Viewing topic Basemark GPU Benchmark

Title: Basemark GPU Benchmark

Page: 1/3 »

callcifer 23 Jun 2018

Link

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

Inspired by the Unigine Superposition thread, I've decided to create one for the new Basemark GPU benchmark, complete with leaderboards :)

Download the software [here](https://www.basemark.com/products/basemark-gpu/). Arch Linux users might prefer my [AUR package](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/basemark) instead.

Rules:

Official Test only. Run twice, once with OpenGL and once with Vulkan (if supported).

Post 3 screenshots: [Your specs](https://i.imgur.com/JXIrsNj.png) ("Hardware Info" tab), [OpenGL results](https://i.imgur.com/6DkmCOT.png) and [Vulkan results](https://i.imgur.com/6cJk5fG.png) (if supported).

If you are overclocking (CPU or GPU) mention it in the comments.

I will maintain separate leaderboards for OpenGL and Vulkan.

OpenGL Leader Board

Rank - Username - Score - Avg. FPS - CPU + GPU - Post link

1- truebluewoo - 11750 - 118 - i7-4770k + RTX 2080Ti - post link
2- Wimpress - 9075 - 91 - i9 9900k + GTX 1080Ti - post link
3- Xpander - 8194 - 81 - Ryzen 7 1700X + GTX 1080Ti - post link
4- madchaotikan - 8099 - 80 - Xeon E3 1231 + RTX 2080 - post link
5- callcifer - 7997 - 79 - i7 5820k + GTX 1080Ti - post link
6- FredO - 4955 - 49 - i7 5820k + GTX 980Ti - post link
7- entropie - 4180 - 42 - Ryzen 7 2700X + Vega64 - post link
8- 14 - 3710 - 37 - Ryzen 7 2700X + RX 580 - post link

Vulkan Leader Board

Rank - Username - Score - Avg. FPS - CPU + GPU - Post link

1- truebluewoo - 10638 - 106 - i7-4770k + RTX 2080Ti - post link
1- madchaotikan - 9416 - 94 - Xeon E3 1231 + RTX 2080 - post link
2- Wimpress - 7893 - 79 - i9 9900k + GTX 1080Ti - post link
3- callcifer - 7841 - 78 - i7 5820k + GTX 1080Ti - post link
4- Xpander - 7286 - 72 - Ryzen 7 1700X + GTX 1080Ti - post link
5- entropie - 5954 - 60 - Ryzen 7 2700X + Vega64 - post link
6- FredO - 5003 - 50 - i7 5820k + GTX 980Ti - post link

0 Likes

callcifer 23 Jun 2018

Link

I'll start :) I was surprised to see OpenGL vs Vulkan results. While OpenGL had a better score and much higher max. FPS, it also had much lower min. FPS, which was unexpected. I'd rather have a stable framerate than a higher max, so Vulkan is the winner for me.

Specs:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

OpenGL:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

Vulkan:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

Overclock:
CPU: 3.3GHz -> 4.4GHz
GPU: +125MHz graphics clock, +300MHz memory clock

0 Likes

Xpander 23 Jun 2018

Link

View PC info

Info:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

OpenGL:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

Vulkan:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

4K is bit hard for GPU like this. 1080p or 1440p is more suitable on GPU's below GTX 1080 or Vega 64

Ryzen 7 1700X @3.8ghz
GTX 1070 396.24.02 drivers, core offset +100, mem offset +300

just for fun a more suitable for this GPU - 2560x1440 result:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

0 Likes

callcifer 23 Jun 2018

Link

Quoting: Xpander4K is bit hard for GPU like this. 1080p or 1440p is more suitable on GPU's below GTX 1080 or Vega 64

Yeah, I wish the official test was 1080p. :/

0 Likes

FredO 24 Jun 2018

Link

OC: GPU: +150MHz graphics clock, +150MHz memory clock

Specs:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

OpenGL:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

Vulkan:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

0 Likes

Xpander 24 Jun 2018

Link

View PC info

Update did not have powerlimit increased from 150W to 170W on previous test, so the clocks did not go that high in reality.

same +100 core and +300 memory

OpenGL:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

Vulkan:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

now Vulkan minimum seems to be better also. Also i noticed that Vulkan rendering doesnt use CPU allmost at all, just 0.9-1.5% while with openGL i see over 6% of usage (thats not htop numbers but from 100% with 16 thread)

0 Likes

HerrLange 7 Oct 2018

Link

Not sure why basemark is not able to detect my Arch installation.

However I'm really surprised about the notable difference between OpenGL and Vulcan.

You can see my system in my PC Info profile. Everything is running stock. Only exception are the memory modules with does NOT run with their performance profile and clocked defensively to provide maximum stability. I'm not into OC at all.

SPEC

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

OpenGL

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

Vulcan

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

0 Likes

callcifer 22 Oct 2018

Link

Wow, we have a new #1! The difference between GTX 1080Ti and RTX 2080 seems crazy.

0 Likes

14 31 Oct 2018

Link

Supporter Plus

The Vulkan one did not run for me. I'm not even sure that the OpenGL one ran correctly. Instead of a large graphic animation, it was 64 square tiles of changing images.

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

0 Likes

callcifer 1 Nov 2018

Link

Quoting: 14Instead of a large graphic animation, it was 64 square tiles of changing images.

That's normal, it's just how this benchmark works.

0 Likes

Xpander 1 Nov 2018

Link

View PC info

Vulkan:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

OpenGL:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

Info

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

GPU in stock settings.

0 Likes

callcifer 1 Nov 2018

Link

Updated the boards, but your results look very weird. Your 1080Ti managed to outperform madchaotikan's RTX2080 on OpenGL, but significantly underperformed on Vulkan. Is it possibly a CPU thing?

0 Likes

Xpander 1 Nov 2018

Link

View PC info

Quoting: callciferUpdated the boards, but your results look very weird. Your 1080Ti managed to outperform madchaotikan's RTX2080 on OpenGL, but significantly underperformed on Vulkan. Is it possibly a CPU thing?

it might be, with vulkan running i didnt see any CPU load at all, basically zero, or say 1.5%. with openGL there was 1 thread going max, aka ~6% load in my 16thread cpu. so that might come down to singlethread perf as the OpenGL benchmark never capped GPU utilization also, it was just around 70%. Didnt check the GPU utilization on Vulkan though

0 Likes

Xpander 29 Nov 2018

Link

View PC info

Ok updated to GPUBenchmark 1.1 but now Vulkan option isn't available for me somehow. DXVK Works, Vulkan Native games work.

OpenGL Result:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

HW Info:

External Media: You need to be logged in to view this.

0 Likes

callcifer 1 Dec 2018

Link

How/where did you download 1.1?

0 Likes

Xpander 2 Dec 2018

Link

View PC info

Quoting: callciferHow/where did you download 1.1?

from their site, i think they took it down to fix some issues. It's 3.2GB so if you interested i can upload it somewhere. But i guess its better to wait while they have fixed version up on their website

0 Likes

drlamb 3 Dec 2018

Link

View PC info

Quoting: Xpander
Quoting: callciferHow/where did you download 1.1?
from their site, i think they took it down to fix some issues. It's 3.2GB so if you interested i can upload it somewhere. But i guess its better to wait while they have fixed version up on their website

Please:)

I find the lack of AMD (vega) results disturbing and I'd like to fix that.

0 Likes

Xpander 3 Dec 2018

Link

View PC info

Quoting: drlamb
Quoting: Xpander
Quoting: callciferHow/where did you download 1.1?
from their site, i think they took it down to fix some issues. It's 3.2GB so if you interested i can upload it somewhere. But i guess its better to wait while they have fixed version up on their website
Please:)

I find the lack of AMD (vega) results disturbing and I'd like to fix that.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NG1A6VsRRcX7G7yJ7kANnfba6e_WfPmm

0 Likes

pete910 6 Dec 2018

Link

View PC info

Quoting: drlamb
Quoting: Xpander
Quoting: callciferHow/where did you download 1.1?
from their site, i think they took it down to fix some issues. It's 3.2GB so if you interested i can upload it somewhere. But i guess its better to wait while they have fixed version up on their website
Please:)

I find the lack of AMD (vega) results disturbing and I'd like to fix that.

Good luck with that on vega, Still a no go on vulkan

0 Likes

callcifer 6 Dec 2018

Link

There is a new 1.1.0 release, hopefully with fixes. I've updated the Arch package.

EDIT: OK finally managed to test the new release. No Vulkan option and a worse OpenGL score for me :(

0 Likes

pete910 6 Dec 2018

Link

View PC info

Quoting: callciferThere is a new 1.1.0 release, hopefully with fixes. I've updated the Arch package.

EDIT: OK finally managed to test the new release. No Vulkan option and a worse OpenGL score for me :(

Replied to you on reddit I think, There's no Vulkan option for me either. AMD RX64

Edit:

What kind of score difference are you seeing ?

0 Likes

1 /3 »

While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations:

PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!