While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:
Reward Tiers:
Patreon. Plain Donations:
PayPal.
This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Reward Tiers:
This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register
https://twitter.com/jeremy_soller/status/1429424300990164993
There's an interesting discussion (more like 'controversy') going on at Jeremy Stoller's (the sys76 engineer linked above) twitter the past couple of days. See this thread, for example: https://twitter.com/jeremy_soller/status/1433487714926698498
It sounds like pop os devs are clashing with GNOME devs over custom stylesheets, with accusations flying both ways. As a silly amateur myself, I don't pretend to understand everything that's at stake, but each side seems to have a valid point. GNOME devs say: If you want features, contribute to the relevant repos at our gitlab; sys76 devs claim, on the other hand, that with an API with arbitrary handicaps, GNOME doesn't make it easy for outsiders to 'contribute'.