Patreon Logo Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal Logo PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
Latest Comments by Shmerl
Developers And The Dreaded Platform Listing Of "PC"
18 Nov 2013 at 1:23 am UTC

Quoting: Quote from intokSure they did, Ubuntu has been by far and away the most popular desktop distro for nearly a decade.
Did you read the thread above? For nearly a decade Canonical hyped it as such. I never saw them showing any numbers which could demonstrate it, I doubt they even can. I don't buy hype talk.

Valve shouldn't care about arguments of what distros users prefer. They care about how to develop a system that will serve their goal (to be a good console gaming OS). They can as well make a distro from scratch, but it all boils down to cost and efficiency. You are looking at this from users perspective, but that's wrong, Valve looks at it from system designers perspective and they have their own priorities. Using Wayland based metaditros in the future has all the advantages, using Mir based Ubuntu has none, since Ubuntu own reasons are not logical, or at least not technically reasonable. Valve doesn't even benefit from any Ubuntu specific bits - they aren't going to use Unity or anything the like. So what does Ubuntu give Valve as a base, that Debian or Gentoo don't for example? If you say Valve can follow the same reasoning as Canonical did to think that Mir is so great that it's worth to split themselves from the majority of the Linux world, then we'll just have to wait and see if it's so or not.

Their choice of Ubuntu as a primary support target for Steam was done before all this Mir story came out. If they'd to decide knowing all this, they could chose differently. My point is, nothing prevents them from doing that now, for the future of their Steam OS development. It's not even out yet. Things change and old plan can fall short of expectations.

For example Google based their ChromeOS on Ubuntu originally as well, but later switched to Gentoo. It's not about popularity, it's what works for them.

Developers And The Dreaded Platform Listing Of "PC"
18 Nov 2013 at 12:49 am UTC

Quoting: Quote from intok
Quoting: Quote from ShmerlAbout why Valve could drop Ubuntu - it doesn't make any sense from practical point. When Ubuntu can remain the only isolated distro using Mr, why should Valve risk making it their primary base?

Simple, if 80% of the Linux gamers/Valve Linux customers are using Ubuntu and therefore will be using Mir then not supporting it is shooting yourself in the foot.
First of all, Valve didn't have any numbers before they rolled out Linux support (it didn't exist for them) and afterwards numbers were always skewed because they said Ubuntu only is officially supported distro, so that 80% don't mean much to estimate what users could otherwise use.

Secondly, that's not the point anyway, since we were talking about Seam OS, not about what distros users install Steam on. Steam OS is Valve's creation and whatever users use now is irrelevant to what they will decide to base it on. What's important is common middleware, efficient development and future compatibility. Mir is not a common middleware (and I doubt it will ever be, time will tell). The bulk of development in the graphics stack happens in Wayland, not in Mir. So, Valve's decision is pretty obvious here, unless they want to shoot themselves in the foot and say - we are going to ignore all that, and use Canonical's Ubuntu only solution.

Developers And The Dreaded Platform Listing Of "PC"
17 Nov 2013 at 5:27 pm UTC

Quoting: Quote from liamdaweShow me hard facts to prove otherwise than Ubuntu being the most popular distro and I may believe it.
No, you claimed (like Canonical usually does), that Ubuntu is the most popular distro. So it's up to you to prove it if you want your claim to be more than just a guess. If it's just a guess - then we can guess anything. Valve's numbers aren't useful, since they chose Ubuntu as their sole supported target.

Quoting: Quote from liamdaweFor me I feel it was needed, most newbies who hear of Linux will probably think of Ubuntu anyway. Every single person I have ever asked in "real life" has only heard of Ubuntu and I talk to people about Linux quite regularly.
I know a lot of people who use Ubuntu. I know a lot of people who use openSUSE as well, or Debian for example. That doesn't however indicate global popularity and I won't use that as a metric to evaluate any market share. Statistics can be very misleading when the numbers are extrapolated way beyond what they are useful for.

Developers And The Dreaded Platform Listing Of "PC"
17 Nov 2013 at 5:21 pm UTC

Quoting: Quote from scaineSo you shoot down one guess, Shmerl, that Ubuntu is the most popular distro, then fire off two wild guesses of your own, that Steam will drop Ubuntu as a base, and that no one else will ever use Mir.
Since we're speculating wildly, here's my wild guesses. Valve will continue to back Ubuntu for the simple reason that they're the only Linux distro which is both focused on the consumer space AND has a company/resources behind it.
That's another myth which Canonical likes to PR. Firstly, Canonical is not profitable lately, so I'd question their resources in the long run. Secondly, there are several other distros which are focused on consumers and work with partnerships (with Dell and others). So, let's stop tossing myths around.

About why Valve could drop Ubuntu - it doesn't make any sense from practical point. When Ubuntu can remain the only isolated distro using Mr, why should Valve risk making it their primary base?

Quoting: Quote from scaineAlso, Mir. Yeah, now that's a super-heated topic, but really it's too early to tell. If I were wearing my cynical hat though, I'd suggest that Canonical's earlier backing of Wayland, only to drop it for Mir was suspiciously close to the point that Valve got involved with Linux after seeing how Windows 8 was turning out. I wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that Mir was born so that Canonical can work more closely with Valve's vision of SteamOS in a way that they couldn't with a community run display protocol such as Wayland.
Canonical never hid the fact what was driving it - their Ubuntu Touch and mobile push. For some really weird reason, unlike Jolla they found that using Wayland didn't fit their mobile plans. Those reasons were surely non technical. Valve has nothing to do with Ubuntu Touch and doesn't benefit from it in any way. It would be utterly stupid for them to back up Canonical's homemade display server making them supporting the majority of the Linux distros harder. Anyway, regarding actual SteamOS we'll have to wait and see. For now they are surely going to use X.org anyway, so the point above isn't critically important (yet). This will become an issue when EGL drivers from Nvidia (and/or AMD) for Wayland (and Mir) will be available.

Developers And The Dreaded Platform Listing Of "PC"
17 Nov 2013 at 7:26 am UTC

Ubuntu is the single most popular distro around
No matter how many times I asked, no one was able to produce any substantial numbers, or explain methodology which demonstrates that Ubuntu is the most used Linux distro. Surely Canonical likes to hype it in most arrogant fashion, but hype does not equal to a fact. So until this is actually demonstrated, I don't buy this argument.

It is the only distro Steam officially supports for a reason.
I'm not sure what their reasons were - Valve didn't really explain it clearly. And in the future, I'd expect them to drop Ubuntu as a base, if they want to stay in touch with the majority of the Linux world which said strong no to Mir, and will use Wayland.

On the matter of "PC" being used to describe Windows - that's very annoying indeed. Complain to developers who do it, and point out the weirdness of such usage. It's an unfortunate artifact left by the years of insane domination of Windows. It will get better, and people will stop using it this way. But it will take time.

Shadowrun Returns RPG To Go DRM Free
14 Nov 2013 at 1:23 am UTC

Did you try asking HB about it?

Shadowrun Returns RPG To Go DRM Free
14 Nov 2013 at 1:03 am UTC

stan: Check out this list: http://pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Humble_Store [External Link]
If you buy anything through the widget with your e-mail you used for HB account, then those games get added to your HB library.

Race The Sun High Speed Racer New Version
8 Nov 2013 at 4:57 am UTC

It's available on sale on GOG, and you can get the Linux version DRM free using the code provided there. See http://www.gamingonlinux.com/forum/topic/458?page=1 for details.

Metro: Last Light Released for Linux on Steam
6 Nov 2013 at 3:51 am UTC

n30p1r4t3: DrMcCoy expressed it well. One should try as much as possible, so the argument that 100% isn't possible is not really useful. DRM is like unethical pollution. You should avoid its proliferation with each opportunity.

I disagree with your idea that DRM is needed to make money. DRM is useless, since it doesn't prevent piracy. In practice DRM is only used for nefarious purposes - controlling the user, controlling the technology, controlling the market and so on. And then you should think about derivatives of DRM, such as DMCA 1201 and other such junk, which are even more evil. Unlike DRM, closed / non free software is by far not always used for nefarious purposes just because it's closed. But DRM - always, really, since DRM has no sensible and ethical reason to ever be used.

I never really encountered a situation when DRMed product had higher quality and usability than alternative DRM free one. The presence of DRM itself is equal to crippling of usability of the product, and therefore it always means reduced quality.

Metro: Last Light Released for Linux on Steam
5 Nov 2013 at 9:01 pm UTC

Quoting: Quote from Caldazar
Quoting: QuoteHowever, if you're going to use these games, you're better off using them on GNU/Linux rather than on Microsoft Windows.
Richard Stallman [External Link]

The man knows the nuances.
And I think about an important difference betwee GoG and Steam;)
I think he was comparing using DRMed games on Windows to using DRMed games on Linux. If those are compared, he said Linux is preferable, since Windows itself restricts users even more (not to mention that Windows always has built in own DRM).

I don't think he compared DRM free games (let's say Windows versions run in Wine on Linux), to DRMed ones run on Linux. So what he said doesn't apply to GOG vs Steam arguments IMHO.