixes. I've updated the Arch package.

EDIT: OK finally managed to test the new release. No Vulkan option and a worse OpenGL score for me :(
pete910 6 Dec 2018
Quoting: callciferThere is a new 1.1.0 release, hopefully with fixes. I've updated the Arch package.

EDIT: OK finally managed to test the new release. No Vulkan option and a worse OpenGL score for me :(
Replied to you on reddit I think, There's no Vulkan option for me either. AMD RX64

Edit:

What kind of score difference are you seeing ?
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon Logo Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal Logo PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register