Quoting: MalJust another portable gaming device.

i dont know the category but i think it count as "mobile" gaming ;)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Guestwhat's the point of having a computer in a car, aside from increasing global microelectronics demand? I can understand ABS and other safety assistance, but relying on tecnology so much makes us too vulnerable, especially when all this hardware can be remotely controlled of blocked at vendor's will.

i think the point is being able to do whatever you want with your computer, that just happen to be embed to an car to control it so you can have auto pilot.


i can understand the security concers, if they have any hole in the sandbox that could be disastrous, but in genral we trust linux and virtual machines to be secure enough... to put our lives at risk with tons of uncessary systems running in the same system even when they arent nescessary?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: M@GOid

Quoting: elmapul

Quoting: M@GOidI wish Appimage became more widespread. So many projects have a Linux port but don't provide a convenient way to use the thing. Meanwhile those same projects don't have a problem providing a Windows executable.

That just contribute to the bad look Linux have among Windows users "I don't use Linux because I don't want to compile a program to use it".

its not the developers fault if we dont have an standard on linux like windows have with .exe, we are just now making those techs that work across distros and even with then some distros chose to not support all of then or offer a crap support so we still have to solve "political problems" before we can solve "techinical" ones, not to mention is a bit hard to make those packages last time i checked.

but hey, if you think otherwise you can always package yourself once they relase the source code...

Sorry, I don't agree. If you have a app and are releasing it out there for people to use, you can do your part to easy things for the end user, just like you do with the Windows executable. Appimage is not a new thing, and way before it, some devs just released a compressed file with precompiled stuff and their dependencies. Just drop it on a folder and off you go. Mozilla does it for ages with Firefox and Thunderbird.

Some devs, even the ones doing commercial stuff, just don't get it, or blatantly refuse, to accept that not all Linux users feel comfortable with the command line. It is a attitude problem. The old excuse for lack of standardization doesn't cut anymore.

yeah i already download those tar.gz where you suppose to extract and run the stuff.
but often they dont work, there is a reason for that.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: M@GOidI wish Appimage became more widespread. So many projects have a Linux port but don't provide a convenient way to use the thing. Meanwhile those same projects don't have a problem providing a Windows executable.

That just contribute to the bad look Linux have among Windows users "I don't use Linux because I don't want to compile a program to use it".

its not the developers fault if we dont have an standard on linux like windows have with .exe, we are just now making those techs that work across distros and even with then some distros chose to not support all of then or offer a crap support so we still have to solve "political problems" before we can solve "techinical" ones, not to mention is a bit hard to make those packages last time i checked.

but hey, if you think otherwise you can always package yourself once they relase the source code...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: KristianThe thing with an asset store is that guven that the engine is open source/free software in theory anyone can set up their own competing asset store. Now that might not be a big worry in practice for example because people want to have everything in one place.

actually godot already have an asset store and option to add the url to get stuff from others.
what it lack is an way to do/receive payments on it, and we already have asset stores on some webpages where you can purchase stuff

View this comment - View article - View full comments

"we want the Foundation to serve as a home for community initiatives, by allowing it to have its own funding lines (this means, so they can raise funding on their own for a specific goal, but the Foundation receives and uses it according to what was agreed), such as initiatives to promote education, communication and diversity".

this is HUGE, i cant believe i forgot to mention the best part.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

as for an way to buy/sell assets on the asset store, that is a must have for their ecosystem, competing with unreal and unity isnt easy, people say a lot of things about opensource software, but even an empty text document is an open source software, you just have to write your own code to make the features you want, in other words, being opensource alone dont means much, if you lack too many essential features, then its useless for most people, they cant afford to use your software and write the features they need and it lacks, instead they will be better served using proprietary softwares and making/downloading addons for then or dealing with their limitations in case that is impossible.

comparing unity to godot is akin to compare windows to linux, linux may be better as a system, but the windows ecosystem has more softwares and for many its economically inviable to use linux (they need softwares that only work on windows to pay the bills), the same can be said about some addons for unity, the good news is, as soon as godot get more popular, addon developers might make an version for godot, it happened with blender for example.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

i have mixed feelings here.

i liked how things worked under the umbrela of the Software Freedom Conservancy charity, not only the project was developing fine as it was, but they had to be accountable by an thirdy party, in theory this hold then more accountable to invest the money from donnors into the common goods for us, instead of using for something else.
another thing to consider is that they already have the "W4 Games" to act as an "commercial bridge", so having their own foundation looks a bit redundant.

on the other hand, dealing with thirdy parties can have it own problems, if the other foundation had corrupt people for example, who lie about the ammount they received or stuff like that, then there would be little they could do to act uppon it, its better to move sooner rather than later after something happen.

on the other hand, we were helping 2 important projects at once, the free software conservancy who act as an incubator for projects like godot (as far as i understood) and the godot project, now we are helping just one, it feel like a "betrayal" or maybe its just a graduation and that is how the conservancy group suppose to be? an incubator for small projects to be hosted until they can host thenselves, and then the conservancy group is free to help other projects instead?

merchandising
their logo is mega popular, any merchandising based on it should be as well

more on the next comment

View this comment - View article - View full comments

steamdeck is doing miracles for the ecosystem, the entire ecosystem is evolving faster than ever and looks like its accelerating.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

i think they will use this oportunity to port any game specific code to unreal engine, so it will reduce the ammount of work they will have to make witcher 4 on it.

witcher 1 remake should have less content afterall

View this comment - View article - View full comments