Not the same developer as the first game and still no indication that anything really changed. Not the most comforting sign.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Enjoyed the first game, so looking forward to it. A bit pricey for the length, but well made.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I'm mixed about this one. I'm not really looking for Talos1 with fancy graphics as the original was fine. And since I played it to death, it has nothing left for me from a puzzle perspective. But having a little extra campaign does make it more interesting. At least Croteam are still devs that I don't mind supporting since I've enjoyed their stuff. So let's see what they want for this.

Quoting: AsciiWolfSeems like Croteam are also finished with native Linux builds now.

Yeah. Alen Ladavec was the one that pulled the Linux development there. When he left for Google Stadia, all Linux knowledge was gone.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: hell0It sucks for itch and imo, their registrar is still at fault if itch did indeed reply (should have trigger a human check). But in general "shoot first, check second" is sadly the most efficient way to protect people from scams, phishing and other bad stuff.

It can also be easily abused to get rid of legitimate sites. The only question is how long it will take before it happens.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

The final part of the story mode has been pushed to next year, so I'll leave the game until we get a release date for that. Still have the 3rd and 4th part to play though.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I updated to Kubuntu 24.10 a few weeks ago and it's not been a great experience. The biggest problem is kwin locking inputs multiple times per day. This means I have to go to a console to kill it. This issue existed in Plasma 5 as well, but there it was at most once a week. Combined the the forced snap issue, I'm currently in a bit of a DE/Distro limbo and still haven't decided what to do.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: CaldathrasInteresting, I was hoping for an update on UMU support. There's no .deb file for Ubuntu/LM users yet.

I'm still on v0.5.16 myself.

UMU is working in 0.5.17. It just never mentions it.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

So far this is only a few images and a video. This stuff is easy to make these days. Making a functional and fun game is not easy. This may have tencent backing, but it's still a first product of a new studio. Jumping into something this complex out of nothing is going to be extremely problematic. This has "The Day Before" vibes written all over it and I'd be surprised if it ever sees the light of day.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Purple Library GuyI'm sure stuff that produces better output is possible, and indeed I'm pretty sure true AI is possible (although it won't be all-powerful like some of the rich weirdos imagine). But that will be a different technology, not just iterations on current large language model concepts.

Mirrors my thoughts on it. Current digital electronics have limitations that will break the pace of development when we get too close. Just as happened with CPUs. We're in times where major leaps have turned into minor incremental changes. Parallelism is where the focus is now and even there you can see that things complicate the process. Communication/bandwidth/synchronisation puts some hefty constraints on what can be achieved. But a continuously running self learning neural network I don't see happening with our current computer technology. It just doesn't seem to be a good match.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: yellowThe game engine does not make the game for you. The game engine provides a foundation and some building blocks for you, but you still have to know how to put them together and program the game itself. Not to mention creating all of the assets for the game. This is all hard, very time consuming work. Not even using premade assets will spare you from the work it takes to create a high-quality, functioning game. There is a reason asset flips are so easy to spot, and there is a reason why almost nobody plays them.

This does kind of sit at the core of why customers should be wary of AI.

The hardest thing of game development is not programming, but game design. This is why indies can outshine AAA studios with a hundred million budget. Designing interesting engaging gameplay is not a trivial task. I know, I've tried and I've been unable to get above mediocrity.

In parallel you can see that in graphics art design is the core of what makes things visually appealing. No amount of fidelity can make your art look good if the design of the visuals as a whole is not on point. For obvious reasons I've been playing Half-Life 2 again and it's shocking how easy it is to get immersed in that game. Even though models aren't super detailed and texture resolution is very low, you look past it because the design of everything is so good.

Both of these design aspects require careful thought and planning to execute well. This is something AI simply can't do. Even though the "I" is in the name, there is nothing intelligent about it. It's just an algorithm that spits out patterns based on the patterns it was trained on. It does not have any capacity for thought and reason and can't design anything. And honestly, I don't see that changing in the future because they'll run into physical limits of current computer technology well before closing the gap between the ability of skilled people.

Of course publishers would really like to use AI generated graphics because it would be cheap and be beneficial to their bottom line. But as a consumer you should really think twice whether you want to support this development because it's not going to make future games any better. So disclosure help me choose the path I want to support.

View this comment - View article - View full comments