Quoting: Vladimir-DimovSadly, I have no way to get this game because it's unavailable on Steam. 🤮

See article above. You get it from Hypixel's website.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Of the new series since Voyager, I have only ever watched Lower Decks and Picard. None of the others interest me. I lost interest in DS9 after Voyager began and never watched more than one or two episodes of Enterprise.

Lower Decks was a HOOT and, Picard, well ... it's Patrick Stewart!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: sarmadThe solution to the ethical dilemma should come from politicians, but they are unfortunately too corrupt to do the right thing.

Why should ethics be the responsibility of government? That just brings more "nanny state" interference in everyone's lives. Ethics should be personal and exercised on the individual level. The corporations will switch gears soon enough once they realize their policy is garnering very few customers.

From the perspective of legality, however, there is the matter of the violated copyrights ...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I'm a little surprised. He could have just taken it down temporarily with the explanation he provided and then ran a kickstarter to raise the funds to pay a human artist to replace the genAI artwork. Perhaps it is not worth the extra effort?

Kudos to that new girlfriend though!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: dziadulewiczWhat are you ppl up there talking about? Nothing needs to die, snap and flatpak are also very different. Both have their place and more. This is important. Everything is important to get to work correctly and well on Linux and we should support Canonical on this effort!

I'm with @dziadulewicz on this. The objections to Snap seem idealogical and polarized rather than practical. There doesn't have to be one solution to the packaging "problem". In fact, it is more resilient if there isn't. Use the solution that works best for you and leave it to others to make their own choice.

Personally, I find the design of flatpaks to be complicated and wasteful of system resources. Storage is at a premium on my systems. The sandboxing, well laudable, is quite annoying when you want to integrate the app into your system. It is like you are running two operating systems instead of one.

AppImages, on the other hand, are all contained in one file. You mark it as executable and run it. If you want to sandbox it, you can. There are several excellent tools to manage integration and updating too. Personally, I prefer to control my updating and download and replace the files by hand. You can place the AppImage file wherever you want. It doesn't have to be in the file system partition at all. AppImages are intuitive and very simple to use.

I have no experience with Snaps, as I don't use a distribution they ship with. I cannot comment, as they do not effect me (:winks: at @scaine).

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: GuestI don't like using AppImage either, it's too cumbersome to use for launching applications and there's no built-in application update system.

FALSE. Been a while since you've looked at AppImage, I'm guessing? Most modern AppImage files are shipping with built-in update support (0 A.D. For example). There are two ways that I'm aware of to get AppImage updating these days. One is the official AppImageUpdate [External Link] (which is distributed via an AppImage and can also update itself). This is still considered to be in beta. The other is to use AM / AppMan (AppImage Package Manager) [External Link].

AM is a command line tool that aims to be the "APT" of AppImages. This tool also offers the choice to use "AppMan", a portable version of "AM", limited to installing and managing apps only locally and without root privileges. It is quite extensive & powerful: installs, integrates, updates and uninstalls, utilizing a main database registry. The user can assign their own folders and integrate via the launch parameter.

It is even possible to sandbox your AppImages, if you crave that flatpak experience (I don't). Read this [External Link] to update your knowledge of the state of AppImage updating and AppImages in general.

I don't get that old saw that AppImages are too cumbersome to use for launching applications. Simply right click on the file, select properties, go to the permissions tab and check the "run as executable" box. Not hard at all. If you want it integrated into the DE's menu, do it manually or install AM / AppMan, AppImagelauncher, Gear-Lever (I recommend the unofficial AppImage version [External Link]) or even the very basic appimaged.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I imagine that most developers choose not to retain older versions because of support issues. Having to determine which version of the game is being used to troubleshoot the user's problem would be a pain in the butt! Of course, the solution would be a notice from the developer that they will only provide support for the latest version.

It reminds me of a bug report experience I had long ago with Morrowind. I had discovered an issue and decided to report it to Bethesda. I had to applaud the tech on this one. I was so embarrassed. It turned out I hadn't installed the latest patch, which had been out for awhile. The Bethesda tech, once realizing this, just politely told me that the bug had already been addressed in the latest patch and provided a link. 😆

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Caldathras

And most games do exactly that. They ship their 32bit modules.(not all 32bit libraries, mind you, but still!)

And it's a shame more of them don't ship ALL of the needed libraries (32-bit or 64-bit). It's annoying to download a supposedly universal/generic installer only to have it fail on account of a missing version of a particular library. If they did, I'll bet we wouldn't have to worry as much about old native games failing in newer versions of Linux. (Missing libraries even happen with flatpaks & AppImages due to poor packaging jobs by devs.)

Looking at you, OpenMW 0.50.0!

Steam Linux Runtime 4 turned out to be the solution to getting OpenMW 0.50.0 to run on my less current but still supported version of Linux Mint (Version 21.3). I posted a how-to comment here:

How to Setup OpenMW for Modern Morrowind on Linux

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Architect of Ruin looks very interesting. The no AI stance makes it even more so.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: eggroleAs more "normies" come over to linux and want one-click everything, you will get a more windows like experience whether you like it or not. ::SNIP::
It will move linux in general from an enthusiast OS to an everyman OS.

What an oddly binary point of view. Either this or that with no grey areas. Linux has always been about the grey areas. A hardcore enthusiast distribution like Arch isn't going to disappear just because former Windows users want a less complicated experience. As always, Linux will provide both and then some.

View this comment - View article - View full comments