It is pricey but I'm genuinely interested in one of those desktops solely for the energy efficiency. You more or less get a full entry level PC under 100 watts. Electricity is only going to get more expensive and we seem to have a new global crisis every few years now, pushing prices further up.
Add in the fact that we seem to heavily start to stagnate now with overall performance improvements (and said improvements often needing even more power consumption) and I imagine one of those could last a decent while (not to mention it could make for a good TV console after it ages out as the main PC). It heavily depends on where you live but the savings from power consumption could actually make it worthwhile for some.
Give it 1-2 more generations and I might actually buy one.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

If there were a more powerful Steam machine to run the games and the list of supported devices gets regularly updated in the anti-cheat, I would almost accept it as a possible(albeit limited) solution. It certainly beats having to dual-boot Windows for me.

But man, does this feel like a mess. I would've hoped that Valve would at least throw some ideas into the room by now. But it seems like they'll leave it to the developers to figure something out.

At least the Steam Deck is still selling well. Pretty incredible considering that most major titles either don't run or barely scrape by on lowest settings. Gives me hope that we'll reach some threshold one day.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

The lack of upscaling aside from DLSS was baffling to say the least.
Here, have this game with mandatory raytracing and most settings only affecting VRAM usage. But offer enough upscaling solutions? Nah.

Also, XESS 1.4? Did I miss something? When did that happen? There isn't even a release on the Github page.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Microsoft might be the most baffling one out of all of them.
They literally had the opportunity to bundle a store directly into the OS that's synonymous with PC gaming, especially at the time where Proton was many years away. They had the chance to dominate like with Internet Explorer.

And they failed. Badly. Apple and Google enjoy massive profits with their stores. Microsoft's consoles are falling behind.
And aside from Gamepass, their store is probably one of the last places someone would buy games from. Meanwhile, the Steam Deck shows people that PC gaming is getting very good outside of Windows and that it's not a requirement anymore.

It's genuinely fascinating just how much they fumbled in pretty much any aspect possible.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I view it pretty relaxed. A Steam Machine is not a traditional console. They don't need to sell tens of millions to get developer support and they're not dependent on it to make money.
While all of the areas of improvement will impact sales(especially anti-cheat), I believe that it could still do decent numbers, even in its current state.

I do think that people understand that similar limitations like the Steam Deck apply and base their decision based on that. And as long as it increases marketshare, it's a win in my book.

But given the limitations, I do believe that they might need to focus on the lower end to compete. More in line with a Series S. It's a great little console that was butchered by the lack of RAM. As long as Valve doesn't make the same mistake, I imagine people would be interested.
A PC or PlayStation as the main device and an affordable Steam Machine to bring PC games to the big screen.
That's probably the best they could for a 1st generation device.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I already got the original version of Sims 2 working on my Steam Deck with Lutris, so I'm not really interested. But I might get it once it's cheap enough for convenience.

I wonder if custom content works with it.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I understand why this wasn't a thing. It would've been a 720p/30 console in 2022 and even the decade old PS4 has better graphics. But since I've seen a decent number of people using the Deck exclusively docked, I do wonder just how cheap they could've made it.

No screen. No controls. No battery. Throw in a decent bit of storage.
Maybe 200$? Could be genuine competition to those tiny Intel machines but with decent graphic performance on top.
At that price I could see quite a few people just getting one to round out their main console with some PC exclusives. And it could be a new Steam Link alternative as well.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I've been waiting for crossplay since release because I want to play with a few friends. Glad to see it might finally be here soon.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

If the translation is accurate, it really sounds like they want to use NVK over Nvidia's own drivers. Which is quite interesting. Aside from it's early state, the lack of features like DLSS would be a deal breaker for most. That's one of the main things why you would choose Nvidia over the competition.
Maybe Valve is trying to convince Nvidia to expose DLSS as a proprietary library that could be called from Open Source code? That seems like the best compromise to me.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Given the pace so far, it's probably still gonna be a few years until we get a proper desktop version of SteamOS. I could see 2025/26 being mainly about supporting all kinds of handhelds and maybe a console somewhere in 2026. That's the main form factor where SteamOS outshines Windows and the ideal chance to increase market share.

And once all that is done, there's still plenty that needs to be done on the desktop front for it to compete. We can't even be sure if they actually want to do a dedicated desktop version. Maybe it's gonna stay a console OS primarily and leave the general desktop space for others.

View this comment - View article - View full comments