Quoting: mr-victoryThis situation sounds to me like this:
"Google vs Microsoft! Round 2! Fight!!"
Round 1 is obviously the market for smart phones. And we know the winner :grin:

round 1 was google vs windows live search, then bing.
round 2 was android vs windows phone.

as for the round 3, we are years into this battle.

honesly i dont trust google anymore, they seem to want to play this game as an winner takes it all approach, android didnt helped linux desktop, stadia dont seem to help much either, and steam seem to be their last option to bring games to chromebooks to fight the OS war, their plan B.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: MohandevirMaybe it needed a little more time in the Experimental oven?

that is why its called experimental to begin with.
its like when i used non LTS ubuntu then complained all the time.
experimental folks test it to make sure its stable enough for people who dont want to be beta testers.

well, i like valve rating system, they market Guilty Gear X2 #Reload as umplayable, and i know the issue with it is the cutscenes missing, if we depend on protonDB it would be rated as "platinum" so despite some errors, i think they are still doing better, hopefully it will be fixed soon for those games with errors, either fixed the rating or the games, i think those games miss labeled should be priority to fix, so consumers who purchased based on those rates wont get disapointed.

BlazBlue: Calamity Trigger is marked as unplayable, great, the 2 i'm waiting...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

omg, i just posted this news in a forum (facebook comunity) then i update the GOL tab and here it is...
i quoted direct from WineHQ, if is saw that you posted this before i would put this news instead.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: CalinouThis can be done in Godot 3.x too with a two-Viewport setup:

omg i saw an video about this a few days ago, rendering the game in low-res to save processing power while render the text in high res for redability.

can this trick be used to apply FSR on one viewport (the 3D one) while ignore it on the other?
[edit]
actually you just said its possible, but have you tried?

Quoting: 3zekielit will introduce temporal artifacts, (reverse) ghosting

god... read this phrase out of context, that sounds like sci-fi...
"yeah yeah , our time machine will introduce some temporal artifacts, like reverse ghosting but we can fix that with that <lot of techinical terms for an solution>

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: CalinouThese motion vectors will also be useful for a motion blur implementation in the long run.

i hate when good news come togheter with bad news...
i mean, i didnt knew godot didnt had support for motion blur...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

the list is growing slower...
to be fair, some titles passed as verified then rolled back to unsuported in the past, so maybe valve is trying to improve their Q/A and that is why its moving slower, but still, that is a bad sign, an console need to sustain momentum.

hopefully its a temporray thing and they will double down their speed when they figure out an better way to do Q/A...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: elmapul

Quoting: somebody1121I hope they release the source code soon so godot 4 can add this (Although it need some TAA implementation first for the motion vectors)

i dont think they have enough man power for that, it would only delay vulkan, i think they will focus on deliver vulkan on 4.0, bring back openGL at 4.1, and those extra features either will go at =>4.2x or 5.0x.

one thing i think they could implement though, that shouldnt require too much effort to add is some form of rendering the text in a different render contex so FSR 1.0 could work on everything else from the game, then you render the text as the last step in an higher resolution instead of upscaling it.
(something like an text overlay on top of the game render.)

i think its doable.

HOLY GUACAMOLE! its a bit strange to self quote, but...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JBZj7u3U6k [External Link]

that! if godot can do that, FSR 1.0 will happen.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Doc Angelo

Quoting: elmapulisnt that the definition of ASIC?

I'm not sure what you mean. The Tensor cores?

yup

View this comment - View article - View full comments

is there any advantage of using stream deck over, i dont know... a phone? it dont seem something hard to replicate

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: iskaputt

Quoting: elmapul

Quoting: iskaputt

Quoting: Doc AngeloThe meaning of the terms around "artificial intelligence" are weird

"Machine Learning" is a huge pile of buzzword/b*llsh*t bingo. That's just how it is.

sigh, no it isnt.
go learn how it work and what is possible with it, you have no idea what you're talking about.

on a side note, i can agree that the term "learn" is miss leading, its like calling an AI an inteligent system, as if the machine could "think", that i agree , its bullshit.

I'm strictly speaking about the rhetoric used around ML, to be fair that wasn't clear in my comment. What's coming from that field in terms of results is impressive at times.

As you seem to be knowledgeable about the topic, how far has it come on the "explainability"? Last time I dived deeper into ML (like a couple years ago) the "why" was pretty sketchy (coming from a more classic statistical modelling POV) and there was that whole issue about decisions made with these models no one could really understand (like ML-based credit ratings). I know there have been some advancements, but I'm not following ML closely. But I'm watching the occasional talk in academia about ML being used for some specific problem and that didn't bode well for the answer.

im not an expert, i saw a few videos explaining the process, but i'm not an data scientist or anything and dont have an good video to recomend from the top of my head.
i was just a bit pissed off by what you said, but as you explained, it was just an miss fortunate choice of words, so lets ignore that.

i agree that a LOT of companies are puting machine learn as an buzz world to market their tech to investors or end users, but the area as an whole isnt limited to that.
unlike metaverse...

View this comment - View article - View full comments