Quoting: Brokatt

Quoting: amataiThat's an elegant solution, more inteligent than the frog protocol solution imho.

What exactly is "more intelligent" than Frog Protocols? To a laymen like me they seem to do the exact same thing.

I'm not an expert, but as I see it.
It does not bypass the Wayland consensus, yet both allow for protocol to be added faster (like frog) and the consensus to build faster (which would be problematic for frog due to bypassing the consensus at the root).

I think the consensus is a good thing, and a solution helping it grows faster is better than bypassing it. Project acting against each other by shipping protocols without looking in depth at their interaction with the rest of Wayland seems to my uneducated eye as a recipe for trouble.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

That's an elegant solution, more inteligent than the frog protocol solution imho.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I like how GNOME and KDE are radicaly different. I'm leaning on GNOME interface but the point of Linux is having choices.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: fenglengshunope

Quoting: bonkmaykrI think the reason Github users are angry is not so much because it's no longer free software, but more because the developer is taking GPL-licensed commits he may not legally own and making them his own semi-proprietary work. This is a legal grey area.

This is not, this is a violation of GPL license if the contributor did not explicitly give him permission to relicense their work. Any contributor that did not can sue him as per the GPL license and force him to remove their contribution.

Btw, can CC-BY-ND even be compiled ?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: KlaasWell… this will always be sketchy since Quake (unlike Doom or Quake 3 – not sure about Quake 2 without checking) includes a copy of the used textures in the compiled map file. So if you use maps made for the original game, you use the original textures even if you use this project as a base.

I checked on the project page, Quake is already open source since the 90s, LibreQuake intends to replace proprietary assets.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

[quote=chr]

Quoting: MicromegasI think Itch.io doesn't get much of a say in this. Distributing a specific game can become illegal if some licenses expire (most commonly for music or car brand likeness used in the game), therefore Itch.io requires a method for the game uploader to remove the game from the platform.

I was under the impression that steam was able to keep games that has been bought downloadable even after they stop being sold. I may be mistaken, but if I'm not, that reflects very badly on itch that games that has been bought can disappear.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

With 14 expansion changing gameplay, EU 4 with different set of DLC has 16 000 different gameplay. It is highly probable that only the base game and the game with all DLC are playtested as quality assurance can't be done on the 16 000 different game coming from all the interaction possible from the DLC. So peoples that have just some DLC will have a game with non tested interaction that often leads to problem. The newer DLC are relatively independent, so they did not contribute as much to the problem, but all the legacy DLC remains. Merging some DLC to the base game is a way for Paradox to reduce QA complexity. Art of War for example change a lot of stuff about how war is working, so having this as a DLC lead to having to develop two war system for the same game and implementing every new feature for the two war system.

This move is not so much a gift to players than a way for Paradox to reduce development cost.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: AdutchmanAlso: I don't really like the way some people draw modern Microsoft as the arch enemy of Linux.

Maybe because of the recent breaking of most of the Linux dual boot due to a windows update.
Compagny as a whole are friendlier with Linux, still no company (and no institution as well) is as adversial to Linux than Microsoft, even as a big chunk of their revenue come from Linux adjacent products.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I am very surprised nobody made a pun on the name. I mean Arch...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I have a mixed feeling about Flatpack. I have the impression it tries to replace package repositery whereas the problem is that distribution repository should be extended.
We don't need flatpack or snap or whatever for Mozzila, Gnome or KDE softwares. The FOSS software from highly trusted source are the easiest things to maintain on distribution repo. Flathub should be mostly commercial or more obscure FOSS project and software store app should be able to mix distro software when it makes the most sense and packaged software.

View this comment - View article - View full comments