Do you have lots of wolves tamed? Good noise, they will no longer annoy the heck out of you by howling constantly.

Goddamit, Liam. I genuinely went to edit the article before I remembered how much you love a pun! :tongue:

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: elmapul

Quoting: scaineMeanwhile game streaming has as a couple of really difficult problems to address, like input latency,

input lag? before microsoft relased xbox series and sony relased ps5, digital foundry made an analysys comparing the input lag of xbox one x, with stadia on red dead redemption.
guess what? the input lag on stadia was lower!

Okay...? It's still a problem though. I certainly noticed it numerous times on Destiny 2.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I'm nowhere near convinced that streaming games will see the same uptake as music and video. Those latter worked because the source is static. There's no input, no latency, no interaction beyond play/pause/next/previous.

Meanwhile game streaming has as a couple of really difficult problems to address, like input latency, cost of hardware required to allow people to play at a decent quality, lack of access to modding. Sure, there's a whole host of casual gaming experiences that this might be a reasonable fit for, but it'll be a long, long time before "gamers" are ready to give up their big rigs and embrace the various trade-offs streaming entails.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: axredneck

Quoting: ShabbyXMaybe they used to have a whole distro with every irrelevant lib and app installed, then went and trimmed that. Like I think LibreOffice is installed by default on many distros, but obviously the deck doesn't need that.

It's Arch, it doesn't have anything "irrelevant" preinstalled.

It's not Arch. It's SteamOS, which is arch-based. It can, and likely will, have plenty of "irrelevant" libraries, since Valve will no doubt be thinking of use-cases we have no sight of just yet. It could be literally crammed full of what we'd consider to be irrelevant baggage.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I just can't believe that they a) they didn't test b) they pushed on a Friday and then, the final nail c) they did absolutely nothing about it all weekend. Incompetent.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I think I've explained the position pretty well here. As I say, if you can't understand this, you either don't understand the industry issues (such as redistribution rights, copyright, etc), or you're being deliberately obstinate because you feel your "rights" are being infringed, or some such.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I'm normally really supportive of even the worst Humble Choice months... but this is honestly the worst Choice bundle I've ever seen. The "star" of the show is presumably Mordhau, a game with a reputation for its toxic community... nope.

I'll pass this month, which I think is my first pass this year, actually, so I can't complain too hard.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: kuhpunkt

Quoting: hummer010

Quoting: kuhpunkt

Quoting: scaine

Quoting: torkel104I just found out about this dev's anti-consumer practices which made me lose all interest in this game

Are you referring to the fact that GeForce Now put Hinterland's game up on their platform without a written agreement? I guess, technically, you can say it's "anti-consumer". But Nvidia were in the wrong here, not Hinterland. This would be like Netflix just putting a Disney film on their service and then people getting mad at Disney when they pull it. Sure, get mad, I guess, but this is how consumerism works, obviously.

How were Nvidia in the wrong here, though?

How weren't they? They didn't have permission.

Permission for what? It's none of the devs business where I play my game. I could launch it here on my desktop PC and stream it via Remote Play to my old Laptop.

It's the same exact thing with Geforce Now. I launch MY GAME from MY ACCOUNT, just on a remote PC.

A remote PC you own. Via a service (Steam) that the developer has granted rights to distribution for. Neither is true of GeForce Now.

If you can't see that, you're being obstinate. And I get it. I'm not arguing that the consumer loses out here. But if you truly can't see why Nvidia is in the wrong here, you're just not being realistic.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: hummer010

Quoting: kuhpunkt

Quoting: scaine

Quoting: torkel104I just found out about this dev's anti-consumer practices which made me lose all interest in this game

Are you referring to the fact that GeForce Now put Hinterland's game up on their platform without a written agreement? I guess, technically, you can say it's "anti-consumer". But Nvidia were in the wrong here, not Hinterland. This would be like Netflix just putting a Disney film on their service and then people getting mad at Disney when they pull it. Sure, get mad, I guess, but this is how consumerism works, obviously.

How were Nvidia in the wrong here, though?

How weren't they? They didn't have permission.

Yeah, the grey area here is that GeForce Now don't sell you games. They link through to your Steam, GoG or Epic accounts and then you can play those games via their service. But the problem with this is that the experience is therefore linked to GeForce Now - if they offer a terrible experience, that reflects on the game being played, and since the developers didn't even know it was happening, you potentially get this weird situation where bugs are being reported for a platform that neither the developer, nor the player can affect.

It's utterly baffling that Nvidia didn't ask permission for this up front. Just... baffling.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: torkel104I just found out about this dev's anti-consumer practices which made me lose all interest in this game

Are you referring to the fact that GeForce Now put Hinterland's game up on their platform without a written agreement? I guess, technically, you can say it's "anti-consumer". But Nvidia were in the wrong here, not Hinterland. This would be like Netflix just putting a Disney film on their service and then people getting mad at Disney when they pull it. Sure, get mad, I guess, but this is how consumerism works, obviously.

View this comment - View article - View full comments