Interesting talk. Very cool to see some insights.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

The acquisition of GitHub makes perfect sense for Microsoft. They see their future in cloud services/Azure with Amazon and Google as their strongest competitors. With a GitHub-Azure integration they can offer the perfect CI pipeline in the cloud from source code hosting to platform hosting all with their own services, most Microsoft development solutions where all-in-one tools. This gives them quite an advantage over Amazon and Google. I don't think that anything will change for all the Open Source projects on GitHub, at least not with their current CEO. They need the GitHub community and the users to keep GitHub as the de-facto standard for professional source code hosting in the cloud. For earning money they are focusing on companies that already have or will have (private) repositories at GitHub and provide them a very smooth way straight to Azure (and not that smooth to Amazon/Google) for platform hosting.

I would have preferred GitHub as an independent vendor. That said I'm glad that Microsoft acquired them and not e.g. Oracle or Facebook.

Having a strategy for opting-out applies to all cloud services, not just for GitHub that happened to be acquired by Microsoft.

PS: Congrats to the GitHub CEO's.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

No idea...
Since we are talking about the radar, does anyone has an idea what the Mac only game ("Save poor Bob if you please") could be?)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Currently I'm looking forward to "Life is Strange BTS". "Oxygen not included" (once out of EA) looks certainly interesting too.
A dream would be "Shadow of the Tomb Raider", though I guess I have to keep wishing for that one for at least the next 3 years ;)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Whitewolfe80Am of two minds on this on one hand its amazing how much progress wine is making and how much work the mesa team are putting in to make amd/intel graphics viable as a gaming option on linux. However I am also a little worried that Valve and other big developers thinking well we dont need to do a native linux port we can do a wine wrapper or failing that we can just leave it windows only and the linux community will figure out the dependancies to get to to work under wine.

Yes, this worries me too. But it can go both ways and also be a boost for Linux. Let's see what happens..
From the technical side this project is astonishing, and I have only just tested the Unique benchmarks.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: liamdawe

Quoting: STiATGood to see that amd/valve vulkan developers actually fixed driver bugs because of DXVK finding them, like rendering glitches in WoW & The Witness (fixed 7 days ago, so I guess it will hit with the next mesa bugfix release).

Yeah it's pretty interesting that projects like this can give the Mesa developers a much bigger set of games to test against and improve.

I guess the same goes for NVidia. DXVK is a perfect project to harden and stabilize their new shader compiler. I guess that is one of the reasons why their devs are quite active at the DXVK github project. Win-win for both.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Both Tomb Raider episodes are for me the best of the best of Linux gaming (fingers crossed that part 3 is also coming to Linux at some point)!
Thanks for all your work and all the best for your future path!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Eike

Quoting: TheSHEEEPBut: What I say is that there is a difference between hypocrites (people who say A and do B) and do-gooders (people who say A, do A, claim that A is good, but A is actually a bad thing once you think about it more deeply).

So, a try-do-gooder?

A naive hypocrite then? :)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Doc Angelo

Quoting: EikeLanguage is not something happening to us, it's something made by us. I feel (strongly), we shouldn't perpetuate the connotation of "doing good" and something bad. (There's something similar in German with "Gutmensch" (eng: "good human".))

I hate the term "Gutmensch". It just feels wrong to paint this rather straightforward term in a bad light. "Scheingutmensch" would be more fitting.

I can understand the definition of TheSHEEEP regarding "do-gooder" and where this is coming from. I know way too many people who tell about doing good all the time, but rarely put action behind their words. I also know people who are phrasing their views in over the top language, something like "all foreigners are nice and lovely!". Some people just love to appear as (purportedly) political correct as possible. That's a problem. But it's also a problem that many people who actually do something good - because they thought about it and came to the conclusion that they want to do this - sound just the same at first glance.

I really think "Scheingutmensch" in German and something like "pseu-do-gooder" would be more fitting and not as misleading.

I would go for "hypocrite", or in German "scheinheilig".

Just to be sure: From what I read here I'm pretty certain that Eike does not fall into the category of being hypocrite/"scheinheilig" ;)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: TheSHEEEP

Quoting: tuubiHowever, it's a fair bet that a person who enjoys conflict and being a dick towards strangers turns out to be a self-centered bastard

The problem here to me seems to be that just being honest and speaking some uncomfortable truths is already enough for many to consider someone a dick.

Speaking out some uncomfortable truths and being offending are not related imho. Depending on _how_ you state an opinion it can always go both ways. Targeting the person (you are a ..) is usually the way to offend someone. Whereas giving an opinion only from ones own perspective (I think/guess that..) keeps the respect towards the audience, even when stating something uncomfortable. Well, that's what I think (and try to do) ;).

But sure, people react differently, especially with written communication and even more when history is involved.

View this comment - View article - View full comments