While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:
Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.
This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.
This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register
- Founder of Baldur's Gate 3 developer blasts publisher greed
- Proton 9.0 (Beta16) brings more regression fixes, updated Steamworks SDK
- Windows compatibility layer Wine 9.5 released
- Backpack Battles has sold 500,000 copies in two weeks on Steam
- System76 release upgraded Lemur Pro laptop, plus a desktop sale now on
- > See more over 30 days here
-
EA anticheat arrives for Battlefield V in April, will b…
- hell0 -
EA anticheat arrives for Battlefield V in April, will b…
- Purple Library Guy -
SDL 3 will prefer Wayland Over X11, if certain protocol…
- nwildner -
SDL 3 will prefer Wayland Over X11, if certain protocol…
- whizse -
SDL 3 will prefer Wayland Over X11, if certain protocol…
- fenglengshun - > See more comments
Latest Forum Posts
View PC info
For instance, Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night is a particularly high profile title that just recently announced they were going back on their promise to support Mac and Linux. The list notes it as "Failed", but especially given the game is yet to release, there is considerable outcry for the decision etc... perhaps it would be helpful for all interested to express disappointment at this change and urge them to deliver as promised? Having an alternative label for titles that are in need of community help in this regard could be part of a "rallying cry" to help direct readers interested in doing so.
Perhaps the site could also have other features to support this sort of action such as a "sticky" / high visibility link to an article explaining the situation for a given game that needs community attention in some way, but perhaps other status labels in this Crowdfunding Tracker could be a good place to start?
View PC info
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_CARS
edit: Without refund.
I don't think that would really help anything, your example with Bloodstained especially as they quite clearly don't give a toss.
The remnants of the crowd funding campaign are still online at http://www.wmdportal.com/, but the purchase option is gone of course. They may be something more in the web archive.
Please do keep them coming, it's probably out of date once again.
View PC info
If the developer has said "Sorry Linux people, but we can't do a Linux release after all" - That is "Failed" for me.
If the developer has said "Sorry for the delay. We don't know how long it will be, but we hope to still release to Linux eventually" - That is "Failed (but might still appear)" for me.
I'd like to be able to differentiate between these two cases.
Yeah, that's an idea I want to do. Have one that's listed but not counted for either.
Edit: We can now list titles not finished, they will show up as in development and not count towards the total.
View PC info
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/982292262/the-cyanide-and-happiness-adventure-game (stretch goal)
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1552487445/starflint-sci-fi-adventure-game
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/stuckinattic/gibbous-a-cthulhu-adventure
View PC info
Pathologic 2 -- Failed. Not a stretch.
Fell Seal: Arbiter's Mark -- Linux build released. Not a stretch.