Patreon Logo Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal Logo PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
Latest Comments by Purple Library Guy
Intel reveals their Core Ultra 200V 'Lunar Lake' available starting September 24
4 Sep 2024 at 3:14 am UTC Likes: 6

So I heard that Intel's fortunes started to turn to crap after they got themselves their first MBA CEO, instead of an engineer. Just like Boeing.

Square Enix invests in Playtron for their Linux-based PlaytronOS - first Alpha out now
4 Sep 2024 at 3:06 am UTC Likes: 4

Quoting: Vortex_Acherontic
Quoting: missingnoI know not to get my hopes up that this could lead to native ports, but hold on, you're telling me this thing can't even run native titles anyway? Why the hell not?
Actually it is not that simple to properly support native Linux games. I know this sounds ridiculous but her me out.
It sounds ridiculous when you're basing your OS on one that already supports native Linux games.

Make it so, engage or something for the Steam Space Exploration Fest
3 Sep 2024 at 6:35 pm UTC

I think Avorion on my wishlist being 50% off has something to do with this.

Steam Survey for August 2024 shows Linux just below 2% as China surges
3 Sep 2024 at 6:32 pm UTC Likes: 2

Quoting: CatKiller
Quoting: Purple Library Guy
Quoting: CatKiller
Quoting: Purple Library GuySomeone definitely needs to be getting the Chinese onto Linux.
How Microsoft Conquered China [External Link]
Yeah, I know. But that's not set in stone for all time. If MS can screw up for a while and then come up with a strategy that works, so can we.
Sure. But things like having meetings with government representatives, massive investment in the country, and education and employment for the citizens are things that any competitor would have to be able to counter. Being cheaper and having source code access won't do much because Windows also has those things in China. Just being better in some aspects wouldn't be sufficient to move the needle. There's a whole lot going on with Microsoft's relationship with China, and it took decades (and a whole lot of money and commitment) to achieve.
Things have changed, in ways that may become relevant. Back then, China was Open For Business and wanted to be buddy-buddy with the US and everyone, and the US elites were like "Friend! You make us profits!" China's overall deal was, come in foreign corporations and profit from us, as long as you bring us knowhow and technology. Now, they have the knowhow and technology and they're increasingly backing their own homegrown companies; plus, the Americans have turned the dial most of the way towards hostile, making it increasingly a risk for China to rely on foreign, and particularly American, technologies. That would include Microsoft products.
As the Chinese government works its way down checklists of what could make it vulnerable to embargos in a cold war, it may well hit "software".

Harebrained (BATTLETECH / Shadowrun) announced GRAFT, a post-cyberpunk survival horror RPG
3 Sep 2024 at 6:20 pm UTC Likes: 2

Quoting: CatKiller
one Shadowrun fans might like to take a look at
I did really enjoy the Shadowrun games even though I don't generally get on with RPGs.
So did I. But this doesn't look turn-based. Cool and atmospheric and all, but I'm kind of crap at combat games so this is probably not for me.

Square Enix invests in Playtron for their Linux-based PlaytronOS - first Alpha out now
3 Sep 2024 at 6:12 pm UTC Likes: 3

The first hardware that will be actually using it is the SuiPlay0x1, a strange looking and sounding web3 / blockchain handheld.
Yeah, that's not a good sign.

Steam Survey for August 2024 shows Linux just below 2% as China surges
3 Sep 2024 at 5:32 am UTC

Quoting: CatKiller
Quoting: Purple Library GuySomeone definitely needs to be getting the Chinese onto Linux.
How Microsoft Conquered China [External Link]
Yeah, I know. But that's not set in stone for all time. If MS can screw up for a while and then come up with a strategy that works, so can we.

Run a paranormal investigation business in point and click adventure The Phantom Fellows
2 Sep 2024 at 5:37 pm UTC

So does that mean if he's having some steamy time with a significant other he's got this dead dude watching?

Steam Survey for August 2024 shows Linux just below 2% as China surges
2 Sep 2024 at 5:34 pm UTC Likes: 2

Someone definitely needs to be getting the Chinese onto Linux.

Black Myth: Wukong shows very clearly Valve are selling a lot of Steam Decks
1 Sep 2024 at 6:11 pm UTC Likes: 1

Quoting: slaapliedje
Quoting: Purple Library Guy
Quoting: slaapliedje
Quoting: TheBard
So then, how about Fortnite on Linux / Steam Deck? Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney said when it hits "tens of millions of users" that it "would actually make sense to support it". We must be pretty close by now right? Why ignore a platform that's sold multiple millions, and is clearly just continuing to fly off the shelves?
I've seen more consistency in /dev/random's output than Tim Sweeney's statements.
Quoting: Eike
Quoting: Cato-the-youngerIt also has further downstream knockon social effects that dont end up benefitting you.
Which ones?
The current ones that seem to be popping up is where certain people can't get promotions or hired because of their ethnicity isn't 'diverse' enough. There are lawsuits, for example, against IBM for not promoting someone who has been at the company for decades, but was told more or less that he would not be promoted because he wasn't diverse enough... then you have Gina Carano suing Disney for wrongful termination, etc. If you go looking through various codes of conduct (Gnome for example) and they're clearly racist against people who are white.

'Woke' is basically an ideology that says the minorities should be the majority and that the majority should bend the knee for being awful.
When you can show me a place where white males make less money on average than minorities, or have less wealth on average than minorities, I'll start to care. If you look at the stats, you will notice that there are NO signs of this coming close to happening. And despite all the anecdotal whining, they've done experiments in the US: They do sets of loan applications and job applications in pairs that are identical except one has a typically "white-sounding" name attached to it and the other has a typically "black-sounding" name attached to it. The ones assumed to be white get hired more often, get the loans more often, and if both get the loans the "black-sounding" name on average gets charged a higher interest rate. So for now all the bitching and moaning from white males about how terribly they're treated because of wokeness and reverse discrimination is going to get from me a sad song on the world's smallest violin.

God, I just get so ashamed of what fucking wimps many of my fellow white males are.
Ah, so what you're saying is the cure for racism is more racism? I believe that the answer to it is fairness across the board. There's a culture issue going on, it has less to do about what color your skin is and what culture you're from. There are a lot of individuals who escape that culture, and others do not.

If people are getting screwed over based on what color their skin is, than it is wrong, period. That's the whole purpose of discrimination laws.
Discrimination laws might get the job done in much of Europe, where the class system is relatively compressed, social programs exist and pretty much work, education is cheap or free and fairly equally delivered, unions are widespread and sectoral bargaining means most people not in a union still pretty much have a union contract. And where, far as I can make out, people take such laws fairly seriously. I have doubts, but sure, maybe.

In the US, such laws do little.
(hidden is explanation of why)
Spoiler, click me
Hierarchy is much steeper there and natural opportunities for class mobility much more constrained. So for instance, in the US, most people can be fired from their job for no reason. So it's illegal to fire someone because they are from some race or religion, or because they're trying to start a union, but it's not illegal to just fire them without saying why. Similarly, as long as you don't say why you didn't hire someone, or didn't give them a loan, or whatever . . . and indeed lots of people charging a black family higher interest for a loan or not hiring a black for a management job aren't being consciously racist; they're just white people who have a "sense" for who's higher risk or who's not a "fit", which sense somewhere at the back of their mind involves blackness as a risk factor. And of course, nearly all the people making these decisions are white. They're not going to notice this stuff--it has no impact on anyone they know. Incidentally, when there's talk about AI doing racist stuff, it's because they fed the AIs on data from this kind of decision maker and it took in the tacit bias from the data it got fed.

Or if you look at education--in the United States, primary and high school education are locally funded by property taxes, and property values vary wildly, so poor neighborhoods have very crappy schools. But wait, there's more! Federal funding tends to go preferentially to schools which are already performing well (not by accident, by design; it's supposed to be an incentive to compete), which is to say not the poor ones. And of course for the rich there are lots of private schools. And just having gone to schools known to be bad makes you less hireable. Since neighborhoods are also very segregated, and blacks are much poorer than whites on average, functionally "black schools" suck and make people less able to get hired.

There's a whole constellation of this kind of stuff all kind of working together.
To make antiracism laws perform effectively, you'd have to do massive witch hunts. You think people bitch about affirmative action, discrimination laws strong enough and strongly enforced enough to work in the US would be just insane police state shit. It's probably less intrusive just to have a quota. And the idea is that once the numbers are about in tune with population sizes, it also won't be just whites (or males) making the hiring decisions and so forth . . . there will be people in the decision-making part of the system to whom the whole setup isn't invisible. I would agree that there are drawbacks, but if you're going to have a steeply hierarchical and unequal system in the first place, nothing is going to work really well when it comes to trying to make people equal.